Match running performance is influenced by possession and team formation in an English Premier League team.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Biology of Sport Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-12 DOI:10.5114/biolsport.2024.135414
Ryland Morgans, John Radnor, Jose Fonseca, Chris Haslam, Matthew King, Dave Rhodes, Piotr Żmijewski, Rafael Oliveira
{"title":"Match running performance is influenced by possession and team formation in an English Premier League team.","authors":"Ryland Morgans, John Radnor, Jose Fonseca, Chris Haslam, Matthew King, Dave Rhodes, Piotr Żmijewski, Rafael Oliveira","doi":"10.5114/biolsport.2024.135414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to examine the possession (very low, low, high, and very high), team formation (3-5-2 and 4-3-3) and position (centre-backs, full-backs, centre midfielders, attacking midfielders, and centre forwards) on match load across two consecutive seasons in elite soccer. Twenty-seven English Premier League outfield players were recruited. Data was monitored through an 18 Hz Global Positioning System and a 25 Hz semi-automated camera tracking system, respectively, and all variables were analysed per minute. Main effects for formation on total distance (TD) (p = 0.006; <i>η</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.010), high-speed running (HSR) (p = 0.009; <i>η</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.009), number of high metabolic load (HML) efforts (p = 0.004; <i>η</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.011) were observed. In addition, there were significant interaction effects with formation × possession on TD (p < 0.001; <i>η</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.043), HSR (p = 0.006; <i>η</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.018), sprinting (p < 0.001; <i>η</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.030), HML efforts (p < 0.001; <i>η</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.035), accelerations (p < 0.001; <i>η</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.025). From the position-specific analysis, only the running performance of centre-backs was affected by formation or positional factors. These results indicate that formation and possession can have a significant impact on TD, HSR, and HML distance. Furthermore, players performed more high-intensity efforts in 3-5-2 than 4-3-3 formation. These findings suggest that coaches can evaluate running performance in the context of formation and possession and tailor tactical strategies to optimise physical performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":55365,"journal":{"name":"Biology of Sport","volume":"41 3","pages":"275-286"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11167476/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology of Sport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2024.135414","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the possession (very low, low, high, and very high), team formation (3-5-2 and 4-3-3) and position (centre-backs, full-backs, centre midfielders, attacking midfielders, and centre forwards) on match load across two consecutive seasons in elite soccer. Twenty-seven English Premier League outfield players were recruited. Data was monitored through an 18 Hz Global Positioning System and a 25 Hz semi-automated camera tracking system, respectively, and all variables were analysed per minute. Main effects for formation on total distance (TD) (p = 0.006; η 2 = 0.010), high-speed running (HSR) (p = 0.009; η 2 = 0.009), number of high metabolic load (HML) efforts (p = 0.004; η 2 = 0.011) were observed. In addition, there were significant interaction effects with formation × possession on TD (p < 0.001; η 2 = 0.043), HSR (p = 0.006; η 2 = 0.018), sprinting (p < 0.001; η 2 = 0.030), HML efforts (p < 0.001; η 2 = 0.035), accelerations (p < 0.001; η 2 = 0.025). From the position-specific analysis, only the running performance of centre-backs was affected by formation or positional factors. These results indicate that formation and possession can have a significant impact on TD, HSR, and HML distance. Furthermore, players performed more high-intensity efforts in 3-5-2 than 4-3-3 formation. These findings suggest that coaches can evaluate running performance in the context of formation and possession and tailor tactical strategies to optimise physical performance.

英超球队的比赛跑动表现受控球率和球队阵型的影响。
本研究的目的是探讨在连续两个赛季的精英足球比赛中,控球率(极低、低、高和极高)、球队阵型(3-5-2 和 4-3-3)和位置(中后卫、后卫、中场、攻击型中场和中前卫)对比赛负荷的影响。研究人员招募了 27 名英格兰足球超级联赛外场球员。数据分别通过 18 Hz 全球定位系统和 25 Hz 半自动摄像跟踪系统进行监测,所有变量均以每分钟为单位进行分析。在总距离(TD)(p = 0.006;η 2 = 0.010)、高速跑(HSR)(p = 0.009;η 2 = 0.009)、高代谢负荷(HML)次数(p = 0.004;η 2 = 0.011)上观察到队形的主效应。此外,队形 × 控球对 TD (p < 0.001; η 2 = 0.043)、HSR (p = 0.006; η 2 = 0.018)、冲刺 (p < 0.001; η 2 = 0.030)、HML 努力 (p < 0.001; η 2 = 0.035)、加速度 (p < 0.001; η 2 = 0.025) 有明显的交互效应。从位置特异性分析来看,只有中后卫的跑动表现受到阵型或位置因素的影响。这些结果表明,阵型和控球率会对TD、HSR和HML距离产生显著影响。此外,与 4-3-3 阵型相比,3-5-2 阵型中球员的高强度跑动更多。这些研究结果表明,教练员可以根据阵型和控球率来评估跑动表现,并制定战术策略以优化体能表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biology of Sport
Biology of Sport 生物-运动科学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
113
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biology of Sport is the official journal of the Institute of Sport in Warsaw, Poland, published since 1984. Biology of Sport is an international scientific peer-reviewed journal, published quarterly in both paper and electronic format. The journal publishes articles concerning basic and applied sciences in sport: sports and exercise physiology, sports immunology and medicine, sports genetics, training and testing, pharmacology, as well as in other biological aspects related to sport. Priority is given to inter-disciplinary papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信