Associations between COVID-19 therapies and outcomes in rural and urban America: A multisite, temporal analysis from the Alpha to Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variants.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
A Jerrod Anzalone, William H Beasley, Kimberly Murray, William B Hillegass, Makayla Schissel, Michael T Vest, Scott A Chapman, Ronald Horswell, Lucio Miele, J Zachary Porterfield, H Timothy Bunnell, Bradley S Price, Sharon Patrick, Clifford J Rosen, Susan L Santangelo, James C McClay, Sally L Hodder
{"title":"Associations between COVID-19 therapies and outcomes in rural and urban America: A multisite, temporal analysis from the Alpha to Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variants.","authors":"A Jerrod Anzalone, William H Beasley, Kimberly Murray, William B Hillegass, Makayla Schissel, Michael T Vest, Scott A Chapman, Ronald Horswell, Lucio Miele, J Zachary Porterfield, H Timothy Bunnell, Bradley S Price, Sharon Patrick, Clifford J Rosen, Susan L Santangelo, James C McClay, Sally L Hodder","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the enduring disparities in adverse COVID-19 events between urban and rural communities in the United States, focusing on the effects of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and therapeutic advances on patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) data from 2021 to 2023, this retrospective cohort study examined COVID-19 hospitalization, inpatient death, and other adverse events. Populations were categorized into urban, urban-adjacent rural (UAR), and nonurban-adjacent rural (NAR). Adjustments included demographics, variant-dominant waves, comorbidities, region, and SARS-CoV-2 treatment and vaccination. Statistical methods included Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, multivariable logistic, and Cox regression.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The study included 3,018,646 patients, with rural residents constituting 506,204. These rural dwellers were older, had more comorbidities, and were less vaccinated than their urban counterparts. Adjusted analyses revealed higher hospitalization odds in UAR and NAR (aOR 1.07 [1.05-1.08] and 1.06 [1.03-1.08]), greater inpatient death hazard (aHR 1.30 [1.26-1.35] UAR and 1.37 [1.30-1.45] NAR), and greater risk of other adverse events compared to urban dwellers. Delta increased, while Omicron decreased, inpatient adverse events relative to pre-Delta, with rural disparities persisting throughout. Treatment effectiveness and vaccination were similarly protective across all cohorts, but dexamethasone post-ventilation was effective only in urban areas. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir better protected rural residents against hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite advancements in treatment and vaccinations, disparities in adverse COVID-19 outcomes persist between urban and rural communities. The effectiveness of some therapeutic agents appears to vary based on rurality, suggesting a nuanced relationship between treatment and geographic location while highlighting the need for targeted rural health care strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12857","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the enduring disparities in adverse COVID-19 events between urban and rural communities in the United States, focusing on the effects of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and therapeutic advances on patient outcomes.

Methods: Using National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) data from 2021 to 2023, this retrospective cohort study examined COVID-19 hospitalization, inpatient death, and other adverse events. Populations were categorized into urban, urban-adjacent rural (UAR), and nonurban-adjacent rural (NAR). Adjustments included demographics, variant-dominant waves, comorbidities, region, and SARS-CoV-2 treatment and vaccination. Statistical methods included Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, multivariable logistic, and Cox regression.

Findings: The study included 3,018,646 patients, with rural residents constituting 506,204. These rural dwellers were older, had more comorbidities, and were less vaccinated than their urban counterparts. Adjusted analyses revealed higher hospitalization odds in UAR and NAR (aOR 1.07 [1.05-1.08] and 1.06 [1.03-1.08]), greater inpatient death hazard (aHR 1.30 [1.26-1.35] UAR and 1.37 [1.30-1.45] NAR), and greater risk of other adverse events compared to urban dwellers. Delta increased, while Omicron decreased, inpatient adverse events relative to pre-Delta, with rural disparities persisting throughout. Treatment effectiveness and vaccination were similarly protective across all cohorts, but dexamethasone post-ventilation was effective only in urban areas. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir better protected rural residents against hospitalization.

Conclusions: Despite advancements in treatment and vaccinations, disparities in adverse COVID-19 outcomes persist between urban and rural communities. The effectiveness of some therapeutic agents appears to vary based on rurality, suggesting a nuanced relationship between treatment and geographic location while highlighting the need for targeted rural health care strategies.

COVID-19疗法与美国农村和城市结果之间的关系:从 Alpha 到 Omicron SARS-CoV-2 变体的多地点时间分析。
目的:调查美国城市和农村社区之间 COVID-19 不良事件的持久差异,重点关注 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗接种和治疗进展对患者预后的影响:这项回顾性队列研究利用全国 COVID 队列协作组织 (N3C) 2021 年至 2023 年的数据,研究了 COVID-19 的住院、住院患者死亡和其他不良事件。人群分为城市、城市邻近农村(UAR)和非城市邻近农村(NAR)。调整因素包括人口统计学、变异主导波、合并症、地区、SARS-CoV-2 治疗和疫苗接种。统计方法包括 Kaplan-Meier 生存估计、多变量 logistic 和 Cox 回归:研究包括 3,018,646 名患者,其中农村居民占 506,204 人。与城市居民相比,这些农村居民年龄更大,合并症更多,接种疫苗更少。调整后的分析显示,与城市居民相比,UAR 和 NAR 的住院几率更高(aOR 分别为 1.07 [1.05-1.08] 和 1.06 [1.03-1.08]),住院患者的死亡风险更高(aHR 分别为 UAR 1.30 [1.26-1.35] 和 NAR 1.37 [1.30-1.45]),其他不良事件的风险也更高。与 Delta 前相比,Delta 增加了住院病人不良事件,而 Omicron 则减少了住院病人不良事件,农村地区的差异始终存在。在所有组群中,治疗效果和疫苗接种同样具有保护作用,但地塞米松通气后治疗仅在城市地区有效。Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir和molnupiravir能更好地保护农村居民免于住院治疗:结论:尽管在治疗和疫苗接种方面取得了进步,COVID-19 的不良后果在城市和农村社区之间仍然存在差异。一些治疗药物的效果似乎因农村地区而异,这表明治疗与地理位置之间存在着微妙的关系,同时也凸显了有针对性的农村医疗保健策略的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Rural Health
Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信