The Risk of Microbial Transmission in Recipients of Donor Livers That Underwent Hypothermic or Normothermic Machine Perfusion.

IF 1.9 Q3 TRANSPLANTATION
Transplantation Direct Pub Date : 2024-06-26 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1097/TXD.0000000000001664
Chikako Endo, Bianca Lascaris, Isabel M A Brüggenwirth, Jan Roggeveld, Hans Blokzijl, Vincent E de Meijer, M H Edwina Doting, Robert J Porte
{"title":"The Risk of Microbial Transmission in Recipients of Donor Livers That Underwent Hypothermic or Normothermic Machine Perfusion.","authors":"Chikako Endo, Bianca Lascaris, Isabel M A Brüggenwirth, Jan Roggeveld, Hans Blokzijl, Vincent E de Meijer, M H Edwina Doting, Robert J Porte","doi":"10.1097/TXD.0000000000001664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ex situ machine perfusion is increasingly used to preserve and assess donor livers before transplantation. Compared with traditional static cold storage (SCS), machine perfusion exposes livers to an additional risk of microbial contamination. However, information on the risk of microbial transmission during machine perfusion is lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All livers that underwent either hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) or normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) in our center between September 2021 and September 2023, and during which samples were taken from SCS fluid and/or machine perfusion solution for microbiological examination, were included in this retrospective, observational clinical study. Microbial transmission was examined from SCS fluid to machine perfusion solution fluid and, subsequently, to recipients of these livers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 90 cases of liver machine perfusion were included: 59 HOPE and 31 NMP. SCS preservation fluid cultures before HOPE or NMP were positive for at least 1 microorganism in 52% of the cases. After HOPE, there were no cases of positive machine perfusion fluid or evidence of microbial transmission to the recipients. After NMP, in 1 (3%) patient <i>Escherichia coli</i> was grown from abdominal drain fluid, the same bacterial strain that was also grown from the SCS preservation fluid before NMP. This <i>E coli</i> was resistant to the antibiotics that are routinely added to the NMP perfusion fluid.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The risk of microbial transmission after machine perfusion is very low but not absent. We recommend routine sampling of machine perfusion fluid at the end of the procedure for microbiological analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":23225,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Direct","volume":"10 7","pages":"e1664"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11216676/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Direct","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ex situ machine perfusion is increasingly used to preserve and assess donor livers before transplantation. Compared with traditional static cold storage (SCS), machine perfusion exposes livers to an additional risk of microbial contamination. However, information on the risk of microbial transmission during machine perfusion is lacking.

Methods: All livers that underwent either hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) or normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) in our center between September 2021 and September 2023, and during which samples were taken from SCS fluid and/or machine perfusion solution for microbiological examination, were included in this retrospective, observational clinical study. Microbial transmission was examined from SCS fluid to machine perfusion solution fluid and, subsequently, to recipients of these livers.

Results: A total of 90 cases of liver machine perfusion were included: 59 HOPE and 31 NMP. SCS preservation fluid cultures before HOPE or NMP were positive for at least 1 microorganism in 52% of the cases. After HOPE, there were no cases of positive machine perfusion fluid or evidence of microbial transmission to the recipients. After NMP, in 1 (3%) patient Escherichia coli was grown from abdominal drain fluid, the same bacterial strain that was also grown from the SCS preservation fluid before NMP. This E coli was resistant to the antibiotics that are routinely added to the NMP perfusion fluid.

Conclusions: The risk of microbial transmission after machine perfusion is very low but not absent. We recommend routine sampling of machine perfusion fluid at the end of the procedure for microbiological analysis.

接受低温或常温机器灌注的捐肝受体的微生物传播风险。
背景:原位机器灌注越来越多地用于移植前保存和评估供体肝脏。与传统的静态冷藏(SCS)相比,机器灌注会使肝脏面临额外的微生物污染风险。然而,目前还缺乏有关机器灌注过程中微生物传播风险的信息:本回顾性观察临床研究纳入了 2021 年 9 月至 2023 年 9 月期间在本中心接受低温氧合机器灌注(HOPE)或常温机器灌注(NMP)的所有肝脏,并在此期间从 SCS 液体和/或机器灌注液中提取样本进行微生物检查。研究人员检查了从 SCS 液到机器灌注液以及随后到这些肝脏受体的微生物传播情况:结果:共纳入了 90 例肝脏机器灌注病例:结果:共纳入 90 例肝脏机器灌注:59 例 HOPE 和 31 例 NMP。在 HOPE 或 NMP 之前进行的 SCS 保存液培养中,52% 的病例至少有一种微生物呈阳性。HOPE 后,没有出现机器灌注液阳性的病例,也没有证据表明微生物传播给了受术者。在 NMP 之后,1 名(3%)患者的腹腔引流液中生长出了大肠埃希氏菌,与 NMP 之前 SCS 保存液中生长出的细菌菌株相同。这种大肠杆菌对常规添加到 NMP 灌注液中的抗生素具有抗药性:结论:机器灌注后的微生物传播风险很低,但并非不存在。我们建议在手术结束时对机器灌注液进行常规取样,以便进行微生物分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplantation Direct
Transplantation Direct TRANSPLANTATION-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
193
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信