Randomized Controlled Trial of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols in Live Kidney Donors: ERASKT Study.

IF 1.9 Q3 TRANSPLANTATION
Transplantation Direct Pub Date : 2024-06-26 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1097/TXD.0000000000001663
Jacob Saks, Uzung Yoon, Natalie Neiswinter, Eric S Schwenk, Stephen Goldberg, Linh Nguyen, Marc C Torjman, Elia Elia, Ashesh Shah
{"title":"Randomized Controlled Trial of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols in Live Kidney Donors: ERASKT Study.","authors":"Jacob Saks, Uzung Yoon, Natalie Neiswinter, Eric S Schwenk, Stephen Goldberg, Linh Nguyen, Marc C Torjman, Elia Elia, Ashesh Shah","doi":"10.1097/TXD.0000000000001663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways represent a comprehensive approach to optimizing perioperative management and reducing hospital stay and cost. In living donor kidney transplantation, key impediments to postoperative discharge include pain, and opioid associated complications such as nausea, vomiting, and the return of gastrointestinal function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized controlled trial, living kidney transplantation donors were assigned to either the ERAS or control group. The ERAS group patients received 15 preoperative, 17 intraoperative, 19 postoperative element intervention. The control group received standard care. The ERAS group received a multimodal opioid sparing pain management including an intraoperative transverse abdominis plane block. Our primary outcome measure was postoperative opioid consumption. The secondary outcome measures were postoperative pain scores, first oral intake, and hospital length of stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in demographics between the 2 groups. The ERAS group had a statistically significant reduction in total postoperative opioid consumption calculated in intravenous morphine equivalents (24.2 ± 20.2 versus 71 ± 39.5 mg, <i>P</i> < 0.01). Postoperative pain scores were significantly lower (<i>P</i> < 0.001) from 1 h postoperatively to 48 h. Surgical time was 45 min shorter (<i>P</i> = 0.037). Intraoperative PlasmaLyte administration was lower (PlasmaLyte: 1444 ± 907 versus 2168 ± 1347 mL, <i>P</i> = 0.049). Time to tolerating regular diet was shorter by 2 h (<i>P</i> < 0.008), and length of hospital stay was decreased by 10.1 h.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ERAS group experienced superior postoperative analgesia and a shorter length of hospital stay compared with controls.</p>","PeriodicalId":23225,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Direct","volume":"10 7","pages":"e1663"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11216682/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Direct","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways represent a comprehensive approach to optimizing perioperative management and reducing hospital stay and cost. In living donor kidney transplantation, key impediments to postoperative discharge include pain, and opioid associated complications such as nausea, vomiting, and the return of gastrointestinal function.

Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, living kidney transplantation donors were assigned to either the ERAS or control group. The ERAS group patients received 15 preoperative, 17 intraoperative, 19 postoperative element intervention. The control group received standard care. The ERAS group received a multimodal opioid sparing pain management including an intraoperative transverse abdominis plane block. Our primary outcome measure was postoperative opioid consumption. The secondary outcome measures were postoperative pain scores, first oral intake, and hospital length of stay.

Results: There were no significant differences in demographics between the 2 groups. The ERAS group had a statistically significant reduction in total postoperative opioid consumption calculated in intravenous morphine equivalents (24.2 ± 20.2 versus 71 ± 39.5 mg, P < 0.01). Postoperative pain scores were significantly lower (P < 0.001) from 1 h postoperatively to 48 h. Surgical time was 45 min shorter (P = 0.037). Intraoperative PlasmaLyte administration was lower (PlasmaLyte: 1444 ± 907 versus 2168 ± 1347 mL, P = 0.049). Time to tolerating regular diet was shorter by 2 h (P < 0.008), and length of hospital stay was decreased by 10.1 h.

Conclusions: The ERAS group experienced superior postoperative analgesia and a shorter length of hospital stay compared with controls.

活体肾脏捐献者术后恢复强化方案随机对照试验:ERASKT研究。
背景:加强术后恢复(ERAS)路径是优化围手术期管理、减少住院时间和费用的综合方法。在活体肾移植中,术后出院的主要障碍包括疼痛和阿片类药物相关并发症,如恶心、呕吐和胃肠功能恢复:在这项随机对照试验中,活体肾移植供体被分配到 ERAS 或对照组。ERAS 组患者接受了 15 次术前、17 次术中、19 次术后元素干预。对照组接受标准护理。ERAS 组接受多模式阿片类药物缓解疼痛治疗,包括术中腹横肌平面阻滞。我们的主要结果指标是术后阿片类药物的消耗量。次要结果指标是术后疼痛评分、首次口服量和住院时间:结果:两组在人口统计学方面无明显差异。以静脉注射吗啡当量计算,ERAS 组术后阿片类药物总用量明显减少(24.2 ± 20.2 对 71 ± 39.5 毫克,P P = 0.037)。术中PlasmaLyte用量较低(PlasmaLyte:1444 ± 907 mL对2168 ± 1347 mL,P = 0.049)。可耐受常规饮食的时间缩短了 2 小时(P 结论:ERAS 组的术后效果更好:与对照组相比,ERAS 组的术后镇痛效果更好,住院时间更短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplantation Direct
Transplantation Direct TRANSPLANTATION-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
193
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信