Changes in Urine Drug Screen Sensitivity in Adolescent Opioid Presentations to the Emergency Department.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000003173
Alexander Sidlak, Mannet Dhaliwal
{"title":"Changes in Urine Drug Screen Sensitivity in Adolescent Opioid Presentations to the Emergency Department.","authors":"Alexander Sidlak, Mannet Dhaliwal","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Adolescent overdoses have been rising over the past decade. Emergency department (ED) visits for both acute overdoses and for adolescents in opioid withdrawal have risen post-COVID. Urine drug screens have poor utility in the ED but are routinely obtained for medical clearance and in the management of patients with substance use disorder. Our primary goal was to measure the sensitivity of the opiate urine drug assay over time in opioid-related presentations to the ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed ED presentations at all EDs within our health system that were directly related to opioids from 1/1/2014 to 12/31/2022. For each patient included over the time frame, we identified whether a urine drug screen was obtained and the results from this screen. The urine drug screen available at all sites was an enzyme-multiplied immunoassay with an opiate screen (morphine antibody), but no fentanyl screen. The percent positivity for each drug category on enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique testing was calculated. Chi-squared tests were used to compare positivity rates between years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Opiate positivity declined over the last 9 years. Positivity rates from 2020 to 2022 were 5% ± 2% vs 82% ± 6% from 2014 to 2019 ( P < 0.001) Performance of UDS also declined over time (76% from 2014 to 2019 vs 46% from 2020 to 2022; P < 0.001). UDS was more likely to be performed in patients after a suicide attempt or when presenting after illicit use (66% vs 38%; P = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Opiate screen positivity decreased the last 9 years and may reflect wider use of fentanyl among this population starting in 2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003173","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Adolescent overdoses have been rising over the past decade. Emergency department (ED) visits for both acute overdoses and for adolescents in opioid withdrawal have risen post-COVID. Urine drug screens have poor utility in the ED but are routinely obtained for medical clearance and in the management of patients with substance use disorder. Our primary goal was to measure the sensitivity of the opiate urine drug assay over time in opioid-related presentations to the ED.

Methods: We reviewed ED presentations at all EDs within our health system that were directly related to opioids from 1/1/2014 to 12/31/2022. For each patient included over the time frame, we identified whether a urine drug screen was obtained and the results from this screen. The urine drug screen available at all sites was an enzyme-multiplied immunoassay with an opiate screen (morphine antibody), but no fentanyl screen. The percent positivity for each drug category on enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique testing was calculated. Chi-squared tests were used to compare positivity rates between years.

Results: Opiate positivity declined over the last 9 years. Positivity rates from 2020 to 2022 were 5% ± 2% vs 82% ± 6% from 2014 to 2019 ( P < 0.001) Performance of UDS also declined over time (76% from 2014 to 2019 vs 46% from 2020 to 2022; P < 0.001). UDS was more likely to be performed in patients after a suicide attempt or when presenting after illicit use (66% vs 38%; P = 0.004).

Conclusion: Opiate screen positivity decreased the last 9 years and may reflect wider use of fentanyl among this population starting in 2020.

急诊科接诊的青少年阿片类药物患者尿液药物筛查敏感性的变化。
导言:在过去十年中,青少年吸毒过量的人数一直在上升。COVID 后,因急性过量用药和青少年阿片类药物戒断而到急诊科(ED)就诊的人数都有所增加。尿液药物筛查在急诊室的实用性较差,但在医学检查和药物使用障碍患者管理中,尿液药物筛查是常规检查项目。我们的主要目标是测量鸦片类药物尿液药物检测在一段时间内对急诊室阿片类药物相关就诊者的敏感性:我们回顾了 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日期间医疗系统内所有急诊室与阿片类药物直接相关的急诊病例。对于这段时间内收治的每位患者,我们都确定了是否进行了尿液药物筛查以及筛查结果。所有医疗点提供的尿液药物筛查都是酶联免疫测定,其中包括阿片类药物筛查(吗啡抗体),但没有芬太尼筛查。计算了酶联免疫分析技术检测中各类药物的阳性率。采用卡方检验比较不同年份的阳性率:结果:鸦片剂阳性率在过去 9 年中有所下降。2020年至2022年的阳性率为5% ± 2% vs 2014年至2019年的82% ± 6%(P < 0.001),UDS的执行率也随着时间的推移而下降(2014年至2019年为76% vs 2020年至2022年为46%;P < 0.001)。自杀未遂或非法用药后就诊的患者更有可能进行 UDS(66% vs 38%;P = 0.004):结论:鸦片剂筛查阳性率在过去 9 年中有所下降,这可能反映了自 2020 年起芬太尼在这一人群中的广泛使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信