Association between video laryngoscopy characteristics and successful neonatal tracheal intubation: a prospective study.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
William Corder, Timothy Nelin, Anne M Ades, John Flibotte, Elizabeth Laverriere, Rodrigo Daly Guris, Leane Soorikian, Elizabeth E Foglia
{"title":"Association between video laryngoscopy characteristics and successful neonatal tracheal intubation: a prospective study.","authors":"William Corder, Timothy Nelin, Anne M Ades, John Flibotte, Elizabeth Laverriere, Rodrigo Daly Guris, Leane Soorikian, Elizabeth E Foglia","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2024-326992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify associations between procedural characteristics and success of neonatal tracheal intubation (NTI) using video laryngoscopy (VL).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective single-centre observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Quaternary neonatal intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Infants requiring NTI at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>VL NTI recordings were evaluated to assess 11 observable procedural characteristics hypothesised to be associated with VL NTI success. These characteristics included measures of procedural time and performance, glottic exposure and position, and laryngoscope blade tip location.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>VL NTI attempt success.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 109 patients underwent 109 intubation encounters with 164 intubation attempts. The first attempt success rate was 65%, and the overall encounter success rate was 100%. Successful VL NTI attempts were associated with shorter procedural duration (36 s vs 60 s, p<0.001) and improved Cormack-Lehane grade (63% grade I vs 49% grade II, p<0.001) compared with unsuccessful NTIs. Other factors more common in successful NTI attempts than unsuccessful attempts were laryngoscope blade placement to lift the epiglottis (45% vs 29%, p=0.002), fewer tracheal tube manoeuvres (3 vs 8, p<0.001) and a left-sided or non-visualised tongue location (76% vs 56%, p=0.009).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified procedural characteristics visible on the VL screen that are associated with NTI procedural success. Study results may improve how VL is used to teach and perform neonatal intubation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8177,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2024-326992","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To identify associations between procedural characteristics and success of neonatal tracheal intubation (NTI) using video laryngoscopy (VL).

Design: Prospective single-centre observational study.

Setting: Quaternary neonatal intensive care unit.

Patients: Infants requiring NTI at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.

Interventions: VL NTI recordings were evaluated to assess 11 observable procedural characteristics hypothesised to be associated with VL NTI success. These characteristics included measures of procedural time and performance, glottic exposure and position, and laryngoscope blade tip location.

Main outcome measure: VL NTI attempt success.

Results: A total of 109 patients underwent 109 intubation encounters with 164 intubation attempts. The first attempt success rate was 65%, and the overall encounter success rate was 100%. Successful VL NTI attempts were associated with shorter procedural duration (36 s vs 60 s, p<0.001) and improved Cormack-Lehane grade (63% grade I vs 49% grade II, p<0.001) compared with unsuccessful NTIs. Other factors more common in successful NTI attempts than unsuccessful attempts were laryngoscope blade placement to lift the epiglottis (45% vs 29%, p=0.002), fewer tracheal tube manoeuvres (3 vs 8, p<0.001) and a left-sided or non-visualised tongue location (76% vs 56%, p=0.009).

Conclusion: We identified procedural characteristics visible on the VL screen that are associated with NTI procedural success. Study results may improve how VL is used to teach and perform neonatal intubation.

视频喉镜特征与新生儿气管插管成功率之间的关系:一项前瞻性研究。
目的确定使用视频喉镜(VL)进行新生儿气管插管(NTI)的程序特征与成功率之间的关系:前瞻性单中心观察研究:环境:四级新生儿重症监护病房:费城儿童医院需要 NTI 的婴儿:对 VL NTI 记录进行评估,以评估假设与 VL NTI 成功率相关的 11 个可观察到的程序特征。这些特征包括测量程序时间和性能、声门暴露和位置以及喉镜刀尖位置:结果:结果:共有 109 名患者接受了 109 次插管,尝试了 164 次插管。首次尝试成功率为 65%,总体成功率为 100%。成功的 VL NTI 尝试与较短的程序持续时间有关(36 秒 vs 60 秒,p):我们确定了 VL 屏幕上可见的与 NTI 程序成功相关的程序特征。研究结果可改进 VL 在新生儿插管教学和操作中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Disease in Childhood is an international peer review journal that aims to keep paediatricians and others up to date with advances in the diagnosis and treatment of childhood diseases as well as advocacy issues such as child protection. It focuses on all aspects of child health and disease from the perinatal period (in the Fetal and Neonatal edition) through to adolescence. ADC includes original research reports, commentaries, reviews of clinical and policy issues, and evidence reports. Areas covered include: community child health, public health, epidemiology, acute paediatrics, advocacy, and ethics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信