Assessing Privacy Vulnerabilities in Genetic Data Sets: Scoping Review.

Mara Thomas, Nuria Mackes, Asad Preuss-Dodhy, Thomas Wieland, Markus Bundschus
{"title":"Assessing Privacy Vulnerabilities in Genetic Data Sets: Scoping Review.","authors":"Mara Thomas, Nuria Mackes, Asad Preuss-Dodhy, Thomas Wieland, Markus Bundschus","doi":"10.2196/54332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Genetic data are widely considered inherently identifiable. However, genetic data sets come in many shapes and sizes, and the feasibility of privacy attacks depends on their specific content. Assessing the reidentification risk of genetic data is complex, yet there is a lack of guidelines or recommendations that support data processors in performing such an evaluation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to gain a comprehensive understanding of the privacy vulnerabilities of genetic data and create a summary that can guide data processors in assessing the privacy risk of genetic data sets.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a 2-step search, in which we first identified 21 reviews published between 2017 and 2023 on the topic of genomic privacy and then analyzed all references cited in the reviews (n=1645) to identify 42 unique original research studies that demonstrate a privacy attack on genetic data. We then evaluated the type and components of genetic data exploited for these attacks as well as the effort and resources needed for their implementation and their probability of success.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From our literature review, we derived 9 nonmutually exclusive features of genetic data that are both inherent to any genetic data set and informative about privacy risk: biological modality, experimental assay, data format or level of processing, germline versus somatic variation content, content of single nucleotide polymorphisms, short tandem repeats, aggregated sample measures, structural variants, and rare single nucleotide variants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>On the basis of our literature review, the evaluation of these 9 features covers the great majority of privacy-critical aspects of genetic data and thus provides a foundation and guidance for assessing genetic data risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":73552,"journal":{"name":"JMIR bioinformatics and biotechnology","volume":"5 ","pages":"e54332"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11165293/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR bioinformatics and biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/54332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Genetic data are widely considered inherently identifiable. However, genetic data sets come in many shapes and sizes, and the feasibility of privacy attacks depends on their specific content. Assessing the reidentification risk of genetic data is complex, yet there is a lack of guidelines or recommendations that support data processors in performing such an evaluation.

Objective: This study aims to gain a comprehensive understanding of the privacy vulnerabilities of genetic data and create a summary that can guide data processors in assessing the privacy risk of genetic data sets.

Methods: We conducted a 2-step search, in which we first identified 21 reviews published between 2017 and 2023 on the topic of genomic privacy and then analyzed all references cited in the reviews (n=1645) to identify 42 unique original research studies that demonstrate a privacy attack on genetic data. We then evaluated the type and components of genetic data exploited for these attacks as well as the effort and resources needed for their implementation and their probability of success.

Results: From our literature review, we derived 9 nonmutually exclusive features of genetic data that are both inherent to any genetic data set and informative about privacy risk: biological modality, experimental assay, data format or level of processing, germline versus somatic variation content, content of single nucleotide polymorphisms, short tandem repeats, aggregated sample measures, structural variants, and rare single nucleotide variants.

Conclusions: On the basis of our literature review, the evaluation of these 9 features covers the great majority of privacy-critical aspects of genetic data and thus provides a foundation and guidance for assessing genetic data risk.

评估遗传数据集中的隐私漏洞:范围审查。
背景:人们普遍认为基因数据本身具有可识别性。然而,基因数据集有多种形状和大小,隐私攻击的可行性取决于其具体内容。评估基因数据的再识别风险非常复杂,但目前还缺乏支持数据处理人员进行此类评估的指南或建议:本研究旨在全面了解基因数据的隐私漏洞,并编写一份摘要,指导数据处理人员评估基因数据集的隐私风险:我们进行了两步搜索,首先确定了 2017 年至 2023 年间发表的 21 篇以基因组隐私为主题的综述,然后分析了综述中引用的所有参考文献(n=1645),确定了 42 项证明基因数据隐私攻击的独特原创研究。然后,我们评估了这些攻击所利用的基因数据的类型和组成部分,以及实施这些攻击所需的努力和资源及其成功概率:根据我们的文献综述,我们得出了基因数据的 9 个非相互排斥的特征,这些特征既是任何基因数据集的固有特征,也是隐私风险的信息来源:生物模式、实验检测、数据格式或处理水平、种系变异与体细胞变异内容、单核苷酸多态性内容、短串联重复序列、聚合样本测量、结构变异和罕见单核苷酸变异:根据我们的文献综述,对这 9 个特征的评估涵盖了基因数据中绝大多数对隐私至关重要的方面,从而为评估基因数据风险提供了基础和指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信