Value of Vitamin D Metabolite Ratios in 3 Patients as Diagnostic Criteria to Assess Vitamin D Status.

JCEM case reports Pub Date : 2024-06-28 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1210/jcemcr/luae095
Zhinous Shahidzadeh Yazdi, Elizabeth A Streeten, Hilary B Whitlatch, Salma A Bargal, Amber L Beitelshees, Simeon I Taylor
{"title":"Value of Vitamin D Metabolite Ratios in 3 Patients as Diagnostic Criteria to Assess Vitamin D Status.","authors":"Zhinous Shahidzadeh Yazdi, Elizabeth A Streeten, Hilary B Whitlatch, Salma A Bargal, Amber L Beitelshees, Simeon I Taylor","doi":"10.1210/jcemcr/luae095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although clinical guidelines recommend measuring total plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) to assess vitamin D (VitD) status, this index does not account for 3-fold inter-individual variation in VitD binding protein (VDBP) level. We present 3 individuals with total plasma 25(OH)D levels of 10.8 to 12.3 ng/mL (27-30.7 nmol/L). Because Endocrine Society guidelines define VitD deficiency as 25(OH)D ≤ 20 ng/mL (50 nmol/L), all 3 would be judged to be VitD deficient. VitD3 supplementation increased 25(OH)D to the range of 31.7 to 33.8 ng/mL (79.1-84.4 nmol/L). Patient #1 exhibited secondary hyperparathyroidism; VitD3 supplementation decreased parathyroid hormone (PTH) by 34% without a clinically significant change in PTH levels in the other 2 individuals. Thus, 25(OH)D level did not distinguish between the 1 patient who had secondary hyperparathyroidism and the 2 who did not. We therefore inquired whether VitD metabolite ratios (which are VDBP-independent) might distinguish among these 3 individuals. Of all the assessed ratios, the 1,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D/24,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D ratio was the most informative, which had a value of 102 pg/ng in the individual with secondary hyperparathyroidism but lower values (41 and 20 pg/ng) in the other 2 individuals. These cases illustrate the value of the 1,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D/24,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D ratio to provide clinically relevant information about VitD status.</p>","PeriodicalId":73540,"journal":{"name":"JCEM case reports","volume":"2 7","pages":"luae095"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11211852/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCEM case reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/jcemcr/luae095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although clinical guidelines recommend measuring total plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) to assess vitamin D (VitD) status, this index does not account for 3-fold inter-individual variation in VitD binding protein (VDBP) level. We present 3 individuals with total plasma 25(OH)D levels of 10.8 to 12.3 ng/mL (27-30.7 nmol/L). Because Endocrine Society guidelines define VitD deficiency as 25(OH)D ≤ 20 ng/mL (50 nmol/L), all 3 would be judged to be VitD deficient. VitD3 supplementation increased 25(OH)D to the range of 31.7 to 33.8 ng/mL (79.1-84.4 nmol/L). Patient #1 exhibited secondary hyperparathyroidism; VitD3 supplementation decreased parathyroid hormone (PTH) by 34% without a clinically significant change in PTH levels in the other 2 individuals. Thus, 25(OH)D level did not distinguish between the 1 patient who had secondary hyperparathyroidism and the 2 who did not. We therefore inquired whether VitD metabolite ratios (which are VDBP-independent) might distinguish among these 3 individuals. Of all the assessed ratios, the 1,25(OH)2D/24,25(OH)2D ratio was the most informative, which had a value of 102 pg/ng in the individual with secondary hyperparathyroidism but lower values (41 and 20 pg/ng) in the other 2 individuals. These cases illustrate the value of the 1,25(OH)2D/24,25(OH)2D ratio to provide clinically relevant information about VitD status.

将 3 名患者的维生素 D 代谢物比率作为评估维生素 D 状态的诊断标准的价值。
尽管临床指南建议通过测量血浆总25-羟基维生素D(25[OH]D)来评估维生素D(VitD)状态,但这一指标并没有考虑到维生素D结合蛋白(VDBP)水平3倍的个体间差异。我们介绍了 3 位血浆 25(OH)D 总水平为 10.8 至 12.3 纳克/毫升(27-30.7 毫摩尔/升)的个体。由于内分泌学会指南将维生素 D 缺乏定义为 25(OH)D ≤ 20 纳克/毫升(50 毫摩尔/升),因此这 3 人都被判定为维生素 D 缺乏。补充 VitD3 后,25(OH)D 增加到 31.7 至 33.8 纳克/毫升(79.1-84.4 毫摩尔/升)。1 号患者表现为继发性甲状旁腺功能亢进;补充 VitD3 后,甲状旁腺激素(PTH)降低了 34%,但其他 2 人的 PTH 水平没有发生有临床意义的变化。因此,25(OH)D水平并不能区分1例继发性甲状旁腺功能亢进症患者和2例非继发性甲状旁腺功能亢进症患者。因此,我们询问了维生素D代谢物比率(与VDBP无关)是否能区分这3人。在所有评估的比率中,1,25(OH)2D/24,25(OH)2D 比率最具参考价值,在患有继发性甲状旁腺功能亢进症的患者中,该比率值为 102 pg/ng,而在另外两名患者中,该比率值则较低(分别为 41 和 20 pg/ng)。这些病例说明,1,25(OH)2D/24,25(OH)2D 比值可提供有关维生素 D 状态的临床相关信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信