Motivational Interviewing: Addressing Interest Among Health Professions Students.

PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.) Pub Date : 2024-06-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.22454/PRiMER.2024.823357
Aurianna M Lajaunie, Natalie M Vela, Hannah Kimmel Supron, Sarah Small, Kenneth Resnicow, P Elainee Poling
{"title":"Motivational Interviewing: Addressing Interest Among Health Professions Students.","authors":"Aurianna M Lajaunie, Natalie M Vela, Hannah Kimmel Supron, Sarah Small, Kenneth Resnicow, P Elainee Poling","doi":"10.22454/PRiMER.2024.823357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Motivational interviewing (MI) is a patient-centered approach to behavior change counseling that is used among health professionals across multiple disciplines. However, MI training has yet to be broadly offered to health professional (HP) students. This study aimed to evaluate student interest in MI and the efficacy of an MI workshop to assess whether MI training should be incorporated into HP curricula.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a needs assessment to evaluate HP student interest in learning MI. We then hosted a 6.5-hour MI workshop, followed by optional standardized patient encounters (SPEs). SPE performance was evaluated with a scored competency assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Needs assessment respondents (N=93) were predominantly medical students (53%), of which 49% were interested in primary care-related fields. Most (58%) reported receiving 0 to 2 hours of MI training in their required curricula, yet 87% intended to use MI and were interested in receiving training. Nineteen students attended the MI workshop. Postworkshop knowledge assessment (N=11) improved by an average of 34% (premean [±SD], 41% [±12]; postmean [±SD], 75% [±10]; <i>P</i><.001). The SPE mean competency score (5.09) surpassed the threshold for competence of 5.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HP students reported receiving minimal MI training in their curricula despite being highly interested in MI. Interested students responded to our interdisciplinary MI workshop and SPEs with high satisfaction, suggesting that HP schools may benefit from incorporating MI into their curricula. Nevertheless, response rates were low, and selection bias may have skewed responses toward more favorable perceptions of MI.</p>","PeriodicalId":74494,"journal":{"name":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","volume":"8 ","pages":"35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11212694/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/PRiMER.2024.823357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Motivational interviewing (MI) is a patient-centered approach to behavior change counseling that is used among health professionals across multiple disciplines. However, MI training has yet to be broadly offered to health professional (HP) students. This study aimed to evaluate student interest in MI and the efficacy of an MI workshop to assess whether MI training should be incorporated into HP curricula.

Methods: We conducted a needs assessment to evaluate HP student interest in learning MI. We then hosted a 6.5-hour MI workshop, followed by optional standardized patient encounters (SPEs). SPE performance was evaluated with a scored competency assessment.

Results: Needs assessment respondents (N=93) were predominantly medical students (53%), of which 49% were interested in primary care-related fields. Most (58%) reported receiving 0 to 2 hours of MI training in their required curricula, yet 87% intended to use MI and were interested in receiving training. Nineteen students attended the MI workshop. Postworkshop knowledge assessment (N=11) improved by an average of 34% (premean [±SD], 41% [±12]; postmean [±SD], 75% [±10]; P<.001). The SPE mean competency score (5.09) surpassed the threshold for competence of 5.

Conclusions: HP students reported receiving minimal MI training in their curricula despite being highly interested in MI. Interested students responded to our interdisciplinary MI workshop and SPEs with high satisfaction, suggesting that HP schools may benefit from incorporating MI into their curricula. Nevertheless, response rates were low, and selection bias may have skewed responses toward more favorable perceptions of MI.

动机访谈:解决卫生专业学生的兴趣问题。
背景和目的:动机访谈法(MI)是一种以患者为中心的行为改变咨询方法,被多个学科的卫生专业人员所采用。然而,激励访谈培训尚未广泛提供给卫生专业(HP)学生。本研究旨在评估学生对多元智能的兴趣以及多元智能研讨会的效果,从而评估是否应将多元智能培训纳入卫生专业课程:方法:我们进行了需求评估,以评估卫生专业学生对学习多元智能的兴趣。然后,我们举办了一个 6.5 小时的多元智能讲习班,随后进行了可选的标准化病人会诊 (SPE)。SPE的成绩由能力评估打分进行评估:需求评估受访者(93 人)主要是医科学生(53%),其中 49% 对初级保健相关领域感兴趣。大多数学生(58%)表示在必修课程中接受过 0 到 2 个小时的多元智能培训,但 87% 的学生打算使用多元智能并有兴趣接受培训。19 名学生参加了多元智能研讨会。工作坊后的知识评估(11 人)平均提高了 34%(工作坊前平均值[±SD],41%[±12];工作坊后平均值[±SD],75%[±10];PC 结论:尽管惠普学生对多元智能非常感兴趣,但他们表示在课程中接受的多元智能培训极少。有兴趣的学生对我们举办的跨学科多元智能研讨会和SPE的满意度很高,这表明,将多元智能纳入课程可能会使惠普学校受益。然而,回应率较低,选择偏差可能会使回应偏向于对多元智能更有利的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信