The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the functional mobility scale in patients with cerebral palsy.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Göktuğ Karataş, Ebru Şahin, Nihan Erdinç Gündüz, Özlem El, Ali Karakaş, Özlen Peker
{"title":"The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the functional mobility scale in patients with cerebral palsy.","authors":"Göktuğ Karataş, Ebru Şahin, Nihan Erdinç Gündüz, Özlem El, Ali Karakaş, Özlen Peker","doi":"10.5606/tftrd.2024.13359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> The aim of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Functional Mobility Scale (FMS) in patients with cerebral palsy. <b>Patients and methods:</b> The validity and reliability study was conducted with 100 cerebral palsy patients (66 males, 34 females; mean age: 6.4±2.7 years; range, 2 to 18 years) between July 2015 and July 2018. The translation of the FMS was performed according to international standards. For test-retest reliability, 54 patients were reevaluated one week after the initial test with the Turkish version of the FMS, and Cohen's weighted kappa values were analyzed. The validity of the scale was assessed by correlating the FMS with the Gross Motor Function Classification System and the Gillette Functional Assessment Questionnaire Walking Scale. Twenty patients were evaluated by two researchers for interobserver reliability. <b>Results:</b> The kappa coefficients for test-retest reliability were 0.90 for FMS 5 m, 0.92 for FMS 50 m, and 0.91 for FMS 500 m. An evaluation of the validity revealed a significant correlation between FMS and the Gross Motor Function Classification System for all distances (r=-0.95, r=-0.96, and r=-0.92 for 5, 50, and 500 m, respectively; p <0.001), as well as the Gillette Functional Assessment Questionnaire Walking Scale (r=-0.95, r=-0.94, and r=-0.91 for 5, 50, and 500 meters, respectively; p <0.001). The kappa coefficients related to interobserver reliability were 0.73 for 5 m, 0.69 for FMS 50 m, and 0.81 for FMS 500 m. <b>Conclusion:</b> The Turkish version of the FMS can be considered a valid and reliable instrument for the assessment of cerebral palsy patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":56043,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"70 2","pages":"188-196"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11209331/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2024.13359","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Functional Mobility Scale (FMS) in patients with cerebral palsy. Patients and methods: The validity and reliability study was conducted with 100 cerebral palsy patients (66 males, 34 females; mean age: 6.4±2.7 years; range, 2 to 18 years) between July 2015 and July 2018. The translation of the FMS was performed according to international standards. For test-retest reliability, 54 patients were reevaluated one week after the initial test with the Turkish version of the FMS, and Cohen's weighted kappa values were analyzed. The validity of the scale was assessed by correlating the FMS with the Gross Motor Function Classification System and the Gillette Functional Assessment Questionnaire Walking Scale. Twenty patients were evaluated by two researchers for interobserver reliability. Results: The kappa coefficients for test-retest reliability were 0.90 for FMS 5 m, 0.92 for FMS 50 m, and 0.91 for FMS 500 m. An evaluation of the validity revealed a significant correlation between FMS and the Gross Motor Function Classification System for all distances (r=-0.95, r=-0.96, and r=-0.92 for 5, 50, and 500 m, respectively; p <0.001), as well as the Gillette Functional Assessment Questionnaire Walking Scale (r=-0.95, r=-0.94, and r=-0.91 for 5, 50, and 500 meters, respectively; p <0.001). The kappa coefficients related to interobserver reliability were 0.73 for 5 m, 0.69 for FMS 50 m, and 0.81 for FMS 500 m. Conclusion: The Turkish version of the FMS can be considered a valid and reliable instrument for the assessment of cerebral palsy patients.

土耳其版脑瘫患者功能移动量表的有效性和可靠性。
研究目的本研究旨在调查土耳其版功能移动量表(FMS)在脑瘫患者中的有效性和可靠性。患者和方法2015年7月至2018年7月期间,对100名脑瘫患者(66名男性,34名女性;平均年龄:6.4±2.7岁;范围:2至18岁)进行了有效性和可靠性研究。FMS 的翻译按照国际标准进行。为了获得重测可靠性,54 名患者在首次测试一周后使用土耳其版 FMS 进行了重新评估,并分析了科恩加权卡帕值。通过将 FMS 与粗大运动功能分类系统(Gross Motor Function Classification System)和吉列功能评估问卷行走量表(Gillette Functional Assessment Questionnaire Walking Scale)相关联,对量表的有效性进行了评估。由两名研究人员对 20 名患者进行评估,以确定观察者之间的可靠性。结果显示测试-重复测试可靠性的卡帕系数分别为:FMS 5 米 0.90、FMS 50 米 0.92 和 FMS 500 米 0.91。有效性评估显示,FMS 和粗大运动功能分类系统在所有距离上都存在显著相关性(5 米、50 米和 500 米的相关性分别为 r=-0.95、r=-0.96 和 r=-0.92;p 结论:土耳其语版 FMS 可用于对患者进行粗大运动功能评估:土耳其版 FMS 可被视为评估脑瘫患者的有效而可靠的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Formerly published as Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi) is the official journal of the Turkish Society of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. The journal is an international open-access, double-blind peer-reviewed periodical journal bringing the latest developments in all aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation, and related fields. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, editorials, case reports (limited), letters to the editors. The target readership includes academic members, specialists, residents working in the fields of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. The language of the journal is English and it is published quarterly (in March, June, September, and December).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信