Patient- and Provider-Level Factors Associated with Patient Portal Usage Among Medicaid Recipients.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Telemedicine and e-Health Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-28 DOI:10.1089/tmj.2024.0194
Omolola E Adepoju, Summer Chavez, Gabriella Tavera, Andy Castaneda
{"title":"Patient- and Provider-Level Factors Associated with Patient Portal Usage Among Medicaid Recipients.","authors":"Omolola E Adepoju, Summer Chavez, Gabriella Tavera, Andy Castaneda","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2024.0194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Patient portals can improve access to electronic health information and enhance patient engagement. However, disparities in patient portal utilization remain, affecting disadvantaged communities disproportionately. This study examined patient- and provider-level factors associated with portal usage among Medicaid recipients in a large federally qualified health center (FQHC) network in Texas. <b>Methods:</b> Deidentified electronic medical records of patients 18 years or older from a large Texas FQHC network were analyzed. The dependent variable was a binary flag indicating portal usage during the study period. Independent variables included patient- and provider-level factors. Patient-level factors included sociodemographic, geographic, and clinical characteristics. Provider characteristics included primary service line, provider type, provider language, and years in practice. Because the analysis was at the individual level, a multivariable logistic regression model focused on adjusted associations between independent variables and portal usage. <b>Results:</b> The analytic sample consisted of 9,271 individuals. Compared with individuals 18-39 years, patients 50 years and older had lower odds (50-64 OR: 0.60, <i>p</i> < 0.001; 65+ OR: 0.51, <i>p</i> < 0.001) of portal usage. Males were less likely to use portals (OR: 0.44, <i>p</i> = 0.03), and compared to Non-Hispanic Whites, Non-Hispanic Black (OR: 0.86, <i>p</i> = 0.02) and Hispanics (OR: 0.83, <i>p</i> < 0.001) were significantly less likely to use portals. Individuals with 1 or more telemedicine consults had a two-times greater odds of portal usage (OR: 1.97, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Compared to individuals who had clinic visits in December 2018, portal usage was significantly higher in the pandemic months (March 2020-November 2020, all <i>p</i>'s < 0.01). Importantly, the behavioral health service line had the greatest odds (OR: 1.52, <i>p</i> < 0.001), whereas the dental service line had the lowest odds (OR: 0.69, <i>p</i> = 0.01) compared to family practice. No other provider characteristics were significant. <b>Conclusion:</b> Our finding of significant patient-level factors is important and can contribute to developing appropriate patient-focused health information technology approaches to ensure equitable access and maximize the potential benefits of patient portals in health care delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":54434,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine and e-Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine and e-Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2024.0194","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patient portals can improve access to electronic health information and enhance patient engagement. However, disparities in patient portal utilization remain, affecting disadvantaged communities disproportionately. This study examined patient- and provider-level factors associated with portal usage among Medicaid recipients in a large federally qualified health center (FQHC) network in Texas. Methods: Deidentified electronic medical records of patients 18 years or older from a large Texas FQHC network were analyzed. The dependent variable was a binary flag indicating portal usage during the study period. Independent variables included patient- and provider-level factors. Patient-level factors included sociodemographic, geographic, and clinical characteristics. Provider characteristics included primary service line, provider type, provider language, and years in practice. Because the analysis was at the individual level, a multivariable logistic regression model focused on adjusted associations between independent variables and portal usage. Results: The analytic sample consisted of 9,271 individuals. Compared with individuals 18-39 years, patients 50 years and older had lower odds (50-64 OR: 0.60, p < 0.001; 65+ OR: 0.51, p < 0.001) of portal usage. Males were less likely to use portals (OR: 0.44, p = 0.03), and compared to Non-Hispanic Whites, Non-Hispanic Black (OR: 0.86, p = 0.02) and Hispanics (OR: 0.83, p < 0.001) were significantly less likely to use portals. Individuals with 1 or more telemedicine consults had a two-times greater odds of portal usage (OR: 1.97, p < 0.001). Compared to individuals who had clinic visits in December 2018, portal usage was significantly higher in the pandemic months (March 2020-November 2020, all p's < 0.01). Importantly, the behavioral health service line had the greatest odds (OR: 1.52, p < 0.001), whereas the dental service line had the lowest odds (OR: 0.69, p = 0.01) compared to family practice. No other provider characteristics were significant. Conclusion: Our finding of significant patient-level factors is important and can contribute to developing appropriate patient-focused health information technology approaches to ensure equitable access and maximize the potential benefits of patient portals in health care delivery.

与医疗补助受益人使用患者门户网站相关的患者和医疗服务提供者层面的因素。
背景:患者门户网站可以改善电子健康信息的获取,提高患者的参与度。然而,患者门户网站使用率的差异依然存在,对弱势群体的影响尤为严重。本研究调查了德克萨斯州一个大型联邦合格医疗中心(FQHC)网络中与医疗补助受益人使用门户网站相关的患者和医疗服务提供者层面的因素。研究方法:对德克萨斯州一个大型 FQHC 网络中 18 岁及以上患者的去身份化电子病历进行了分析。因变量是一个二进制标志,表示在研究期间门户网站的使用情况。自变量包括患者和医疗服务提供者层面的因素。患者层面的因素包括社会人口、地理和临床特征。医疗服务提供者特征包括主要服务项目、医疗服务提供者类型、医疗服务提供者语言和从业年限。由于分析是在个人层面上进行的,因此多变量逻辑回归模型侧重于调整自变量与门户网站使用之间的关联。结果:分析样本包括 9271 人。与 18-39 岁的患者相比,50 岁及以上的患者使用门户网站的几率较低(50-64 岁 OR:0.60,p < 0.001;65 岁以上 OR:0.51,p < 0.001)。男性使用门户网站的几率较低(OR:0.44,p = 0.03),与非西班牙裔白人相比,非西班牙裔黑人(OR:0.86,p = 0.02)和西班牙裔美国人(OR:0.83,p < 0.001)使用门户网站的几率明显较低。接受过 1 次或 1 次以上远程医疗会诊的患者使用门户网站的几率是接受过 1 次或 1 次以上远程医疗会诊的患者的两倍(OR:1.97,p < 0.001)。与 2018 年 12 月出诊的个人相比,门户网站的使用率在大流行月份(2020 年 3 月至 2020 年 11 月,所有 p 均小于 0.01)明显更高。重要的是,与家庭医生相比,行为健康服务项目的几率最大(OR:1.52,p < 0.001),而牙科服务项目的几率最低(OR:0.69,p = 0.01)。其他医疗服务提供者的特征均不显著。结论我们在患者层面发现的重要因素非常重要,有助于开发适当的以患者为中心的医疗信息技术方法,以确保公平的就医机会,并最大限度地发挥患者门户网站在医疗服务中的潜在优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Telemedicine and e-Health
Telemedicine and e-Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
6.40%
发文量
270
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Telemedicine and e-Health is the leading peer-reviewed journal for cutting-edge telemedicine applications for achieving optimal patient care and outcomes. It places special emphasis on the impact of telemedicine on the quality, cost effectiveness, and access to healthcare. Telemedicine applications play an increasingly important role in health care. They offer indispensable tools for home healthcare, remote patient monitoring, and disease management, not only for rural health and battlefield care, but also for nursing home, assisted living facilities, and maritime and aviation settings. Telemedicine and e-Health offers timely coverage of the advances in technology that offer practitioners, medical centers, and hospitals new and innovative options for managing patient care, electronic records, and medical billing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信