Human milk composition and infant anthropometrics: overview of a systematic review with clinical and research implications.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Meghan B Azad, Meredith M Brockway, Sarah M Reyes
{"title":"Human milk composition and infant anthropometrics: overview of a systematic review with clinical and research implications.","authors":"Meghan B Azad, Meredith M Brockway, Sarah M Reyes","doi":"10.1186/s13006-024-00652-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite global public health organizations endorsing breastfeeding or human milk (HM) as the optimal source of nutrition for infants, detailed knowledge of how HM composition influences infant growth is lacking. In this commentary we summarize and interpret the key findings of a large systematic review on HM components and child growth (N = 141 articles included). We highlight the most consistent associations, discuss study quality issues, explore socio-economic and time trends in this body of research, and identify gaps and future research directions.</p><p><strong>Key findings of systematic review: </strong>We grouped HM components into three categories: micronutrients (28 articles), macronutrients (57 articles), and bioactives (75 articles). Overall, we struggled to find consistent associations between HM components and infant growth. The majority of studies (85%) were of moderate or low-quality, with inconsistent HM collection and analysis strategies being identified as the most substantial quality concerns. Additional quality issues included failing to account for potential confounding by factors such as breastfeeding exclusivity and maternal body mass index.</p><p><strong>Considerations for future human milk research: </strong>Many opportunities exist for the future of HM research. Using untargeted metabolomics will expand our understanding of HM components beyond previously defined and well-understood components. Machine learning will allow researchers to investigate HM as an integrated system, rather than a collection of individual components. Future research on HM composition should incorporate evidence-based HM sampling strategies to encompass circadian variation as well as infant consumption. Additionally, researchers need to focus on developing high quality growth data using consistent growth metrics and definitions. Building multidisciplinary research teams will help to ensure that outcomes are meaningful and clinically relevant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite a large body of literature, there is limited quality evidence on the relationship between HM composition and infant growth. Future research should engage in more accurate collection of breastfeeding data, use standardized HM collection strategies and employ assays that are validated for HM. By systematically evaluating the existing literature and identifying gaps in existing research methods and practice, we hope to inspire standardized methods and reporting guidelines to support robust strategies for examining relationships between HM composition and child growth.</p>","PeriodicalId":54266,"journal":{"name":"International Breastfeeding Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11214210/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Breastfeeding Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-024-00652-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite global public health organizations endorsing breastfeeding or human milk (HM) as the optimal source of nutrition for infants, detailed knowledge of how HM composition influences infant growth is lacking. In this commentary we summarize and interpret the key findings of a large systematic review on HM components and child growth (N = 141 articles included). We highlight the most consistent associations, discuss study quality issues, explore socio-economic and time trends in this body of research, and identify gaps and future research directions.

Key findings of systematic review: We grouped HM components into three categories: micronutrients (28 articles), macronutrients (57 articles), and bioactives (75 articles). Overall, we struggled to find consistent associations between HM components and infant growth. The majority of studies (85%) were of moderate or low-quality, with inconsistent HM collection and analysis strategies being identified as the most substantial quality concerns. Additional quality issues included failing to account for potential confounding by factors such as breastfeeding exclusivity and maternal body mass index.

Considerations for future human milk research: Many opportunities exist for the future of HM research. Using untargeted metabolomics will expand our understanding of HM components beyond previously defined and well-understood components. Machine learning will allow researchers to investigate HM as an integrated system, rather than a collection of individual components. Future research on HM composition should incorporate evidence-based HM sampling strategies to encompass circadian variation as well as infant consumption. Additionally, researchers need to focus on developing high quality growth data using consistent growth metrics and definitions. Building multidisciplinary research teams will help to ensure that outcomes are meaningful and clinically relevant.

Conclusion: Despite a large body of literature, there is limited quality evidence on the relationship between HM composition and infant growth. Future research should engage in more accurate collection of breastfeeding data, use standardized HM collection strategies and employ assays that are validated for HM. By systematically evaluating the existing literature and identifying gaps in existing research methods and practice, we hope to inspire standardized methods and reporting guidelines to support robust strategies for examining relationships between HM composition and child growth.

母乳成分与婴儿人体测量学:具有临床和研究意义的系统综述。
背景:尽管全球公共卫生组织都认可母乳喂养或母乳(HM)是婴儿的最佳营养来源,但对母乳成分如何影响婴儿生长却缺乏详细的了解。在这篇评论中,我们总结并解读了关于母乳成分与儿童生长的大型系统综述的主要发现(共收录 141 篇文章)。我们强调了最一致的关联,讨论了研究质量问题,探讨了这一研究中的社会经济和时间趋势,并指出了差距和未来的研究方向:我们将 HM 成分分为三类:微量营养素(28 篇文章)、宏量营养素(57 篇文章)和生物活性成分(75 篇文章)。总体而言,我们很难发现保健品成分与婴儿生长之间存在一致的联系。大多数研究(85%)的质量为中等或低等,其中不一致的 HM 采集和分析策略被认为是最严重的质量问题。其他质量问题还包括未能考虑到母乳喂养排他性和产妇体重指数等因素可能造成的混淆:未来的母乳研究将面临许多机遇。使用非靶向代谢组学将扩大我们对母乳成分的了解,使其超越以前定义和了解的成分。机器学习将使研究人员能够将 HM 作为一个综合系统进行研究,而不是将其作为单个成分的集合。未来有关 HM 成分的研究应采用基于证据的 HM 采样策略,以涵盖昼夜节律变化和婴儿消耗。此外,研究人员还需要重点利用一致的生长指标和定义来开发高质量的生长数据。建立多学科研究团队将有助于确保研究结果的意义和临床相关性:尽管文献数量众多,但有关 HM 成分与婴儿生长之间关系的高质量证据却很有限。未来的研究应更准确地收集母乳喂养数据,使用标准化的 HM 收集策略,并采用经过验证的 HM 检测方法。我们希望通过系统地评估现有文献,找出现有研究方法和实践中的不足,从而激发标准化方法和报告指南,为研究 HM 成分与儿童生长之间关系的有力策略提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Breastfeeding Journal
International Breastfeeding Journal Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
76
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊介绍: Breastfeeding is recognized as an important public health issue with enormous social and economic implications. Infants who do not receive breast milk are likely to experience poorer health outcomes than breastfed infants; mothers who do not breastfeed increase their own health risks. Publications on the topic of breastfeeding are wide ranging. Articles about breastfeeding are currently published journals focused on nursing, midwifery, paediatric, obstetric, family medicine, public health, immunology, physiology, sociology and many other topics. In addition, electronic publishing allows fast publication time for authors and Open Access ensures the journal is easily accessible to readers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信