Stakeholder perceptions of cervical screening accessibility and attendance in Ireland: a qualitative study.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Sophie Mulcahy Symmons, Amanda Drury, Aoife De Brún
{"title":"Stakeholder perceptions of cervical screening accessibility and attendance in Ireland: a qualitative study.","authors":"Sophie Mulcahy Symmons, Amanda Drury, Aoife De Brún","doi":"10.1093/heapro/daae072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Organized cervical screening programmes are commonplace in high-income countries. To provide an equitable cervical screening service, it is important to understand who is and is not attending screening and why. Promotion of screening and service improvement is not possible without recognition and identification of the barriers and needs of communities that are less engaged with screening. This study explored stakeholder perceptions of cervical screening attendance and accessibility in Ireland. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 healthcare professionals, policymakers and academics. Interviews were conducted online in 2022. Reflexive thematic analysis was used inductively to generate themes, supported by NVivo. Three themes were developed: (i) getting the right information out the right way, (ii) acceptability and accessibility of screening and (iii) trying to identify and reach the non-attenders. Participants felt public knowledge of cervical screening and human papilloma virus was low and communication strategies were not adequate. Individual, cultural, structural and service-level factors influenced the accessibility and acceptability of screening. Identifying and reaching non-attenders was considered challenging and community outreach could support those less likely to attend screening. Stakeholder perspectives were valuable in understanding the complexities of screening accessibility and attendance from individual to service-level factors. Cultural competency training, inclusive language and visual cues in waiting rooms would support engagement with some populations who may be hesitant to attend screening. Collaboration with community organizations has opportunities to promote screening and understand the needs of those less likely to attend screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":54256,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion International","volume":"39 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11214098/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daae072","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Organized cervical screening programmes are commonplace in high-income countries. To provide an equitable cervical screening service, it is important to understand who is and is not attending screening and why. Promotion of screening and service improvement is not possible without recognition and identification of the barriers and needs of communities that are less engaged with screening. This study explored stakeholder perceptions of cervical screening attendance and accessibility in Ireland. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 healthcare professionals, policymakers and academics. Interviews were conducted online in 2022. Reflexive thematic analysis was used inductively to generate themes, supported by NVivo. Three themes were developed: (i) getting the right information out the right way, (ii) acceptability and accessibility of screening and (iii) trying to identify and reach the non-attenders. Participants felt public knowledge of cervical screening and human papilloma virus was low and communication strategies were not adequate. Individual, cultural, structural and service-level factors influenced the accessibility and acceptability of screening. Identifying and reaching non-attenders was considered challenging and community outreach could support those less likely to attend screening. Stakeholder perspectives were valuable in understanding the complexities of screening accessibility and attendance from individual to service-level factors. Cultural competency training, inclusive language and visual cues in waiting rooms would support engagement with some populations who may be hesitant to attend screening. Collaboration with community organizations has opportunities to promote screening and understand the needs of those less likely to attend screening.

利益相关者对爱尔兰宫颈癌筛查可及性和就诊率的看法:一项定性研究。
有组织的宫颈筛查计划在高收入国家非常普遍。要想提供公平的宫颈筛查服务,就必须了解哪些人参加了筛查,哪些人没有参加筛查,原因是什么。如果不认识和识别较少参与筛查的社区的障碍和需求,就不可能推广筛查和改善服务。本研究探讨了利益相关者对爱尔兰宫颈筛查参加率和可及性的看法。对 12 名医疗保健专业人员、政策制定者和学者进行了半结构化访谈。访谈于 2022 年在网上进行。在 NVivo 的支持下,采用了归纳式反思主题分析法来生成主题。形成了三个主题:(i) 以正确的方式发布正确的信息;(ii) 筛查的可接受性和可及性;(iii) 尝试识别和接触未参加筛查者。与会者认为,公众对宫颈癌筛查和人类乳头瘤病毒的了解较少,传播策略也不够充分。个人、文化、结构和服务层面的因素影响了筛查的可及性和可接受性。与会者认为,识别和接触未参加筛查者具有挑战性,而社区外展活动可以为那些不太可能参加筛查的人提供支持。利益相关者的观点对于理解筛查可及性和就诊率的复杂性(从个人因素到服务层面因素)非常有价值。候诊室中的文化能力培训、包容性语言和视觉提示将有助于某些可能对参加筛查犹豫不决的人群参与筛查。与社区组织合作可促进筛查,并了解不太可能参加筛查的人群的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Promotion International
Health Promotion International Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: Health Promotion International contains refereed original articles, reviews, and debate articles on major themes and innovations in the health promotion field. In line with the remits of the series of global conferences on health promotion the journal expressly invites contributions from sectors beyond health. These may include education, employment, government, the media, industry, environmental agencies, and community networks. As the thought journal of the international health promotion movement we seek in particular theoretical, methodological and activist advances to the field. Thus, the journal provides a unique focal point for articles of high quality that describe not only theories and concepts, research projects and policy formulation, but also planned and spontaneous activities, organizational change, as well as social and environmental development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信