Clinical characteristics and outcomes associated with culture-negative status in limb osteomyelitis patients.

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Hongri Wu, Xiaohua Wang, Jie Shen, Zhiyuan Wei, Shulin Wang, Tianming Xu, Fei Luo, Zhao Xie
{"title":"Clinical characteristics and outcomes associated with culture-negative status in limb osteomyelitis patients.","authors":"Hongri Wu, Xiaohua Wang, Jie Shen, Zhiyuan Wei, Shulin Wang, Tianming Xu, Fei Luo, Zhao Xie","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B7.BJJ-2023-0778.R2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and outcomes associated with culture-negative limb osteomyelitis patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1,047 limb osteomyelitis patients aged 18 years or older who underwent debridement and intraoperative culture at our clinic centre from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2020 were included. Patient characteristics, infection eradication, and complications were analyzed between culture-negative and culture-positive cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of these patients, 264 (25.2%) had negative cultures. Patients with a culture-negative compared with a culture-positive status were more likely to have the following characteristics: younger age (≤ 40 years) (113/264 (42.8%) vs 257/783 (32.8%); p = 0.004), a haematogenous aetiology (75/264 (28.4%) vs 150/783 (19.2%); p = 0.002), Cierny-Mader host A (79/264 (29.9%) vs 142/783 (18.1%); p < 0.001), antibiotic use before sampling (34/264 (12.9%) vs 41/783 (5.2%); p<0.001), fewer taken samples (n<3) (48/264 (18.2%) vs 60/783 (7.7%); p<0.001), and less frequent presentation with a sinus (156/264 (59.1%) vs 665/783 (84.9%); p < 0.001). After initial treatments of first-debridement and antimicrobial, infection eradication was inferior in culture-positive osteomyelitis patients, with a 2.24-fold increase (odds ratio 2.24 (95% confidence interval 1.42 to 3.52)) in the redebridement rate following multivariate analysis. No statistically significant differences were found in long-term recurrence and complications within the two-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified several factors being associated with the culture-negative result in osteomyelitis patients. In addition, the data also indicate that culture negativity is a positive prognostic factor in early infection eradication. These results constitute the basis of optimizing clinical management and patient consultations.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"106-B 7","pages":"720-727"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.106B7.BJJ-2023-0778.R2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and outcomes associated with culture-negative limb osteomyelitis patients.

Methods: A total of 1,047 limb osteomyelitis patients aged 18 years or older who underwent debridement and intraoperative culture at our clinic centre from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2020 were included. Patient characteristics, infection eradication, and complications were analyzed between culture-negative and culture-positive cohorts.

Results: Of these patients, 264 (25.2%) had negative cultures. Patients with a culture-negative compared with a culture-positive status were more likely to have the following characteristics: younger age (≤ 40 years) (113/264 (42.8%) vs 257/783 (32.8%); p = 0.004), a haematogenous aetiology (75/264 (28.4%) vs 150/783 (19.2%); p = 0.002), Cierny-Mader host A (79/264 (29.9%) vs 142/783 (18.1%); p < 0.001), antibiotic use before sampling (34/264 (12.9%) vs 41/783 (5.2%); p<0.001), fewer taken samples (n<3) (48/264 (18.2%) vs 60/783 (7.7%); p<0.001), and less frequent presentation with a sinus (156/264 (59.1%) vs 665/783 (84.9%); p < 0.001). After initial treatments of first-debridement and antimicrobial, infection eradication was inferior in culture-positive osteomyelitis patients, with a 2.24-fold increase (odds ratio 2.24 (95% confidence interval 1.42 to 3.52)) in the redebridement rate following multivariate analysis. No statistically significant differences were found in long-term recurrence and complications within the two-year follow-up.

Conclusion: We identified several factors being associated with the culture-negative result in osteomyelitis patients. In addition, the data also indicate that culture negativity is a positive prognostic factor in early infection eradication. These results constitute the basis of optimizing clinical management and patient consultations.

与肢体骨髓炎患者培养阴性状态相关的临床特征和预后。
目的:本研究旨在探讨培养阴性的四肢骨髓炎患者的临床特征和相关预后:研究纳入了 2011 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日期间在本诊所中心接受清创术和术中培养的 1,047 名年龄在 18 岁或以上的四肢骨髓炎患者。对培养阴性和培养阳性两组患者的特征、感染根除情况和并发症进行了分析:结果:在这些患者中,264 人(25.2%)的培养结果为阴性。与培养阳性患者相比,培养阴性患者更有可能具有以下特征:年龄较小(≤ 40 岁)(113/264 (42.8%) vs 257/783 (32.8%);p = 0.004)、血源性病因(75/264 (28.4%) vs 150/783 (19.2%);p = 0.002)、Cierny-Mader 宿主 A(79/264 (29. 9%) vs 142/783(19.2%);p = 0.003)、Cierny-Mader 宿主 A(79/264 (29.9% vs 142/783 (18.1%);p<0.001)、采样前使用抗生素(34/264 (12.9%) vs 41/783 (5.2%);p<0.001)、采样较少(n<3)(48/264 (18.2%) vs 60/783 (7.7%);p<0.001),出现窦的次数较少(156/264 (59.1%) vs 665/783 (84.9%);p<0.001)。经过首次清创和抗菌治疗后,培养阳性骨髓炎患者的感染根除率较低,经多变量分析后,重新清创率增加了 2.24 倍(几率比 2.24(95% 置信区间 1.42 至 3.52))。在两年的随访中,长期复发率和并发症方面没有发现明显的统计学差异:结论:我们发现了与骨髓炎患者培养阴性结果相关的几个因素。此外,数据还表明,培养阴性是早期根除感染的积极预后因素。这些结果为优化临床管理和患者咨询提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Journal
Bone & Joint Journal ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.90%
发文量
318
期刊介绍: We welcome original articles from any part of the world. The papers are assessed by members of the Editorial Board and our international panel of expert reviewers, then either accepted for publication or rejected by the Editor. We receive over 2000 submissions each year and accept about 250 for publication, many after revisions recommended by the reviewers, editors or statistical advisers. A decision usually takes between six and eight weeks. Each paper is assessed by two reviewers with a special interest in the subject covered by the paper, and also by members of the editorial team. Controversial papers will be discussed at a full meeting of the Editorial Board. Publication is between four and six months after acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信