Virtual reality-based therapy for chronic low back and neck pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Juan Manuel Henríquez-Jurado, María Catalina Osuna-Pérez, Héctor García-López, Rafael Lomas-Vega, María Del Carmen López-Ruiz, Esteban Obrero-Gaitán, Irene Cortés-Pérez
{"title":"Virtual reality-based therapy for chronic low back and neck pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis.","authors":"Juan Manuel Henríquez-Jurado, María Catalina Osuna-Pérez, Héctor García-López, Rafael Lomas-Vega, María Del Carmen López-Ruiz, Esteban Obrero-Gaitán, Irene Cortés-Pérez","doi":"10.1530/EOR-23-0197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compile all the scientific evidence available to date to evaluate the effect of virtual reality based therapy (VRBT) on reducing pain intensity, kinesiophobia, and associated disability, and on increasing the hr-QoL in patients with chronic neck pain (CNP) or chronic low back pain (CLBP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies published in PubMed Medline, SCOPUS, Web of Science, CINAHL Complete, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) up to June 2023 were searched. All searches followed the PICOS Framework. Two authors independently screened the studies found in the searches. Any differences of opinion regarding the selection of studies were settled by a third author.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five RCTs, published between 2013 and 2022, providing data from 1261 patients (20 RCTs) with CLBP and 261 patients (five RCTs) with CNP, were included. In reducing pain intensity for patients with CLBP, meta-analyses showed that VRBT is effective in reducing pain just to the end of the intervention, and this effect could be maintained 1 and 6 months after the therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VRBT was found to be better than therapeutic exercise (TE), sham, and no intervention (NI), showing a major effect when VRBT was used as a complementary therapy to conventional physiotherapy (CPT). Further, VRBT showed an immediate effect and immersive VRBT was the most adequate VRBT modality in reducing pain in CNP patients. No differences were found between non-immersive VRBT and immersive VRBT in reducing pain, kinesiophobia, disability, and hr-QoL in patients with CLBP.</p>","PeriodicalId":48598,"journal":{"name":"Efort Open Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11297406/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Efort Open Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-23-0197","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compile all the scientific evidence available to date to evaluate the effect of virtual reality based therapy (VRBT) on reducing pain intensity, kinesiophobia, and associated disability, and on increasing the hr-QoL in patients with chronic neck pain (CNP) or chronic low back pain (CLBP).

Methods: Studies published in PubMed Medline, SCOPUS, Web of Science, CINAHL Complete, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) up to June 2023 were searched. All searches followed the PICOS Framework. Two authors independently screened the studies found in the searches. Any differences of opinion regarding the selection of studies were settled by a third author.

Results: Twenty-five RCTs, published between 2013 and 2022, providing data from 1261 patients (20 RCTs) with CLBP and 261 patients (five RCTs) with CNP, were included. In reducing pain intensity for patients with CLBP, meta-analyses showed that VRBT is effective in reducing pain just to the end of the intervention, and this effect could be maintained 1 and 6 months after the therapy.

Conclusion: VRBT was found to be better than therapeutic exercise (TE), sham, and no intervention (NI), showing a major effect when VRBT was used as a complementary therapy to conventional physiotherapy (CPT). Further, VRBT showed an immediate effect and immersive VRBT was the most adequate VRBT modality in reducing pain in CNP patients. No differences were found between non-immersive VRBT and immersive VRBT in reducing pain, kinesiophobia, disability, and hr-QoL in patients with CLBP.

基于虚拟现实技术的慢性腰背痛和颈椎痛治疗:系统综述与荟萃分析。
目的:汇编迄今为止所有可用的科学证据,以评估虚拟现实疗法(VRBT)对减轻慢性颈痛(CNP)或慢性腰痛(CLBP)患者的疼痛强度、运动恐惧和相关残疾以及提高其生活质量的影响:方法:检索截至 2023 年 6 月在 PubMed Medline、SCOPUS、Web of Science、CINAHL Complete 和物理治疗证据数据库 (PEDro) 上发表的研究。所有检索均遵循 PICOS 框架。两位作者对检索中发现的研究进行了独立筛选。关于研究选择的任何意见分歧均由第三位作者解决:共纳入了 25 项研究,这些研究发表于 2013 年至 2022 年之间,提供了 1261 名 CLBP 患者(20 项研究)和 261 名 CNP 患者(5 项研究)的数据。荟萃分析表明,在降低CLBP患者的疼痛强度方面,VRBT能在干预结束时有效减轻疼痛,而且这种效果能在治疗1个月和6个月后保持:结论:研究发现,VRBT 的效果优于治疗性运动(TE)、假干预和无干预(NI),显示出 VRBT 作为传统物理治疗(CPT)的辅助疗法具有显著效果。此外,VRBT 显示出了立竿见影的效果,而沉浸式 VRBT 是最能减轻 CNP 患者疼痛的 VRBT 模式。非沉浸式 VRBT 和沉浸式 VRBT 在减轻慢性阻塞性肺病患者的疼痛、运动恐惧、残疾和生活质量方面没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Efort Open Reviews
Efort Open Reviews Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: EFORT Open Reviews publishes high-quality instructional review articles across the whole field of orthopaedics and traumatology. Commissioned, peer-reviewed articles from international experts summarize current knowledge and practice in orthopaedics, with the aim of providing systematic coverage of the field. All articles undergo rigorous scientific editing to ensure the highest standards of accuracy and clarity. This continuously published online journal is fully open access and will provide integrated CME. It is an authoritative resource for educating trainees and supports practising orthopaedic surgeons in keeping informed about the latest clinical and scientific advances. One print issue containing a selection of papers from the journal will be published each year to coincide with the EFORT Annual Congress. EFORT Open Reviews is the official journal of the European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT) and is published in partnership with The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信