Improved Outcomes When Home-Dose Carbidopa-Levodopa Is Continued in the Geriatric Emergency Department in Patients With Parkinson's Disease.

Q2 Medicine
Jaylan M Yuksel, Kelly R Ulen, Jay M Brenner, Sharon A Brangman, John Noviasky
{"title":"Improved Outcomes When Home-Dose Carbidopa-Levodopa Is Continued in the Geriatric Emergency Department in Patients With Parkinson's Disease.","authors":"Jaylan M Yuksel, Kelly R Ulen, Jay M Brenner, Sharon A Brangman, John Noviasky","doi":"10.4140/TCP.n.2024.242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Parkinson's disease (PD) is a debilitating condition that affects 1.8% of people 65 years of age and older. Patients with PD often require hospitalization and are frequently admitted through the emergency department (ED). Notably, their hospital durations tend to be lengthier compared with patients without PD. The primary outcome of this research was to compare the length of stay (LOS) of patients who received carbidopa-levodopa (CL) in the ED with those who did not. Secondary outcomes included 30-day-readmission rates and administration of injectable for agitation. In addition, the percentage of patients receiving CL before and after an information management technology (IMT) alert implementation was compared in a sub-analysis. Patients that received CL during their inpatient stay were identified by a database report in this retrospective study. Patients were excluded if they were not admitted through the ED, younger than 65 years of age, or admitted to the intensive care unit after the ED. There was a total of 266 in the control group and 217 patients in the intervention group. The intervention group had a significantly shorter LOS than the control group (3.29 vs 5.37 days; <i>P</i> = 0.002), significantly less frequent 30-day readmissions (<i>P</i> = 0.032), and used fewer injectables for agitation (<i>P</i> = 0.035). The sub-analysis of the IMT alert revealed that prior to the alert's implementation, 28.5% of patients received CL in the ED; whereas post-alert, this percentage increased to 91.4% (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The results of this study found that the group of PD patients who received CL in the ED had shorter LOS, lower 30-day readmissions, and used less injectables for agitation compared with the group that did not receive CL in the ED. This improvement is possibly due to continuity of CL supply considering its short half-life and clinical importance for PD.</p>","PeriodicalId":41635,"journal":{"name":"Senior Care Pharmacist","volume":"39 7","pages":"242-248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Senior Care Pharmacist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4140/TCP.n.2024.242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a debilitating condition that affects 1.8% of people 65 years of age and older. Patients with PD often require hospitalization and are frequently admitted through the emergency department (ED). Notably, their hospital durations tend to be lengthier compared with patients without PD. The primary outcome of this research was to compare the length of stay (LOS) of patients who received carbidopa-levodopa (CL) in the ED with those who did not. Secondary outcomes included 30-day-readmission rates and administration of injectable for agitation. In addition, the percentage of patients receiving CL before and after an information management technology (IMT) alert implementation was compared in a sub-analysis. Patients that received CL during their inpatient stay were identified by a database report in this retrospective study. Patients were excluded if they were not admitted through the ED, younger than 65 years of age, or admitted to the intensive care unit after the ED. There was a total of 266 in the control group and 217 patients in the intervention group. The intervention group had a significantly shorter LOS than the control group (3.29 vs 5.37 days; P = 0.002), significantly less frequent 30-day readmissions (P = 0.032), and used fewer injectables for agitation (P = 0.035). The sub-analysis of the IMT alert revealed that prior to the alert's implementation, 28.5% of patients received CL in the ED; whereas post-alert, this percentage increased to 91.4% (P < 0.001). The results of this study found that the group of PD patients who received CL in the ED had shorter LOS, lower 30-day readmissions, and used less injectables for agitation compared with the group that did not receive CL in the ED. This improvement is possibly due to continuity of CL supply considering its short half-life and clinical importance for PD.

帕金森病患者在老年急诊科继续服用家庭剂量卡比多巴-左旋多巴可改善疗效。
帕金森病(Parkinson's disease,PD)是一种使人衰弱的疾病,1.8% 的 65 岁及以上老年人都会患上这种疾病。帕金森病患者通常需要住院治疗,并经常通过急诊科(ED)入院。值得注意的是,与非帕金森病患者相比,他们的住院时间往往更长。本研究的主要结果是比较在急诊科接受卡比多巴-左旋多巴(CL)治疗的患者与未接受治疗的患者的住院时间(LOS)。次要研究结果包括 30 天再入院率和治疗躁动的注射剂用量。此外,在一项子分析中还比较了在信息管理技术(IMT)警报实施前后接受卡比多巴-左旋多巴治疗的患者比例。在这项回顾性研究中,通过数据库报告确定了在住院期间接受过CL治疗的患者。如果患者不是通过急诊室入院、年龄小于 65 岁或在急诊室之后入住重症监护室,则将其排除在外。对照组共有 266 名患者,干预组共有 217 名患者。干预组患者的住院时间明显短于对照组(3.29 天 vs 5.37 天;P = 0.002),30 天再入院次数明显少于对照组(P = 0.032),因躁动而使用注射剂的次数也明显少于对照组(P = 0.035)。对 IMT 警报的子分析表明,在实施警报之前,28.5% 的患者在急诊室接受了 CL 治疗;而在实施警报之后,这一比例上升到了 91.4%(P < 0.001)。研究结果发现,与未在急诊室接受治疗的患者相比,在急诊室接受治疗的帕金森病患者的住院时间更短、30 天再入院率更低、因躁动而使用的注射剂更少。考虑到氯化钙的半衰期短,且对帕金森病具有重要的临床意义,这种改善可能是由于氯化钙供应的连续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Senior Care Pharmacist
Senior Care Pharmacist PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信