Patients presenting with musculoskeletal disorders in the emergency department: A qualitative study of their experiences when cared by advanced practice physiotherapists in the province of Québec.

IF 1.5 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Juliette Blondin, François Desmeules, Eveline Matifat, Amélie Kechichian
{"title":"Patients presenting with musculoskeletal disorders in the emergency department: A qualitative study of their experiences when cared by advanced practice physiotherapists in the province of Québec.","authors":"Juliette Blondin, François Desmeules, Eveline Matifat, Amélie Kechichian","doi":"10.1002/msc.1914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advanced practice physiotherapy (APP) models of care are promising to alleviate pressure in emergency departments (EDs) where physiotherapists' new roles include being a first-contact practitioner and leading the overall care and management of patients with minor musculoskeletal disorders (MSKDs) to alleviate ED physicians' caseload.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore patients' acceptability, experience, satisfaction, and perception of a new APP-led model of care in the ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients presenting to the ED with a minor MSKD and who agreed to participate in a multicenter, pan-Canadian randomized controlled trial assessing the efficacy and costs of an APP model of care were invited to participate in this qualitative study. Semi-structured interviews were performed to identify themes related to their experiences with this model. Verbatim transcripts were coded and analysed using an inductive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>11 patients participated and three themes were identified: 1- They were satisfied with the care received within the model; 2- They found APPs to have the appropriate skill set to manage MSKDs and to assume medical-delegated tasks; 3- Timely access to care was a key factor in the acceptability of this model and participants believed physiotherapists were appropriate first-contact practitioners. One participant proposed that the APP model of care should also offer follow-up care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants had a positive experience of care in this new model. These results support the implementation of APP models of care in EDs as the participants appear receptive to new roles for APPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":46945,"journal":{"name":"Musculoskeletal Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musculoskeletal Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.1914","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Advanced practice physiotherapy (APP) models of care are promising to alleviate pressure in emergency departments (EDs) where physiotherapists' new roles include being a first-contact practitioner and leading the overall care and management of patients with minor musculoskeletal disorders (MSKDs) to alleviate ED physicians' caseload.

Purpose: To explore patients' acceptability, experience, satisfaction, and perception of a new APP-led model of care in the ED.

Methods: Patients presenting to the ED with a minor MSKD and who agreed to participate in a multicenter, pan-Canadian randomized controlled trial assessing the efficacy and costs of an APP model of care were invited to participate in this qualitative study. Semi-structured interviews were performed to identify themes related to their experiences with this model. Verbatim transcripts were coded and analysed using an inductive thematic analysis.

Results: 11 patients participated and three themes were identified: 1- They were satisfied with the care received within the model; 2- They found APPs to have the appropriate skill set to manage MSKDs and to assume medical-delegated tasks; 3- Timely access to care was a key factor in the acceptability of this model and participants believed physiotherapists were appropriate first-contact practitioners. One participant proposed that the APP model of care should also offer follow-up care.

Conclusion: Participants had a positive experience of care in this new model. These results support the implementation of APP models of care in EDs as the participants appear receptive to new roles for APPs.

急诊科肌肉骨骼疾病患者:魁北克省高级物理治疗师对患者护理经验的定性研究。
背景:高级物理治疗(APP)护理模式有望缓解急诊科(ED)的压力,物理治疗师在急诊科的新角色包括作为第一接触医师和领导轻微肌肉骨骼疾病(MSKD)患者的整体护理和管理,以减轻急诊科医生的工作量。目的:探讨患者对急诊科以APP为主导的新护理模式的接受度、体验、满意度和感知:方法:邀请因轻微 MSKD 到急诊科就诊并同意参与一项多中心、泛加拿大随机对照试验(评估 APP 护理模式的疗效和成本)的患者参与这项定性研究。研究人员进行了半结构化访谈,以确定与他们使用这种模式的经验有关的主题。采用归纳式主题分析法对逐字记录进行编码和分析:11 名患者参与了访谈,并确定了三个主题:1- 他们对在该模式下获得的护理感到满意;2- 他们发现 APP 具有管理 MSKD 和承担医疗授权任务的适当技能;3- 及时获得护理是该模式可接受性的关键因素,参与者认为物理治疗师是适当的第一联系人。一名参与者建议 APP 护理模式还应提供后续护理:结论:参与者对这种新模式的护理体验良好。这些结果支持在急诊室实施 APP 护理模式,因为参与者似乎乐于接受 APP 的新角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Musculoskeletal Care
Musculoskeletal Care RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Care is a peer-reviewed journal for all health professionals committed to the clinical delivery of high quality care for people with musculoskeletal conditions and providing knowledge to support decision making by professionals, patients and policy makers. This journal publishes papers on original research, applied research, review articles and clinical guidelines. Regular topics include patient education, psychological and social impact, patient experiences of health care, clinical up dates and the effectiveness of therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信