Thoracic canal morphology on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in spinal cord stimulation patients.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain Practice Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-29 DOI:10.1111/papr.13398
Kevin Hines, Christian Tran, Anusha Koka, Nikolaos Mouchtouris, Karim Hafazalla, Ellina Hattar, Chengyuan Wu, Ashwini Sharan
{"title":"Thoracic canal morphology on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in spinal cord stimulation patients.","authors":"Kevin Hines, Christian Tran, Anusha Koka, Nikolaos Mouchtouris, Karim Hafazalla, Ellina Hattar, Chengyuan Wu, Ashwini Sharan","doi":"10.1111/papr.13398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In high-frequency spinal cord stimulation anatomic placement targeting of the T9-10 disc space is based on \"empiric\" results that are best replicated with coverage broadly from T8 to T10. This study contains the largest cohort of patients evaluating low thoracic morphology and seeks to address the lack of MRI morphological analysis in literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a retrospective review of a database of 101 consecutive patients undergoing permanent implant of thoracic SCS for chronic pain. Measurements were carried out on preoperative MRI imaging. Anteroposterior (AP) and lateral dimensions of the spinal cord as well as dural sac were measured. In addition, dorsal cerebrospinal fluid thickness and paddle depression distance were also measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When comparing morphological dimensions by level, dorsal CSF thickness was smaller at T9-10 than T7-8 (p = 0.018). In addition, lateral dural and spinal cord diameters were larger at T10-11 than T9-10, contributing to larger dural surface area at T10-11 (p = 0.028). While trends of dorsal CSF thickness tend to decrease with lower thoracic levels, the ratio of surface area of spinal cord to dural sac appeared to remain relatively constant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dorsal CSF thickness is smaller at T9-10 than T7-8 in chronic pain patients in this cohort. More ellipsoid, cord, and spinal canal diameter measurements were noted at lower levels of the thoracic spinal cord, particularly at T10-11. This may correlate with anatomical SCS placement. Future studies should evaluate efficacy of SCS therapy for pain based on these anatomical considerations.</p>","PeriodicalId":19974,"journal":{"name":"Pain Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1035-1041"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.13398","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In high-frequency spinal cord stimulation anatomic placement targeting of the T9-10 disc space is based on "empiric" results that are best replicated with coverage broadly from T8 to T10. This study contains the largest cohort of patients evaluating low thoracic morphology and seeks to address the lack of MRI morphological analysis in literature.

Methods: This study was a retrospective review of a database of 101 consecutive patients undergoing permanent implant of thoracic SCS for chronic pain. Measurements were carried out on preoperative MRI imaging. Anteroposterior (AP) and lateral dimensions of the spinal cord as well as dural sac were measured. In addition, dorsal cerebrospinal fluid thickness and paddle depression distance were also measured.

Results: When comparing morphological dimensions by level, dorsal CSF thickness was smaller at T9-10 than T7-8 (p = 0.018). In addition, lateral dural and spinal cord diameters were larger at T10-11 than T9-10, contributing to larger dural surface area at T10-11 (p = 0.028). While trends of dorsal CSF thickness tend to decrease with lower thoracic levels, the ratio of surface area of spinal cord to dural sac appeared to remain relatively constant.

Conclusions: Dorsal CSF thickness is smaller at T9-10 than T7-8 in chronic pain patients in this cohort. More ellipsoid, cord, and spinal canal diameter measurements were noted at lower levels of the thoracic spinal cord, particularly at T10-11. This may correlate with anatomical SCS placement. Future studies should evaluate efficacy of SCS therapy for pain based on these anatomical considerations.

脊髓刺激术患者术前磁共振成像显示的胸椎管形态。
导言:在高频脊髓刺激术中,以T9-10椎间盘间隙为目标的解剖位置是基于 "经验 "结果,最好是在T8至T10的广泛覆盖范围内进行复制。本研究包含了评估低位胸椎形态学的最大规模患者群,旨在解决文献中缺乏 MRI 形态学分析的问题:本研究是对 101 名因慢性疼痛而接受胸椎 SCS 永久植入手术的连续患者的数据库进行的回顾性审查。对术前核磁共振成像进行了测量。测量了脊髓和硬膜囊的前胸(AP)和侧方尺寸。此外,还测量了背侧脑脊液厚度和桨状凹陷距离:结果:在比较各级形态学尺寸时,T9-10脊髓背侧脑脊液厚度小于T7-8(P = 0.018)。此外,T10-11的硬脊膜外侧和脊髓直径大于T9-10,从而导致T10-11的硬脊膜表面积更大(p = 0.028)。虽然 CSF 背侧厚度随着胸椎级别的降低而呈下降趋势,但脊髓与硬膜囊的表面积之比似乎保持相对稳定:结论:本组慢性疼痛患者的 T9-10 背侧 CSF 厚度小于 T7-8。在胸椎脊髓的较低位置,尤其是在 T10-11 位置,椭圆体、脊髓和椎管直径的测量值更多。这可能与解剖学上的 SCS 安放有关。未来的研究应根据这些解剖学因素评估 SCS 治疗疼痛的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Practice
Pain Practice ANESTHESIOLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
92
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain Practice, the official journal of the World Institute of Pain, publishes international multidisciplinary articles on pain and analgesia that provide its readership with up-to-date research, evaluation methods, and techniques for pain management. Special sections including the Consultant’s Corner, Images in Pain Practice, Case Studies from Mayo, Tutorials, and the Evidence-Based Medicine combine to give pain researchers, pain clinicians and pain fellows in training a systematic approach to continuing education in pain medicine. Prior to publication, all articles and reviews undergo peer review by at least two experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信