Recover of Soil Microbial Community Functions in Beech and Turkey Oak Forests After Coppicing Interventions.

IF 3.3 3区 生物学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Enrica Picariello, Flavia De Nicola
{"title":"Recover of Soil Microbial Community Functions in Beech and Turkey Oak Forests After Coppicing Interventions.","authors":"Enrica Picariello, Flavia De Nicola","doi":"10.1007/s00248-024-02402-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Forest management influences the occurrence of tree species, the organic matter input to the soil decomposer system, and hence, it can alter soil microbial community and key ecosystem functions it performs. In this study, we compared the potential effect of different forest management, coppice and high forest, on soil microbial functional diversity, enzyme activities and chemical-physical soil properties in two forests, turkey oak and beech, during summer and autumn. We hypothesized that coppicing influences soil microbial functional diversity with an overall decrease. Contrary to our hypothesis, in summer, the functional diversity of soil microbial community was higher in both coppice forests, suggesting a resilience response of the microbial communities in the soil after tree cutting, which occurred 15-20 years ago. In beech forest under coppice management, a higher content of soil organic matter (but also of soil recalcitrant and stable organic carbon) compared to high forest can explain the higher soil microbial functional diversity and metabolic activity. In turkey oak forest, although differences in functional diversity of soil microbial community between management were observed, for the other investigated parameters, the differences were mainly linked to seasonality. The findings highlight that the soil organic matter preservation depends on the type of forest, but the soil microbial community was able to recover after about 15 years from coppice intervention in both forest ecosystems. Thus, the type of management implemented in these forest ecosystems, not negatively affecting soil organic matter pool, preserving microbial community and potentially soil ecological functions, is sustainable in a scenario of climate change.</p>","PeriodicalId":18708,"journal":{"name":"Microbial Ecology","volume":"87 1","pages":"86"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11213729/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbial Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-024-02402-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forest management influences the occurrence of tree species, the organic matter input to the soil decomposer system, and hence, it can alter soil microbial community and key ecosystem functions it performs. In this study, we compared the potential effect of different forest management, coppice and high forest, on soil microbial functional diversity, enzyme activities and chemical-physical soil properties in two forests, turkey oak and beech, during summer and autumn. We hypothesized that coppicing influences soil microbial functional diversity with an overall decrease. Contrary to our hypothesis, in summer, the functional diversity of soil microbial community was higher in both coppice forests, suggesting a resilience response of the microbial communities in the soil after tree cutting, which occurred 15-20 years ago. In beech forest under coppice management, a higher content of soil organic matter (but also of soil recalcitrant and stable organic carbon) compared to high forest can explain the higher soil microbial functional diversity and metabolic activity. In turkey oak forest, although differences in functional diversity of soil microbial community between management were observed, for the other investigated parameters, the differences were mainly linked to seasonality. The findings highlight that the soil organic matter preservation depends on the type of forest, but the soil microbial community was able to recover after about 15 years from coppice intervention in both forest ecosystems. Thus, the type of management implemented in these forest ecosystems, not negatively affecting soil organic matter pool, preserving microbial community and potentially soil ecological functions, is sustainable in a scenario of climate change.

Abstract Image

山毛榉和火鸡栎森林砍伐干预后土壤微生物群落功能的恢复。
森林管理会影响树种的出现、土壤分解者系统的有机物输入,从而改变土壤微生物群落及其发挥的关键生态系统功能。在这项研究中,我们比较了不同的森林管理方式(矮林和高林)在夏季和秋季对火栎和山毛榉两种森林的土壤微生物功能多样性、酶活性和土壤化学物理特性的潜在影响。我们假设,矮林会影响土壤微生物的功能多样性,使其整体减少。与我们的假设相反,在夏季,两片矮林中土壤微生物群落的功能多样性都较高,这表明土壤中的微生物群落在 15-20 年前砍伐树木后具有恢复能力。在山毛榉林中,与高大森林相比,实行矮林管理的山毛榉林土壤有机质含量更高(但土壤中的难分解有机碳和稳定有机碳含量也更高),这可以解释为什么土壤微生物功能多样性和代谢活性更高。在火鸡栎林中,虽然不同管理方式下土壤微生物群落的功能多样性存在差异,但在其他调查参数方面,差异主要与季节性有关。研究结果表明,土壤有机质的保存取决于森林类型,但两种森林生态系统中的土壤微生物群落都能在矮林干预约 15 年后恢复。因此,在这些森林生态系统中实施的管理类型不会对土壤有机质库产生负面影响,还能保护微生物群落和潜在的土壤生态功能,在气候变化的情况下是可持续的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microbial Ecology
Microbial Ecology 生物-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
212
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Microbial Ecology was founded more than 50 years ago by Dr. Ralph Mitchell, Gordon McKay Professor of Applied Biology at Harvard University in Cambridge, MA. The journal has evolved to become a premier location for the presentation of manuscripts that represent advances in the field of microbial ecology. The journal has become a dedicated international forum for the presentation of high-quality scientific investigations of how microorganisms interact with their environment, with each other and with their hosts. Microbial Ecology offers articles of original research in full paper and note formats, as well as brief reviews and topical position papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信