Overwrapping Bivalved Casts: Does the Material Matter?

IF 1.4 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-28 DOI:10.1097/BPO.0000000000002751
Alexa J Karkenny, Allyn Morris, Cameron Smith, Jorden Xavier, Zeynep Seref-Ferlengez, Leila Mehraban Alvandi, I Martin Levy
{"title":"Overwrapping Bivalved Casts: Does the Material Matter?","authors":"Alexa J Karkenny, Allyn Morris, Cameron Smith, Jorden Xavier, Zeynep Seref-Ferlengez, Leila Mehraban Alvandi, I Martin Levy","doi":"10.1097/BPO.0000000000002751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Circumferential integrity of bivalved casts (cut twice longitudinally) can be restored by overwrapping with different materials. This study compared the mechanical properties of solid casts and bivalved casts overwrapped with semirigid fiberglass (SF), elastic bandages (EB), and rigid fiberglass (RF) using an overwrapped-bivalved cast-bone fracture (OBCBF) model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used an MTS Bionix Servohydraulic system to test properties of OBCBF models in 4 conditions: intact Control made of RF (not bivalved or overwrapped), a Rigid overwrapped model made of a Control bivalved and overwrapped with RF, a Semirigid overwrapped model made of a Control bivalved and overwrapped with SF, and an Elastic model made of a Control bivalved and overwrapped with EB. Constructs were tested in 4-point bending. Force-displacement curves (FDC) were generated to calculate load-at-critical-failure (LCF, angulation > 10 degrees = 6.6 mm vertical deformation) and stiffness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five controls and 30 OBCBF models with 3 overwrapped cast types were tested, with each overwrapped cast type tested with 2 orientations of the initial cast bivalve axis, yielding 7 conditions (Control, Rigid 0 degrees, Rigid 90 degrees, Semirigid 0 degrees, Semirigid 90 degrees, Elastic 0 degrees, Elastic 90 degrees). Mean LCF was: Rigid 90 degrees > Rigid 0 degrees > Control > Semirigid 0 degrees > Semirigid 90 degrees > Elastic 90 degrees > Elastic 0 degrees ( P <0.0001). Mean stiffness was: Rigid 0 degrees > Rigid 90 degrees > Control > Semirigid 90 degrees > Semirigid 0 degrees > Elastic 0 degrees > Elastic 90 degrees ( P <0.0001). Multiple comparisons indicated no significant difference between LCF and stiffness for Semirigid 0 degrees/90 degrees casts compared with Controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mechanical properties of overwrapped bivalved casts change depending on the materials used to overwrap, with higher LCF and stiffness when overwrapping with RF > SF > EB; however, mean comparisons indicate that rigid bivalved casts overwrapped with SF did not have significantly different mean stiffness and LCF from controls and other cast models.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>This study compares the bending properties of a bivalved cast-construct overwrapped with different materials, providing basic science evidence for orthopaedic surgeons who have several choices of materials to overwrap bivalved casts.</p>","PeriodicalId":16945,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000002751","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Circumferential integrity of bivalved casts (cut twice longitudinally) can be restored by overwrapping with different materials. This study compared the mechanical properties of solid casts and bivalved casts overwrapped with semirigid fiberglass (SF), elastic bandages (EB), and rigid fiberglass (RF) using an overwrapped-bivalved cast-bone fracture (OBCBF) model.

Methods: This study used an MTS Bionix Servohydraulic system to test properties of OBCBF models in 4 conditions: intact Control made of RF (not bivalved or overwrapped), a Rigid overwrapped model made of a Control bivalved and overwrapped with RF, a Semirigid overwrapped model made of a Control bivalved and overwrapped with SF, and an Elastic model made of a Control bivalved and overwrapped with EB. Constructs were tested in 4-point bending. Force-displacement curves (FDC) were generated to calculate load-at-critical-failure (LCF, angulation > 10 degrees = 6.6 mm vertical deformation) and stiffness.

Results: Five controls and 30 OBCBF models with 3 overwrapped cast types were tested, with each overwrapped cast type tested with 2 orientations of the initial cast bivalve axis, yielding 7 conditions (Control, Rigid 0 degrees, Rigid 90 degrees, Semirigid 0 degrees, Semirigid 90 degrees, Elastic 0 degrees, Elastic 90 degrees). Mean LCF was: Rigid 90 degrees > Rigid 0 degrees > Control > Semirigid 0 degrees > Semirigid 90 degrees > Elastic 90 degrees > Elastic 0 degrees ( P <0.0001). Mean stiffness was: Rigid 0 degrees > Rigid 90 degrees > Control > Semirigid 90 degrees > Semirigid 0 degrees > Elastic 0 degrees > Elastic 90 degrees ( P <0.0001). Multiple comparisons indicated no significant difference between LCF and stiffness for Semirigid 0 degrees/90 degrees casts compared with Controls.

Conclusions: Mechanical properties of overwrapped bivalved casts change depending on the materials used to overwrap, with higher LCF and stiffness when overwrapping with RF > SF > EB; however, mean comparisons indicate that rigid bivalved casts overwrapped with SF did not have significantly different mean stiffness and LCF from controls and other cast models.

Clinical relevance: This study compares the bending properties of a bivalved cast-construct overwrapped with different materials, providing basic science evidence for orthopaedic surgeons who have several choices of materials to overwrap bivalved casts.

双壳铸件的外包装:材料重要吗?
背景:双瓣铸型(纵向切两刀)的周缘完整性可通过使用不同材料进行包扎来恢复。本研究使用外包裹双瓣铸型骨骨折(OBCBF)模型,比较了实心铸型和外包裹半刚性玻璃纤维(SF)、弹性绷带(EB)和刚性玻璃纤维(RF)的双瓣铸型的机械性能:本研究使用 MTS Bionix 伺服液压系统测试了 OBCBF 模型在 4 种条件下的特性:RF 制成的完整对照组(未双瓣或包扎)、由双瓣对照组和 RF 包扎制成的刚性包扎模型、由双瓣对照组和 SF 包扎制成的半刚性包扎模型,以及由双瓣对照组和 EB 包扎制成的弹性模型。对构建物进行了四点弯曲测试。生成力-位移曲线(FDC)以计算临界失效载荷(LCF,角度 > 10 度 = 6.6 毫米垂直变形)和刚度:对 5 个对照组和 30 个 OBCBF 模型的 3 种外包铸件类型进行了测试,每种外包铸件类型都对初始铸件双壳轴的 2 个方向进行了测试,得出了 7 种条件(对照组、刚性 0 度、刚性 90 度、半刚性 0 度、半刚性 90 度、弹性 0 度、弹性 90 度)。平均 LCF 为刚性 90 度 > 刚性 0 度 > 对照组 > 半刚性 0 度 > 半刚性 90 度 > 弹性 90 度 > 弹性 0 度(P 刚性 90 度 > 对照组 > 半刚性 90 度 > 半刚性 0 度 > 弹性 0 度 > 弹性 90 度(PC结论:包覆双瓣铸型的机械性能会因包覆材料的不同而发生变化,当使用 RF > SF > EB 包覆时,LCF 和刚度较高;然而,平均值比较表明,使用 SF 包覆的刚性双瓣铸型的平均刚度和 LCF 与对照组和其他铸型没有显著差异:这项研究比较了使用不同材料包覆的双瓣石膏结构的弯曲特性,为骨科医生提供了基础科学证据,因为骨科医生在包覆双瓣石膏时有多种材料可供选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
17.60%
发文量
512
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: ​Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics is a leading journal that focuses specifically on traumatic injuries to give you hands-on on coverage of a fast-growing field. You''ll get articles that cover everything from the nature of injury to the effects of new drug therapies; everything from recommendations for more effective surgical approaches to the latest laboratory findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信