How to demonstrate factors associated with peri-esophageal vagal nerve injury during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

IF 2.2 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Naoya Kataoka MD, Teruhiko Imamura MD
{"title":"How to demonstrate factors associated with peri-esophageal vagal nerve injury during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation","authors":"Naoya Kataoka MD,&nbsp;Teruhiko Imamura MD","doi":"10.1002/joa3.13048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Peri-esophageal vagal nerve injury (PNI) can unpredictably occur during atrial fibrillation ablation procedures. Yoshimura and colleagues have demonstrated an association between symptomatic PNI and high contact force near the esophagus.<span><sup>1</sup></span> However, several concerns have been raised.</p><p>While the authors identify contact force as a major cause of PNI,<span><sup>1</sup></span> other factors such as baseline impedance and the rate of rise of esophageal temperature during ablation have also been proposed.<span><sup>2, 3</sup></span></p><p>The authors limited ablation power to &lt;30 W and ablation duration to within 30 s, irrespective of the ablation index, when ablating the left atrial posterior wall near the esophagus.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Ablation was terminated promptly if the esophageal temperature reached 40°C. Nevertheless, recent literature indicates that high-power short-duration ablation may offer advantages over moderate-power moderate-duration ablation, including improved durability of ablation, reduced procedure time, and decreased risk of irreversible tissue injury.<span><sup>4</sup></span> Additionally, concerns persist regarding the optimal placement of ablation lines on the left atrial posterior wall to prevent PNI.</p><p>In the current era, moderate-power ablation, as employed by the authors, is seldom the initial choice. Instead, cryoballoon and pulsed-field ablations are preferred. How do the authors' findings translate to contemporary procedures?</p><p>None.</p><p>Authors declare no conflict of interests for this article.</p><p>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":15174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arrhythmia","volume":"40 3","pages":"652"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11199827/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arrhythmia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joa3.13048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Peri-esophageal vagal nerve injury (PNI) can unpredictably occur during atrial fibrillation ablation procedures. Yoshimura and colleagues have demonstrated an association between symptomatic PNI and high contact force near the esophagus.1 However, several concerns have been raised.

While the authors identify contact force as a major cause of PNI,1 other factors such as baseline impedance and the rate of rise of esophageal temperature during ablation have also been proposed.2, 3

The authors limited ablation power to <30 W and ablation duration to within 30 s, irrespective of the ablation index, when ablating the left atrial posterior wall near the esophagus.1 Ablation was terminated promptly if the esophageal temperature reached 40°C. Nevertheless, recent literature indicates that high-power short-duration ablation may offer advantages over moderate-power moderate-duration ablation, including improved durability of ablation, reduced procedure time, and decreased risk of irreversible tissue injury.4 Additionally, concerns persist regarding the optimal placement of ablation lines on the left atrial posterior wall to prevent PNI.

In the current era, moderate-power ablation, as employed by the authors, is seldom the initial choice. Instead, cryoballoon and pulsed-field ablations are preferred. How do the authors' findings translate to contemporary procedures?

None.

Authors declare no conflict of interests for this article.

None.

如何证明心房颤动导管消融术中食管周围迷走神经损伤的相关因素。
在心房颤动消融术中,食管周围迷走神经损伤(PNI)可能会不可预测地发生。Yoshimura 及其同事证明了无症状的 PNI 与食管附近的高接触力之间存在关联。1 然而,也有人提出了一些担忧。虽然作者认为接触力是 PNI 的主要原因,1 但也有人提出了其他因素,如基线阻抗和消融过程中食管温度的上升速度、3 作者在消融食管附近的左心房后壁时,将消融功率限制在 30 W,消融持续时间限制在 30 秒以内,而不考虑消融指数。然而,最近的文献表明,高功率短时间消融可能比中等功率中等时间消融更有优势,包括提高消融的持久性、缩短手术时间、降低组织不可逆损伤的风险4 。在当今时代,作者采用的中等功率消融术很少作为初始选择,而是首选冷冻气球和脉冲场消融术。作者的研究结果如何转化为当代的手术方法?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Arrhythmia
Journal of Arrhythmia CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
127
审稿时长
45 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信