Residents' Knowledge regarding Recreational Drug Screening Immunoassays at a Swiss Hospital Group.

IF 1.5 4区 化学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
International Journal of Analytical Chemistry Pub Date : 2024-06-10 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/4400606
Elias Bekka, Samuel E Christen, Laura Hermann, Aristomenis K Exadaktylos, Manuel Haschke, Evangelia Liakoni
{"title":"Residents' Knowledge regarding Recreational Drug Screening Immunoassays at a Swiss Hospital Group.","authors":"Elias Bekka, Samuel E Christen, Laura Hermann, Aristomenis K Exadaktylos, Manuel Haschke, Evangelia Liakoni","doi":"10.1155/2024/4400606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In case of suspected acute recreational drug toxicity, immunoassays are commonly used as diagnostic tools. Although easy to handle, understanding of their limitations is necessary for a correct interpretation of the results. The aim of this project was to investigate residents' knowledge regarding drug screening immunoassays at a Swiss hospital group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All residents of a large hospital group in Switzerland were invited by e-mail to participate in an anonymous survey. Following ten multiple choice questions on drug screening tests, the participants were also asked about their demographics, whether they used drug screening tests on a regular basis, and how confident they felt in their ability to interpret test results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ten knowledge questions were answered by 110 of the 1026 residents (11%). Among the 108 participants with available demographics, 90% were 25-35 years old, 63% were female, and 70% were at least in their 4<sup>th</sup> year of residency. The median score of correct answers was 4 out of 10 (range 0-7) and in 50% of the questions, the correct answer was the most frequently selected response. No significant differences in the knowledge scores were found based on the training, confidence level, or the frequency of drug tests used in daily work.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This survey revealed widespread knowledge gaps among residents regarding the interpretation of immunoassay-based drug test results. These findings can be used to implement educational measures on this topic and might provide a basis for targeted information on common pitfalls to be included in laboratory reports.</p>","PeriodicalId":13888,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Analytical Chemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11208805/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/4400606","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In case of suspected acute recreational drug toxicity, immunoassays are commonly used as diagnostic tools. Although easy to handle, understanding of their limitations is necessary for a correct interpretation of the results. The aim of this project was to investigate residents' knowledge regarding drug screening immunoassays at a Swiss hospital group.

Methods: All residents of a large hospital group in Switzerland were invited by e-mail to participate in an anonymous survey. Following ten multiple choice questions on drug screening tests, the participants were also asked about their demographics, whether they used drug screening tests on a regular basis, and how confident they felt in their ability to interpret test results.

Results: The ten knowledge questions were answered by 110 of the 1026 residents (11%). Among the 108 participants with available demographics, 90% were 25-35 years old, 63% were female, and 70% were at least in their 4th year of residency. The median score of correct answers was 4 out of 10 (range 0-7) and in 50% of the questions, the correct answer was the most frequently selected response. No significant differences in the knowledge scores were found based on the training, confidence level, or the frequency of drug tests used in daily work.

Conclusion: This survey revealed widespread knowledge gaps among residents regarding the interpretation of immunoassay-based drug test results. These findings can be used to implement educational measures on this topic and might provide a basis for targeted information on common pitfalls to be included in laboratory reports.

瑞士一家医院集团的住院医师对娱乐性药物筛查免疫测定的了解。
导言:在怀疑急性娱乐性药物中毒的情况下,免疫测定通常被用作诊断工具。虽然免疫测定很容易操作,但要正确解释结果,就必须了解其局限性。本项目旨在调查瑞士一家医院集团的住院医师对药物筛查免疫测定法的了解程度:方法:通过电子邮件邀请瑞士一家大型医院集团的所有住院医师参与匿名调查。在十道有关药物筛查测试的选择题之后,还询问了参与者的人口统计学特征、是否定期使用药物筛查测试,以及他们对自己解读测试结果的能力有多大信心:1026 名居民中有 110 人(11%)回答了 10 个知识问题。在 108 名有人口统计数据的参与者中,90% 年龄在 25-35 岁之间,63% 为女性,70% 至少是住院医师的第四年。正确答案的中位数为 4 分(满分 10 分,0-7 分不等),在 50%的问题中,正确答案是最常选择的答案。根据培训、自信程度或日常工作中使用药物检测的频率,知识得分没有发现明显差异:这项调查揭示了住院医生在解读基于免疫测定的药物检测结果方面普遍存在的知识差距。这些发现可用于实施有关该主题的教育措施,并为在实验室报告中纳入有关常见误区的针对性信息提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
117
期刊介绍: International Journal of Analytical Chemistry publishes original research articles that report new experimental results and methods, especially in relation to important analytes, difficult matrices, and topical samples. Investigations may be fundamental, or else related to specific applications; examples being biological, environmental and food testing, and analysis in chemical synthesis and materials processing. As well as original research, the International Journal of Analytical Chemistry also publishes focused review articles that examine the state of the art, identify emerging trends, and suggest future directions for developing fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信