Patient perceptions of and experiences with stigma using telehealth for opioid use disorder treatment: a qualitative analysis.

IF 4 2区 社会学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Jessica V Couch, Mackenzie Whitcomb, Bradley M Buchheit, David A Dorr, Darren J Malinoski, P Todd Korthuis, Sarah S Ono, Ximena A Levander
{"title":"Patient perceptions of and experiences with stigma using telehealth for opioid use disorder treatment: a qualitative analysis.","authors":"Jessica V Couch, Mackenzie Whitcomb, Bradley M Buchheit, David A Dorr, Darren J Malinoski, P Todd Korthuis, Sarah S Ono, Ximena A Levander","doi":"10.1186/s12954-024-01043-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) experience various forms of stigma at the individual, public, and structural levels that can affect how they access and engage with healthcare, particularly with medications for OUD treatment. Telehealth is a relatively new form of care delivery for OUD treatment. As reducing stigma surrounding OUD treatment is critical to address ongoing gaps in care, the aim of this study was to explore how telehealth impacts patient experiences of stigma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this qualitative study, we interviewed patients with OUD at a single urban academic medical center consisting of multiple primary care and addiction clinics in Oregon, USA. Participants were eligible if they had (1) at least one virtual visit for OUD between March 2020 and December 2021, and (2) a prescription for buprenorphine not exclusively used for chronic pain. We conducted phone interviews between October and December 2022, then recorded, transcribed, dual-coded, and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of participants (n = 30) was 40.5 years (range 20-63); 14 were women, 15 were men, and two were transgender, non-binary, or gender-diverse. Participants were 77% white, and 33% had experienced homelessness in the prior six months. We identified four themes regarding how telehealth for OUD treatment shaped patient perceptions of and experiences with stigma at the individual (1), public (2-3), and structural levels (4): (1) Telehealth offers wanted space and improved control over treatment setting; (2) Public stigma and privacy concerns can impact both telehealth and in-person encounters, depending on clinical and personal circumstances; (3) The social distance of telehealth could mitigate or exacerbate perceptions of clinician stigma, depending on both patient and clinician expectations; (4) The increased flexibility of telehealth translated to perceptions of increased clinician trust and respect.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The forms of stigma experienced by individuals with OUD are complex and multifaceted, as are the ways in which those experiences interact with telehealth-based care. The mixed results of this study support policies allowing for a more individualized, patient-centered approach to care delivery that allows patients a choice over how they receive OUD treatment services.</p>","PeriodicalId":12922,"journal":{"name":"Harm Reduction Journal","volume":"21 1","pages":"125"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11210005/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harm Reduction Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-024-01043-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) experience various forms of stigma at the individual, public, and structural levels that can affect how they access and engage with healthcare, particularly with medications for OUD treatment. Telehealth is a relatively new form of care delivery for OUD treatment. As reducing stigma surrounding OUD treatment is critical to address ongoing gaps in care, the aim of this study was to explore how telehealth impacts patient experiences of stigma.

Methods: In this qualitative study, we interviewed patients with OUD at a single urban academic medical center consisting of multiple primary care and addiction clinics in Oregon, USA. Participants were eligible if they had (1) at least one virtual visit for OUD between March 2020 and December 2021, and (2) a prescription for buprenorphine not exclusively used for chronic pain. We conducted phone interviews between October and December 2022, then recorded, transcribed, dual-coded, and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: The mean age of participants (n = 30) was 40.5 years (range 20-63); 14 were women, 15 were men, and two were transgender, non-binary, or gender-diverse. Participants were 77% white, and 33% had experienced homelessness in the prior six months. We identified four themes regarding how telehealth for OUD treatment shaped patient perceptions of and experiences with stigma at the individual (1), public (2-3), and structural levels (4): (1) Telehealth offers wanted space and improved control over treatment setting; (2) Public stigma and privacy concerns can impact both telehealth and in-person encounters, depending on clinical and personal circumstances; (3) The social distance of telehealth could mitigate or exacerbate perceptions of clinician stigma, depending on both patient and clinician expectations; (4) The increased flexibility of telehealth translated to perceptions of increased clinician trust and respect.

Conclusions: The forms of stigma experienced by individuals with OUD are complex and multifaceted, as are the ways in which those experiences interact with telehealth-based care. The mixed results of this study support policies allowing for a more individualized, patient-centered approach to care delivery that allows patients a choice over how they receive OUD treatment services.

使用远程保健治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的患者对污名化的看法和经历:定性分析。
背景:阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)患者在个人、公众和结构层面都会遭受各种形式的羞辱,这可能会影响他们获得和参与医疗保健的方式,尤其是使用药物治疗 OUD。远程医疗是一种相对较新的 OUD 治疗护理方式。减少围绕 OUD 治疗的污名化对于解决目前存在的医疗差距至关重要,因此本研究旨在探讨远程医疗如何影响患者的污名化体验:在这项定性研究中,我们采访了美国俄勒冈州一个由多个初级保健和成瘾诊所组成的城市学术医疗中心的 OUD 患者。参与者必须符合以下条件:(1)在 2020 年 3 月至 2021 年 12 月期间至少有一次治疗 OUD 的虚拟就诊;(2)持有丁丙诺啡处方,且不完全用于慢性疼痛。我们在 2022 年 10 月至 12 月期间进行了电话访谈,然后进行录音、转录、双重编码,并使用反思性主题分析法进行分析:参与者(n = 30)的平均年龄为 40.5 岁(20-63 岁不等);14 人为女性,15 人为男性,2 人为变性人、非二元性或性别多元化者。77% 的参与者为白人,33% 的参与者在过去六个月内曾无家可归。我们确定了四个主题,分别涉及远程保健治疗 OUD 如何在个人(1)、公众(2-3)和结构(4)层面上影响患者对污名化的看法和经历:(1)远程医疗提供了想要的空间,并改善了对治疗环境的控制;(2)公众对污名和隐私的担忧可能会影响远程医疗和面对面的接触,这取决于临床和个人情况;(3)远程医疗的社会距离可能会减轻或加剧对临床医生的污名感,这取决于患者和临床医生的期望;(4)远程医疗灵活性的增加转化为对临床医生信任和尊重的增加:结论:OUD 患者所经历的污名化形式是复杂和多方面的,这些经历与基于远程医疗的护理之间的相互作用方式也是如此。这项研究的结果有好有坏,但都支持制定相关政策,允许采用更加个性化、以患者为中心的护理方法,让患者可以选择接受 OUD 治疗服务的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Harm Reduction Journal
Harm Reduction Journal Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
126
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Harm Reduction Journal is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal whose focus is on the prevalent patterns of psychoactive drug use, the public policies meant to control them, and the search for effective methods of reducing the adverse medical, public health, and social consequences associated with both drugs and drug policies. We define "harm reduction" as "policies and programs which aim to reduce the health, social, and economic costs of legal and illegal psychoactive drug use without necessarily reducing drug consumption". We are especially interested in studies of the evolving patterns of drug use around the world, their implications for the spread of HIV/AIDS and other blood-borne pathogens.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信