Screening for optimal parameters for modified pharyngeal electrical stimulation for the treatment of dysphagia after stroke in rats

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Jiahui Hu , Qianqian Wang , Yong Dai , Yueqin Tian , Nenggui Xu , Hongmei Wen , Zulin Dou , Qiuping Ye
{"title":"Screening for optimal parameters for modified pharyngeal electrical stimulation for the treatment of dysphagia after stroke in rats","authors":"Jiahui Hu ,&nbsp;Qianqian Wang ,&nbsp;Yong Dai ,&nbsp;Yueqin Tian ,&nbsp;Nenggui Xu ,&nbsp;Hongmei Wen ,&nbsp;Zulin Dou ,&nbsp;Qiuping Ye","doi":"10.1016/j.expneurol.2024.114878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Pharyngeal electrical stimulation (PES), a novel noninvasive peripheral nerve stimulation technique, can effectively improve neurogenic dysphagia and increase the safety and effectiveness of swallowing in the clinic. However, the lack of animal models for dysphagia has limited the mechanistic research on PES, which affects its wide application. Therefore, determining optimal parameters for PES in rats is needed to enable mechanistic studies. Modified PES (mPES), which has different waves and pulse widths from PES, was used; in previous studies mPES was found to have a neurological mechanism like that of PES. A poststroke dysphagia (PSD) model was established, and rats with dysphagia were grouped into three different intensities (0.1 mA, 0.5 mA, and 1 mA) for the selection of optimal intensity and three different frequencies (1 Hz, 2 Hz, and 5 Hz) for the selection of optimal frequency based on a stimulation duration of 10 min in the clinic. A Videofluroscopic Swallow Screen (VFSS) was used to assess swallowing function in rats before and after mPES treatment. The results showed that the 1 mA group had better swallowing function (<em>p &lt; 0.05</em>) than the model group. Compared with the model group, the 1 Hz and 5 Hz groups had the same improvement in swallowing function (<em>p &lt; 0.05</em>). However, the increase in excitatory signals in the sensorimotor cortex was more pronounced in the 5 Hz group than in the other frequency stimulation groups (<em>p &lt; 0.05</em>). Combining the clinical findings with the above results, we concluded that the optimal stimulation parameter for mPES in rats is “frequency: 5 Hz, current intensity: 1 mA for 10 min/day”, which provides a basis for future basic experimental studies of mPES in animals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12246,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014488624002048/pdfft?md5=4647f90a3161928e5cd535077ca292d4&pid=1-s2.0-S0014488624002048-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014488624002048","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pharyngeal electrical stimulation (PES), a novel noninvasive peripheral nerve stimulation technique, can effectively improve neurogenic dysphagia and increase the safety and effectiveness of swallowing in the clinic. However, the lack of animal models for dysphagia has limited the mechanistic research on PES, which affects its wide application. Therefore, determining optimal parameters for PES in rats is needed to enable mechanistic studies. Modified PES (mPES), which has different waves and pulse widths from PES, was used; in previous studies mPES was found to have a neurological mechanism like that of PES. A poststroke dysphagia (PSD) model was established, and rats with dysphagia were grouped into three different intensities (0.1 mA, 0.5 mA, and 1 mA) for the selection of optimal intensity and three different frequencies (1 Hz, 2 Hz, and 5 Hz) for the selection of optimal frequency based on a stimulation duration of 10 min in the clinic. A Videofluroscopic Swallow Screen (VFSS) was used to assess swallowing function in rats before and after mPES treatment. The results showed that the 1 mA group had better swallowing function (p < 0.05) than the model group. Compared with the model group, the 1 Hz and 5 Hz groups had the same improvement in swallowing function (p < 0.05). However, the increase in excitatory signals in the sensorimotor cortex was more pronounced in the 5 Hz group than in the other frequency stimulation groups (p < 0.05). Combining the clinical findings with the above results, we concluded that the optimal stimulation parameter for mPES in rats is “frequency: 5 Hz, current intensity: 1 mA for 10 min/day”, which provides a basis for future basic experimental studies of mPES in animals.

筛选改良咽部电刺激治疗大鼠中风后吞咽困难的最佳参数。
咽部电刺激(PES)是一种新型的无创外周神经刺激技术,可有效改善神经源性吞咽困难,提高临床吞咽的安全性和有效性。然而,吞咽困难动物模型的缺乏限制了 PES 的机理研究,影响了其广泛应用。因此,需要确定大鼠 PES 的最佳参数,以便进行机理研究。改良型 PES(mPES)的波形和脉宽与 PES 不同;以往的研究发现,mPES 具有与 PES 相似的神经机制。建立了脑卒中后吞咽困难(PSD)模型,并将吞咽困难的大鼠分为三种不同的强度(0.1 mA、0.5 mA 和 1 mA),以选择最佳强度;三种不同的频率(1 Hz、2 Hz 和 5 Hz),以选择最佳频率。在 mPES 治疗前后,使用视频流变学吞咽筛查(VFSS)评估大鼠的吞咽功能。结果显示,1 毫安组的吞咽功能更好(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Experimental Neurology
Experimental Neurology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
258
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Experimental Neurology, a Journal of Neuroscience Research, publishes original research in neuroscience with a particular emphasis on novel findings in neural development, regeneration, plasticity and transplantation. The journal has focused on research concerning basic mechanisms underlying neurological disorders.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信