Suicide Death Prediction Using the Maryland Suicide Data Warehouse: A Sensitivity Analysis.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
C Kitchen, A Zirikly, A Belouali, H Kharrazi, P Nestadt, H C Wilcox
{"title":"Suicide Death Prediction Using the Maryland Suicide Data Warehouse: A Sensitivity Analysis.","authors":"C Kitchen, A Zirikly, A Belouali, H Kharrazi, P Nestadt, H C Wilcox","doi":"10.1080/13811118.2024.2363227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Nearly 50,000 Americans die each year from suicide, despite suicide death being a rare event in the context of health risk assessment and modeling. Prior research has underscored the need for contextualizing suicide risk models in terms of their potential uses and generalizability. This sensitivity analysis makes use of the Maryland Suicide Data Warehouse (MSDW) and illustrates how results inform clinical decision support.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cohort of 1 million living control patients were extracted from the MSDW in addition to 1,667 patients who had died by suicide between the years 2016 and 2019 according to the Maryland Office of the Medical Examiner (OCME). Data were extracted and aggregated as part of a 4-year retrospective design. Binary logistic and two penalized regression models were deployed in a repeated fivefold cross-validation. Model performances were evaluated using sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), and F1, and model coefficients were ranked according to coefficient size.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Several features were significantly associated with patients having died by suicide, including male sex, depressive and anxiety disorder diagnoses, social needs, and prior suicidal ideation and suicide attempt. Cross-validated binary logistic regression outperformed either ridge or LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) models but generally achieved low-to-moderate PPV and sensitivity across most thresholds and a peak F1 of 0.323.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Suicide death prediction is constrained by the context of use, which determines the best balance of precision and recall. Predictive models must be evaluated close to the level of intervention. They may not hold up to different needs at different levels of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":8325,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Suicide Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Suicide Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2024.2363227","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Nearly 50,000 Americans die each year from suicide, despite suicide death being a rare event in the context of health risk assessment and modeling. Prior research has underscored the need for contextualizing suicide risk models in terms of their potential uses and generalizability. This sensitivity analysis makes use of the Maryland Suicide Data Warehouse (MSDW) and illustrates how results inform clinical decision support.

Method: A cohort of 1 million living control patients were extracted from the MSDW in addition to 1,667 patients who had died by suicide between the years 2016 and 2019 according to the Maryland Office of the Medical Examiner (OCME). Data were extracted and aggregated as part of a 4-year retrospective design. Binary logistic and two penalized regression models were deployed in a repeated fivefold cross-validation. Model performances were evaluated using sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), and F1, and model coefficients were ranked according to coefficient size.

Results: Several features were significantly associated with patients having died by suicide, including male sex, depressive and anxiety disorder diagnoses, social needs, and prior suicidal ideation and suicide attempt. Cross-validated binary logistic regression outperformed either ridge or LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) models but generally achieved low-to-moderate PPV and sensitivity across most thresholds and a peak F1 of 0.323.

Conclusions: Suicide death prediction is constrained by the context of use, which determines the best balance of precision and recall. Predictive models must be evaluated close to the level of intervention. They may not hold up to different needs at different levels of care.

使用马里兰州自杀数据仓库进行自杀死亡预测:敏感性分析。
目的:每年有近 50,000 名美国人死于自杀,尽管在健康风险评估和建模中,自杀死亡属于罕见事件。先前的研究强调,有必要根据自杀风险模型的潜在用途和普遍性对其进行背景分析。这项敏感性分析利用了马里兰州自杀数据仓库(MSDW),并说明了分析结果如何为临床决策支持提供信息:方法:根据马里兰州医学检验办公室(OCME)的数据,从 MSDW 中提取了 100 万名在世对照组患者,以及 1667 名在 2016 年至 2019 年期间自杀身亡的患者。数据提取和汇总是四年回顾性设计的一部分。在重复的五倍交叉验证中部署了二元逻辑和两个惩罚回归模型。使用灵敏度、阳性预测值(PPV)和F1对模型性能进行评估,并根据系数大小对模型系数进行排序:有几个特征与自杀死亡患者有明显关联,包括男性性别、抑郁和焦虑症诊断、社会需求、先前的自杀意念和自杀未遂。经交叉验证的二元逻辑回归结果优于岭模型或 LASSO(最小绝对收缩和选择算子)模型,但在大多数阈值下,其 PPV 和灵敏度普遍较低,峰值 F1 为 0.323:自杀死亡预测受到使用环境的限制,使用环境决定了精确度和召回率之间的最佳平衡。预测模型的评估必须贴近干预水平。它们可能无法满足不同护理级别的不同需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Archives of Suicide Research, the official journal of the International Academy of Suicide Research (IASR), is the international journal in the field of suicidology. The journal features original, refereed contributions on the study of suicide, suicidal behavior, its causes and effects, and techniques for prevention. The journal incorporates research-based and theoretical articles contributed by a diverse range of authors interested in investigating the biological, pharmacological, psychiatric, psychological, and sociological aspects of suicide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信