Key Issues in Surgical Residency Education: Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon II Committee Residency Education Subcommittee.

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Annals of surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-28 DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000006434
John D Mellinger, Karen Brasel, Eric Elster, Gerald Fried, Daniel A Hashimoto, Benjamin Jarman, Amit R T Joshi, Rachel R Kelz, Brenessa Lindeman, Carla Pugh, Richard Reznick
{"title":"Key Issues in Surgical Residency Education: Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon II Committee Residency Education Subcommittee.","authors":"John D Mellinger, Karen Brasel, Eric Elster, Gerald Fried, Daniel A Hashimoto, Benjamin Jarman, Amit R T Joshi, Rachel R Kelz, Brenessa Lindeman, Carla Pugh, Richard Reznick","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In September 2022, a summit was convened by the American Board of Surgery (ABS) to discuss competency-based reform in surgical education. A key output of that summit was the recommendation that the prior work of the Blue Ribbon I Committee convened 20 years earlier be revived. With leadership from the American College of Surgeons (ACS) and the American Surgical Association (ASA), the Blue Ribbon Committee (BRC) II was subsequently convened. This paper describes the output of the Residency Education Subcommittee of the BRC II Committee.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Subcommittee organized its work around prioritized themes, including curriculum, assessment, and transition to practice. Top recommendations, time-based action steps, potential barriers, and required resources were detailed and vetted through group discussion, broader Committee review and critique, and subsequent refinement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Primary concluding emphases included transitioning to a competency-based training model, facilitating dynamically capable curricular reform emphasizing the digital transformation of surgical care, using predictive analytic assessment strategies to optimize training effectiveness and efficiency, and creating mentorship strategies to govern the transition from training to independent practice in an outcomes-accountable fashion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To implement the recommendations outlined, it was recognized that coordinated efforts across existing organizational structures will be required, informed by data set integration strategies that meaningfully measure educational and related patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"16-20"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006434","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In September 2022, a summit was convened by the American Board of Surgery (ABS) to discuss competency-based reform in surgical education. A key output of that summit was the recommendation that the prior work of the Blue Ribbon I Committee convened 20 years earlier be revived. With leadership from the American College of Surgeons (ACS) and the American Surgical Association (ASA), the Blue Ribbon Committee (BRC) II was subsequently convened. This paper describes the output of the Residency Education Subcommittee of the BRC II Committee.

Methods: The Subcommittee organized its work around prioritized themes, including curriculum, assessment, and transition to practice. Top recommendations, time-based action steps, potential barriers, and required resources were detailed and vetted through group discussion, broader Committee review and critique, and subsequent refinement.

Results: Primary concluding emphases included transitioning to a competency-based training model, facilitating dynamically capable curricular reform emphasizing the digital transformation of surgical care, using predictive analytic assessment strategies to optimize training effectiveness and efficiency, and creating mentorship strategies to govern the transition from training to independent practice in an outcomes-accountable fashion.

Conclusions: To implement the recommendations outlined, it was recognized that coordinated efforts across existing organizational structures will be required, informed by data set integration strategies that meaningfully measure educational and related patient outcomes.

外科住院医师教育的关键问题:蓝丝带 II 委员会住院医师教育小组委员会的建议。
2022年9月,美国外科学委员会(ABS)召开了一次峰会,讨论外科教育中基于能力的改革。此次峰会的一项重要成果是建议恢复 20 年前召集的蓝丝带 I 委员会的前期工作。在美国外科学院(ACS)和美国外科学会(ASA)的领导下,蓝丝带第二委员会(BRC)随后召开了会议。本文介绍了蓝丝带委员会 II 驻院教育小组委员会的工作成果。小组委员会围绕优先主题开展工作,包括课程、评估和向实践过渡。通过小组讨论、更广泛的委员会审查和评论以及随后的完善,对首要建议、基于时间的行动步骤、潜在障碍和所需资源进行了详细说明和审查。主要的结论重点包括:过渡到以能力为基础的培训模式,促进强调外科护理数字化转型的动态课程改革,使用预测分析评估策略优化培训效果和效率,以及制定导师策略,以结果负责的方式管理从培训到独立实践的过渡。人们认识到,需要在数据集整合战略的指导下,协调现有组织结构的努力,有意义地衡量教育和相关患者的成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of surgery
Annals of surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
4.40%
发文量
687
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信