Individualized Numeric Rating Scale to Assess Pain in Critically Ill Children With Neurodevelopmental Disabilities.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Shaneel Rowe, Kaitlin M Best
{"title":"Individualized Numeric Rating Scale to Assess Pain in Critically Ill Children With Neurodevelopmental Disabilities.","authors":"Shaneel Rowe, Kaitlin M Best","doi":"10.4037/ajcc2024343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain is a significant burden for children with neurodevelopmental disabilities but is difficult for clinicians to identify. No pain assessment tools for children with neurodevelopmental disabilities have been validated for use in pediatric intensive care units. The Individualized Numeric Rating Scale (INRS) is an adapted 0-to-10 rating that includes parents' input on their child's pain indicators.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the reliability, validity, and feasibility and acceptability of use of the INRS for assessing pain in critically ill children with neurodevelopmental disabilities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study enrolled critically ill patients with neurodevelopmental disabilities aged 3 to 17 years in 2 pediatric intensive care units at a children's hospital using a prospective repeated-measures cohort design. Structured parent interviews were used to populate each patient's INRS. Bedside nurses assessed pain using the INRS throughout the study. The research team completed independent INRS ratings using video clips. Participating parents and nurses completed feasibility and acceptability surveys. Psychometric properties of the INRS and survey responses were evaluated with appropriate statistical methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For 481 paired INRS pain ratings in 34 patients, interrater reliability between nurse and research team ratings was moderate (weighted κ = 0.56). Parents said that creating the INRS was easy, made them feel more involved in care, and helped them communicate with nurses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The INRS has adequate measurement properties for assessing pain in critically ill children with neurodevelopmental disabilities. It furthers goals of patient- and family-centered care but may have implementation barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":7607,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Critical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2024343","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pain is a significant burden for children with neurodevelopmental disabilities but is difficult for clinicians to identify. No pain assessment tools for children with neurodevelopmental disabilities have been validated for use in pediatric intensive care units. The Individualized Numeric Rating Scale (INRS) is an adapted 0-to-10 rating that includes parents' input on their child's pain indicators.

Objectives: To evaluate the reliability, validity, and feasibility and acceptability of use of the INRS for assessing pain in critically ill children with neurodevelopmental disabilities.

Methods: This observational study enrolled critically ill patients with neurodevelopmental disabilities aged 3 to 17 years in 2 pediatric intensive care units at a children's hospital using a prospective repeated-measures cohort design. Structured parent interviews were used to populate each patient's INRS. Bedside nurses assessed pain using the INRS throughout the study. The research team completed independent INRS ratings using video clips. Participating parents and nurses completed feasibility and acceptability surveys. Psychometric properties of the INRS and survey responses were evaluated with appropriate statistical methods.

Results: For 481 paired INRS pain ratings in 34 patients, interrater reliability between nurse and research team ratings was moderate (weighted κ = 0.56). Parents said that creating the INRS was easy, made them feel more involved in care, and helped them communicate with nurses.

Conclusions: The INRS has adequate measurement properties for assessing pain in critically ill children with neurodevelopmental disabilities. It furthers goals of patient- and family-centered care but may have implementation barriers.

评估神经发育障碍重症儿童疼痛的个性化数字评分量表
背景:疼痛是神经发育障碍儿童的一大负担,但临床医生却很难识别疼痛。目前还没有针对神经发育障碍儿童的疼痛评估工具经过验证可用于儿科重症监护病房。个性化数字评分量表(INRS)是一种经过改编的 0-10 分制评分量表,其中包括家长对患儿疼痛指标的意见:评估使用 INRS 评估神经发育障碍重症儿童疼痛的可靠性、有效性、可行性和可接受性:这项观察性研究采用前瞻性重复测量队列设计,在一家儿童医院的两个儿科重症监护病房招募了 3 至 17 岁的神经发育障碍重症患者。通过结构化的家长访谈来填写每位患者的 INRS。床旁护士在整个研究过程中使用 INRS 评估疼痛。研究小组使用视频剪辑完成独立的 INRS 评级。参与研究的家长和护士完成了可行性和可接受性调查。采用适当的统计方法评估了 INRS 和调查回复的心理计量特性:在对 34 名患者的 481 次配对 INRS 疼痛评分中,护士和研究小组评分之间的互测可靠性为中等(加权 κ = 0.56)。家长们表示,INRS 的制作很简单,让他们感觉自己更多地参与了护理工作,并有助于他们与护士沟通:结论:INRS 具有充分的测量特性,可用于评估神经发育障碍重症患儿的疼痛。结论:INRS 具有足够的测量特性,可用于评估神经发育障碍重症患儿的疼痛。它有助于实现以患者和家属为中心的护理目标,但在实施过程中可能会遇到障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The editors of the American Journal of Critical Care (AJCC) invite authors to submit original manuscripts describing investigations, advances, or observations from all specialties related to the care of critically and acutely ill patients. Papers promoting collaborative practice and research are encouraged. Manuscripts will be considered on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere and have been submitted solely to AJCC.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信