Mathematics in U.S. Preschool and Kindergarten Classrooms

IF 3.2 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Michèle M. Mazzocco , Margaret R. Burchinal , Ann C. Schulte , Deborah Lowe Vandell , Ashley Sanabria , Jin Kyoung Hwang , Carol McDonald Connor
{"title":"Mathematics in U.S. Preschool and Kindergarten Classrooms","authors":"Michèle M. Mazzocco ,&nbsp;Margaret R. Burchinal ,&nbsp;Ann C. Schulte ,&nbsp;Deborah Lowe Vandell ,&nbsp;Ashley Sanabria ,&nbsp;Jin Kyoung Hwang ,&nbsp;Carol McDonald Connor","doi":"10.1016/j.ecresq.2024.04.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To provide a landscape of mathematics activities children experience in U.S. preschool and kindergarten classrooms, we observed time children spent in mathematics activities (and — as a contrast — literacy) in 101 geographically diverse early childhood classrooms in seven U.S. states. We also observed what mathematics content, grouping strategies, and management formats teachers engaged during classroom mathematics activities. Each observation lasted approximately 2 hours; collectively these observations focused on 930 children observed one to three times during the 2018/2019 or 2019/2020 school year. Averaging across individuals’ data within classrooms, we found that mathematics and literacy activities comprised 5% and 45% of time observed in preschool classrooms, respectively; and 25% and 42% of time observed in kindergarten classrooms, respectively. At both grades, when mathematics activities occurred, they were proportionally more often teacher-led rather than child-led. These findings raise concerns about the paucity of mathematics and over-reliance on developmentally inappropriate teacher-managed mathematics instruction in early childhood classrooms, especially preschools. Amount of time in math did not vary by preschool auspice, but time in literacy and the proportion of math time devoted to specific math content did: In Head Start classrooms we observed lowest percentage of time in literacy (and the highest percentage of time in non-instruction) compared to all other auspices. Across auspices, numeracy was the predominant math content area overall, but especially in Head Start classrooms. Thus, some aspects of early mathematics may differ with program auspice, suggesting that recommendations to increase and improve early mathematics activities may need to consider auspice characteristics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48348,"journal":{"name":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","volume":"69 ","pages":"Pages 25-37"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200624000504","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To provide a landscape of mathematics activities children experience in U.S. preschool and kindergarten classrooms, we observed time children spent in mathematics activities (and — as a contrast — literacy) in 101 geographically diverse early childhood classrooms in seven U.S. states. We also observed what mathematics content, grouping strategies, and management formats teachers engaged during classroom mathematics activities. Each observation lasted approximately 2 hours; collectively these observations focused on 930 children observed one to three times during the 2018/2019 or 2019/2020 school year. Averaging across individuals’ data within classrooms, we found that mathematics and literacy activities comprised 5% and 45% of time observed in preschool classrooms, respectively; and 25% and 42% of time observed in kindergarten classrooms, respectively. At both grades, when mathematics activities occurred, they were proportionally more often teacher-led rather than child-led. These findings raise concerns about the paucity of mathematics and over-reliance on developmentally inappropriate teacher-managed mathematics instruction in early childhood classrooms, especially preschools. Amount of time in math did not vary by preschool auspice, but time in literacy and the proportion of math time devoted to specific math content did: In Head Start classrooms we observed lowest percentage of time in literacy (and the highest percentage of time in non-instruction) compared to all other auspices. Across auspices, numeracy was the predominant math content area overall, but especially in Head Start classrooms. Thus, some aspects of early mathematics may differ with program auspice, suggesting that recommendations to increase and improve early mathematics activities may need to consider auspice characteristics.

美国学前班和幼儿园的数学课堂
为了了解儿童在美国学前班和幼儿园课堂上所经历的数学活动,我们在美国七个州的 101 个不同地域的幼儿课堂上观察了儿童在数学活动(以及作为对比的识字活动)上所花费的时间。我们还观察了教师在课堂数学活动中使用的数学内容、分组策略和管理形式。每次观察持续约 2 个小时;这些观察集中在 2018/2019 学年或 2019/2020 学年期间对 930 名儿童进行了一至三次观察。通过对班级内个人数据进行平均,我们发现数学和识字活动分别占学前班课堂观察时间的5%和45%;分别占幼儿园课堂观察时间的25%和42%。在这两个年级,如果开展数学活动,教师主导的比例往往高于儿童主导的比例。这些发现引起了人们对幼儿课堂(尤其是学前班)中数学活动过少以及过度依赖不适合幼儿发展的教师管理的数学教学的担忧。数学课的时间并不因学前教育机构的不同而不同,但识字课的时间和用于特定数学内容的数学课时间比例却有差异:在启蒙教育的课堂上,我们观察到识字时间所占比例最低(非教学时间所占比例最高)。在所有支持机构中,算术是最主要的数学内容,尤其是在启蒙课堂。因此,早期数学的某些方面可能会随着项目支持的不同而有所差异,这表明增加和改进早期数学活动的建议可能需要考虑支持的特点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
8.10%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: For over twenty years, Early Childhood Research Quarterly (ECRQ) has influenced the field of early childhood education and development through the publication of empirical research that meets the highest standards of scholarly and practical significance. ECRQ publishes predominantly empirical research (quantitative or qualitative methods) on issues of interest to early childhood development, theory, and educational practice (Birth through 8 years of age). The journal also occasionally publishes practitioner and/or policy perspectives, book reviews, and significant reviews of research. As an applied journal, we are interested in work that has social, policy, and educational relevance and implications and work that strengthens links between research and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信