Artificial Intelligence for Otosclerosis Detection: A Pilot Study.

Antoine Emin, Sophie Daubié, Loïc Gaillandre, Arthur Aouad, Jean Baptiste Pialat, Valentin Favier, Florent Carsuzaa, Stéphane Tringali, Maxime Fieux
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence for Otosclerosis Detection: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Antoine Emin, Sophie Daubié, Loïc Gaillandre, Arthur Aouad, Jean Baptiste Pialat, Valentin Favier, Florent Carsuzaa, Stéphane Tringali, Maxime Fieux","doi":"10.1007/s10278-024-01079-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The gold standard for otosclerosis diagnosis, aside from surgery, is high-resolution temporal bone computed tomography (TBCT), but it can be compromised by the small size of the lesions. Many artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms exist, but they are not yet used in daily practice for otosclerosis diagnosis. The aim was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of AI in the detection of otosclerosis. This case-control study included patients with otosclerosis surgically confirmed (2010-2020) and control patients who underwent TBCT and for whom radiological data were available. The AI algorithm interpreted the TBCT to assign a positive or negative diagnosis of otosclerosis. A double-blind reading was then performed by two trained radiologists, and the diagnostic performances were compared according to the best combination of sensitivity and specificity (Youden index). A total of 274 TBCT were included (174 TBCT cases and 100 TBCT controls). For the AI algorithm, the best combination of sensitivity and specificity was 79% and 98%, with an ideal diagnostic probability value estimated by the Youden index at 59%. For radiological analysis, sensitivity was 84% and specificity 98%. The diagnostic performance of the AI algorithm was comparable to that of a trained radiologist, although the sensitivity at the estimated ideal threshold was lower.</p>","PeriodicalId":516858,"journal":{"name":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2931-2939"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11612047/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-024-01079-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The gold standard for otosclerosis diagnosis, aside from surgery, is high-resolution temporal bone computed tomography (TBCT), but it can be compromised by the small size of the lesions. Many artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms exist, but they are not yet used in daily practice for otosclerosis diagnosis. The aim was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of AI in the detection of otosclerosis. This case-control study included patients with otosclerosis surgically confirmed (2010-2020) and control patients who underwent TBCT and for whom radiological data were available. The AI algorithm interpreted the TBCT to assign a positive or negative diagnosis of otosclerosis. A double-blind reading was then performed by two trained radiologists, and the diagnostic performances were compared according to the best combination of sensitivity and specificity (Youden index). A total of 274 TBCT were included (174 TBCT cases and 100 TBCT controls). For the AI algorithm, the best combination of sensitivity and specificity was 79% and 98%, with an ideal diagnostic probability value estimated by the Youden index at 59%. For radiological analysis, sensitivity was 84% and specificity 98%. The diagnostic performance of the AI algorithm was comparable to that of a trained radiologist, although the sensitivity at the estimated ideal threshold was lower.

Abstract Image

人工智能检测耳硬化症:试点研究
除手术外,耳硬化症诊断的金标准是高分辨率颞骨计算机断层扫描(TBCT),但它可能会因病变体积小而受到影响。目前已有许多人工智能(AI)算法,但尚未用于耳硬化症的日常诊断。本研究旨在评估人工智能在耳硬化症检测中的诊断性能。这项病例对照研究纳入了经手术确诊的耳硬化症患者(2010-2020 年)和接受过 TBCT 且有放射学数据的对照组患者。人工智能算法对 TBCT 进行判读,给出耳硬化症的阳性或阴性诊断。然后由两名训练有素的放射科医生进行双盲判读,并根据灵敏度和特异性的最佳组合(尤登指数)对诊断结果进行比较。共纳入了 274 份 TBCT(174 份 TBCT 病例和 100 份 TBCT 对照)。就人工智能算法而言,灵敏度和特异性的最佳组合分别为 79% 和 98%,尤登指数估计的理想诊断概率值为 59%。放射学分析的灵敏度为 84%,特异性为 98%。人工智能算法的诊断性能与训练有素的放射科医生不相上下,但在估计的理想阈值下灵敏度较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信