Written communication and the ICU team experience (WRITE): A pre-post intervention study

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Jane J. Lee , Shubha Mathur , James Gerhart , Crystal M. Glover , Ethan Ritz , Santosh Basapur , Jared A. Greenberg
{"title":"Written communication and the ICU team experience (WRITE): A pre-post intervention study","authors":"Jane J. Lee ,&nbsp;Shubha Mathur ,&nbsp;James Gerhart ,&nbsp;Crystal M. Glover ,&nbsp;Ethan Ritz ,&nbsp;Santosh Basapur ,&nbsp;Jared A. Greenberg","doi":"10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Families of critically ill patients may benefit from receiving a written update of patient care each day. Our objective was to develop a system to facilitate care provider creation of written updates and to determine the effect of implementing this process on the care provider experience.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>The experiences of ICU care providers (nurses, advanced practice providers, and physicians) were measured monthly during a 3-month pre-intervention and a 3-month intervention period. During the intervention period, written updates were sent to families each day and posted in the electronic medical record. Study investigators assisted by editing and distributing the written communication to families.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>An urban academic medical center in the United States.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><p>Nurse-Physician Collaboration Scale (NPCS) and Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Over the 3-month intervention period, care providers created written communication for families of 152 patients (average 5 ICU days per family). NPCS scores among the 65 participating care providers were significantly lower, indicating greater collaboration during the intervention vs. pre-intervention period: 49.9 (95 % CI 46.4–53.6) vs. 55.4 (95 % CI 51.5–59.3), p = 0.002. MBI scores were similar during the intervention vs. pre-intervention periods. A subset of care providers participated in individual interviews. Care providers reported that the process of creating written communication was acceptable and had clear benefits for both families and the medical team.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Use of written communication as a supplement to verbal communication improves collaboration among ICU care providers without affecting symptoms of burnout.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><p>We created a system to facilitate written communication with ICU families that was acceptable to care providers and improved aspects of their experience. In the future, use of written communication can be enhanced with refinements to the process that reduce the time spent creating written updates while highlighting the benefits to families and care providers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51322,"journal":{"name":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339724001381","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Families of critically ill patients may benefit from receiving a written update of patient care each day. Our objective was to develop a system to facilitate care provider creation of written updates and to determine the effect of implementing this process on the care provider experience.

Design

The experiences of ICU care providers (nurses, advanced practice providers, and physicians) were measured monthly during a 3-month pre-intervention and a 3-month intervention period. During the intervention period, written updates were sent to families each day and posted in the electronic medical record. Study investigators assisted by editing and distributing the written communication to families.

Setting

An urban academic medical center in the United States.

Main outcome measures

Nurse-Physician Collaboration Scale (NPCS) and Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI).

Results

Over the 3-month intervention period, care providers created written communication for families of 152 patients (average 5 ICU days per family). NPCS scores among the 65 participating care providers were significantly lower, indicating greater collaboration during the intervention vs. pre-intervention period: 49.9 (95 % CI 46.4–53.6) vs. 55.4 (95 % CI 51.5–59.3), p = 0.002. MBI scores were similar during the intervention vs. pre-intervention periods. A subset of care providers participated in individual interviews. Care providers reported that the process of creating written communication was acceptable and had clear benefits for both families and the medical team.

Conclusions

Use of written communication as a supplement to verbal communication improves collaboration among ICU care providers without affecting symptoms of burnout.

Implications for practice

We created a system to facilitate written communication with ICU families that was acceptable to care providers and improved aspects of their experience. In the future, use of written communication can be enhanced with refinements to the process that reduce the time spent creating written updates while highlighting the benefits to families and care providers.

书面交流与重症监护室团队经验 (WRITE):事后干预研究。
目的:危重病人的家属可能会从每天收到的病人护理书面更新中受益。我们的目标是开发一套系统,方便护理人员创建书面更新,并确定实施该流程对护理人员体验的影响:设计:在为期 3 个月的干预前和 3 个月的干预期间,每月对重症监护病房护理人员(护士、高级护理人员和医生)的体验进行测量。在干预期间,每天向家属发送书面更新信息,并在电子病历中发布。研究调查人员协助编辑并向患者家属分发书面通知:主要结果测量:主要结果测量:护士-医生协作量表(NPCS)和马斯拉奇职业倦怠量表(MBI):在为期 3 个月的干预期间,护理人员为 152 名患者的家属(平均每个家属在重症监护室住 5 天)建立了书面沟通。65 名参与干预的护理提供者的 NPCS 分数明显降低,这表明干预期间与干预前相比,护理提供者之间的合作更加密切:49.9 (95 % CI 46.4-53.6) vs. 55.4 (95 % CI 51.5-59.3),p = 0.002。干预期间与干预前的 MBI 分数相似。一部分护理提供者参加了个人访谈。医疗服务提供者表示,创建书面交流的过程是可以接受的,而且对家庭和医疗团队都有明显的好处:结论:使用书面交流作为口头交流的补充,可以改善重症监护病房护理人员之间的合作,同时不会影响职业倦怠症状:我们创建了一个系统来促进与重症监护病房家属的书面沟通,该系统为护理人员所接受,并改善了他们的各方面体验。今后,可以通过改进流程来加强书面交流的使用,从而减少创建书面更新所花费的时间,同时强调对家属和护理提供者的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
15.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The aims of Intensive and Critical Care Nursing are to promote excellence of care of critically ill patients by specialist nurses and their professional colleagues; to provide an international and interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and exchange of research findings, experience and ideas; to develop and enhance the knowledge, skills, attitudes and creative thinking essential to good critical care nursing practice. The journal publishes reviews, updates and feature articles in addition to original papers and significant preliminary communications. Articles may deal with any part of practice including relevant clinical, research, educational, psychological and technological aspects.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信