M. Villar Martínez , E. Calvo Manuel , A.L. Aguilar-Shea
{"title":"Revisión narrativa de la terapia inhalatoria en la EPOC","authors":"M. Villar Martínez , E. Calvo Manuel , A.L. Aguilar-Shea","doi":"10.1016/j.semerg.2024.102284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The basis of COPD maintenance treatment is the long-acting bronchodilators and the inhaled corticosteroids. Faced with the recent modifications in the clinical practice guidelines, we have carried out a review of studies that contrast the various therapeutic alternatives and pharmacological agents within each category, with the fundamental purpose of shedding light on which of these options prove to be more effective.</p><p>Triple therapy stands out as essential in poorly controlled patients or with an eosinophilic phenotype, surpassing dual therapy. However, among the combinations of LAMA/LABA or LAMA/LABA/IC, no drug is observed to be superior in the reviewed evidence. Although triple therapies include corticosteroids, there does not appear to be a significant increase in side effects or pneumonia. Regarding monotherapy with LAMA, no significant differences are seen between the drugs, but in dual therapy with LABA/IC, the budesonide/formoterol combination seems to offer better control than fluticasone/salmeterol.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1138359324000947","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The basis of COPD maintenance treatment is the long-acting bronchodilators and the inhaled corticosteroids. Faced with the recent modifications in the clinical practice guidelines, we have carried out a review of studies that contrast the various therapeutic alternatives and pharmacological agents within each category, with the fundamental purpose of shedding light on which of these options prove to be more effective.
Triple therapy stands out as essential in poorly controlled patients or with an eosinophilic phenotype, surpassing dual therapy. However, among the combinations of LAMA/LABA or LAMA/LABA/IC, no drug is observed to be superior in the reviewed evidence. Although triple therapies include corticosteroids, there does not appear to be a significant increase in side effects or pneumonia. Regarding monotherapy with LAMA, no significant differences are seen between the drugs, but in dual therapy with LABA/IC, the budesonide/formoterol combination seems to offer better control than fluticasone/salmeterol.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病维持治疗的基础是长效支气管扩张剂和吸入皮质类固醇。面对最近对临床实践指南的修改,我们对各项研究进行了回顾,对比了每一类药物中的各种替代疗法和药理制剂,其根本目的是阐明这些方案中哪一种更有效。在病情控制不佳或具有嗜酸性粒细胞表型的患者中,三联疗法的重要性超过了二联疗法。然而,在LAMA/LABA或LAMA/LABA/IC的组合中,在已审查的证据中没有发现任何药物具有优越性。虽然三联疗法包括皮质类固醇,但副作用或肺炎似乎并未显著增加。关于 LAMA 单药治疗,不同药物之间没有明显差异,但在 LABA/IC 双药治疗中,布地奈德/福莫特罗组合似乎比氟替卡松/沙美特罗的控制效果更好。