A cross-sectional study of academic success measures, grit, and resilience among US dental students.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Carly Timmons McKenzie, David Alexandre Cruz Walma
{"title":"A cross-sectional study of academic success measures, grit, and resilience among US dental students.","authors":"Carly Timmons McKenzie, David Alexandre Cruz Walma","doi":"10.1002/jdd.13627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study explored themes previously identified as central to holistic professional school success, as related to traditional academic achievement, resilience, and grit measures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study surveyed third- and fourth-year US dental students. Items addressed themes previously identified as central to professional school success, including need for cognition, patient ownership, collective orientation, grit, and resilience. Traditional academic metrics were also included. Statistical analyses comprised one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), simple linear regression, and stepwise multiple regression procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 126 students participated (81% response rate). Collective orientation, need for cognition, patient ownership, and resilience did not significantly correlate with grade point average (GPA), whereas grit did, r = 0.29. Need for cognition and patient ownership combined significantly predicted grit with approximately 35% of variance explained. Approximately 25% of variance in resilience scores was accounted for by need for cognition, coupled with collective orientation. Grit and resilience significantly correlated, r = 0.59.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Grit significantly predicted both traditional and alternative metrics of success among dental students, particularly need for cognition and patient ownership. A high need for cognition is consistent among students who display both grit and resilience. Neither resilience nor the alternative measures of success predicted traditional academic metrics.</p>","PeriodicalId":50216,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.13627","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study explored themes previously identified as central to holistic professional school success, as related to traditional academic achievement, resilience, and grit measures.

Methods: This cross-sectional study surveyed third- and fourth-year US dental students. Items addressed themes previously identified as central to professional school success, including need for cognition, patient ownership, collective orientation, grit, and resilience. Traditional academic metrics were also included. Statistical analyses comprised one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), simple linear regression, and stepwise multiple regression procedures.

Results: A total of 126 students participated (81% response rate). Collective orientation, need for cognition, patient ownership, and resilience did not significantly correlate with grade point average (GPA), whereas grit did, r = 0.29. Need for cognition and patient ownership combined significantly predicted grit with approximately 35% of variance explained. Approximately 25% of variance in resilience scores was accounted for by need for cognition, coupled with collective orientation. Grit and resilience significantly correlated, r = 0.59.

Conclusions: Grit significantly predicted both traditional and alternative metrics of success among dental students, particularly need for cognition and patient ownership. A high need for cognition is consistent among students who display both grit and resilience. Neither resilience nor the alternative measures of success predicted traditional academic metrics.

对美国牙科学生的学业成功衡量标准、勇气和韧性的横断面研究。
目的:本研究探讨了以前被认为是职业学校整体成功核心的主题,这些主题与传统的学业成绩、抗挫力和勇气措施有关:这项横断面研究调查了美国三年级和四年级的牙科学生。调查项目涉及之前被确定为职业学校成功核心的主题,包括认知需求、患者自主权、集体导向、勇气和韧性。传统的学术指标也包括在内。统计分析包括单因素方差分析(ANOVA)、简单线性回归和逐步多元回归程序:共有 126 名学生参与了调查(回复率为 81%)。集体取向、认知需求、患者自主性和复原力与平均学分绩点(GPA)无显著相关性,而勇气与平均学分绩点(GPA)有显著相关性,r = 0.29。认知需求和患者自主性合在一起可以显著预测勇气,解释了大约 35% 的方差。约 25% 的复原力得分差异由认知需求和集体导向共同解释。勇气和复原力之间存在明显的相关性,r = 0.59:勇气对牙科学生成功的传统指标和替代指标都有明显的预测作用,尤其是认知需求和患者自主权。同时表现出勇气和韧性的学生对认知的需求较高。抗挫折能力和其他成功指标都不能预测传统的学术指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Dental Education
Journal of Dental Education 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
21.70%
发文量
274
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dental Education (JDE) is a peer-reviewed monthly journal that publishes a wide variety of educational and scientific research in dental, allied dental and advanced dental education. Published continuously by the American Dental Education Association since 1936 and internationally recognized as the premier journal for academic dentistry, the JDE publishes articles on such topics as curriculum reform, education research methods, innovative educational and assessment methodologies, faculty development, community-based dental education, student recruitment and admissions, professional and educational ethics, dental education around the world and systematic reviews of educational interest. The JDE is one of the top scholarly journals publishing the most important work in oral health education today; it celebrated its 80th anniversary in 2016.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信