Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Patients With Stage I Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Untreated With Chemotherapy.

IF 28.4 1区 医学 Q1 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Veerle C M Geurts, Sara Balduzzi, Tessa G Steenbruggen, Sabine C Linn, Sabine Siesling, Sunil S Badve, Angela DeMichele, Michail Ignatiadis, Roberto A Leon-Ferre, Matthew P Goetz, Antonio C Wolff, Natalie Klar, Stefan Michiels, Sherene Loi, Sylvia Adams, Hugo M Horlings, Gabe S Sonke, Roberto Salgado, Marleen Kok
{"title":"Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Patients With Stage I Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Untreated With Chemotherapy.","authors":"Veerle C M Geurts, Sara Balduzzi, Tessa G Steenbruggen, Sabine C Linn, Sabine Siesling, Sunil S Badve, Angela DeMichele, Michail Ignatiadis, Roberto A Leon-Ferre, Matthew P Goetz, Antonio C Wolff, Natalie Klar, Stefan Michiels, Sherene Loi, Sylvia Adams, Hugo M Horlings, Gabe S Sonke, Roberto Salgado, Marleen Kok","doi":"10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.1917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The absolute benefit of chemotherapy for all patients with stage I triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is unclear, and biomarkers are not currently available for selecting patients with an excellent outcome for whom neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy may have negligible benefit. High levels of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) are associated with favorable survival in TNBC, but data solely in stage I TNBC are lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the outcomes of patients of all ages with stage I TNBC solely and who received neither neoadjuvant nor adjuvant chemotherapy, according to centrally reviewed sTIL levels at prespecified cutoffs.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cohort study used the Netherlands Cancer Registry to identify patients diagnosed with stage I TNBC between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2015, who were not treated with chemotherapy. Only patients who did not receive neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant chemotherapy were selected. The clinical data were matched with their corresponding pathology data provided by the Dutch Pathology Registry. Data analysis was performed between February and October 2023.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary end point was breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) at 5, 10, and 15 years for the prespecified sTIL level cutoffs of 30%, 50%, and 75%. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides were used for central review of histologic subtype, grade, and lymphovascular invasion. The International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group guidelines were used to score the sTIL levels; these levels were determined for 1041 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of a total of 4511 females with stage I TNBC, patients who were not treated with chemotherapy were selected and tissue blocks requested; sTILs were scored in 1041 patients (mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 64.4 [11.1] years, median follow-up 11.4 [95% CI, 10.9-11.9] years) who were included in the analyses.. Most tumors (952 [91.5%]) were invasive carcinomas of nonspecial histologic subtype. Most patients (548 [52.6%]) had pT1cN0 tumors. Median (range) sTIL level was 5% (1%-99%). A total of 775 patients (74.4%) had sTIL levels below 30%, 266 (25.6%) had 30% or greater, 203 (19.5%) had 50% or greater, and 141 (13.5%) had 75% or greater. Patients with pT1abN0 tumors had a more favorable outcome vs patients with pT1cN0 tumors, with a 10-year BCSS of 92% (95% CI, 89%-94%) vs 86% (95% CI, 82%-89%). In the overall cohort, sTIL levels of at least 30% were associated with better BCSS compared with sTIL levels less than 30% (96% and 87%, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% CI, 0.26-0.77). High sTIL levels of 50% or greater were associated with a better outcome than low sTIL levels of less than 50% (HR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.10-0.74) in patients with pT1C tumors, with a 10-year BCSS of 95% increasing to 98% with sTIL levels of 75% or greater.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Results of this study showed that patients with stage I TNBC and high level of sTILs who did not receive neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy had excellent 10-year BCSS. The findings further support the role of sTILs as integral biomarkers in prospective clinical trials of therapy optimization for this patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":48661,"journal":{"name":"Jama Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":28.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11211993/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jama Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.1917","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: The absolute benefit of chemotherapy for all patients with stage I triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is unclear, and biomarkers are not currently available for selecting patients with an excellent outcome for whom neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy may have negligible benefit. High levels of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) are associated with favorable survival in TNBC, but data solely in stage I TNBC are lacking.

Objective: To examine the outcomes of patients of all ages with stage I TNBC solely and who received neither neoadjuvant nor adjuvant chemotherapy, according to centrally reviewed sTIL levels at prespecified cutoffs.

Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study used the Netherlands Cancer Registry to identify patients diagnosed with stage I TNBC between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2015, who were not treated with chemotherapy. Only patients who did not receive neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant chemotherapy were selected. The clinical data were matched with their corresponding pathology data provided by the Dutch Pathology Registry. Data analysis was performed between February and October 2023.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary end point was breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) at 5, 10, and 15 years for the prespecified sTIL level cutoffs of 30%, 50%, and 75%. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides were used for central review of histologic subtype, grade, and lymphovascular invasion. The International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group guidelines were used to score the sTIL levels; these levels were determined for 1041 patients.

Results: Of a total of 4511 females with stage I TNBC, patients who were not treated with chemotherapy were selected and tissue blocks requested; sTILs were scored in 1041 patients (mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 64.4 [11.1] years, median follow-up 11.4 [95% CI, 10.9-11.9] years) who were included in the analyses.. Most tumors (952 [91.5%]) were invasive carcinomas of nonspecial histologic subtype. Most patients (548 [52.6%]) had pT1cN0 tumors. Median (range) sTIL level was 5% (1%-99%). A total of 775 patients (74.4%) had sTIL levels below 30%, 266 (25.6%) had 30% or greater, 203 (19.5%) had 50% or greater, and 141 (13.5%) had 75% or greater. Patients with pT1abN0 tumors had a more favorable outcome vs patients with pT1cN0 tumors, with a 10-year BCSS of 92% (95% CI, 89%-94%) vs 86% (95% CI, 82%-89%). In the overall cohort, sTIL levels of at least 30% were associated with better BCSS compared with sTIL levels less than 30% (96% and 87%, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% CI, 0.26-0.77). High sTIL levels of 50% or greater were associated with a better outcome than low sTIL levels of less than 50% (HR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.10-0.74) in patients with pT1C tumors, with a 10-year BCSS of 95% increasing to 98% with sTIL levels of 75% or greater.

Conclusions and relevance: Results of this study showed that patients with stage I TNBC and high level of sTILs who did not receive neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy had excellent 10-year BCSS. The findings further support the role of sTILs as integral biomarkers in prospective clinical trials of therapy optimization for this patient population.

未经化疗的 I 期三阴性乳腺癌患者的肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞
重要性:化疗对所有 I 期三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)患者的绝对益处尚不明确,目前还没有生物标志物可用于选择新辅助化疗或辅助化疗对其益处可能微乎其微的预后良好的患者。高水平的基质肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞(sTILs)与TNBC患者的良好生存有关,但目前还缺乏仅针对I期TNBC患者的数据:目的:根据在预设临界值下集中审查的sTIL水平,研究仅为I期TNBC且既未接受新辅助化疗也未接受辅助化疗的各年龄段患者的预后情况:这项队列研究利用荷兰癌症登记处来识别2005年1月1日至2015年12月31日期间确诊的未接受化疗的I期TNBC患者。只有未接受新辅助化疗和/或辅助化疗的患者才被选中。临床数据与荷兰病理登记处提供的相应病理数据相匹配。数据分析在2023年2月至10月期间进行:主要终点是预设的sTIL水平临界值为30%、50%和75%时,5年、10年和15年的乳腺癌特异性生存率(BCSS)。血沉和伊红染色的切片用于组织学亚型、分级和淋巴管侵犯的集中审查。采用国际免疫肿瘤生物标记物工作组指南对 sTIL 水平进行评分,确定了 1041 名患者的 sTIL 水平:共纳入4511名I期TNBC女性患者(平均[标码]诊断年龄为64.4[11.1]岁;中位随访时间为11.4[95% CI, 10.9-11.9]年)。大多数肿瘤(952 [91.5%])为非特殊组织学亚型浸润癌。大多数患者(548 [52.6%])的肿瘤为 pT1cN0。sTIL水平中位数(范围)为5%(1%-99%)。共有 775 名患者(74.4%)的 sTIL 水平低于 30%,266 名(25.6%)高于 30%,203 名(19.5%)高于 50%,141 名(13.5%)高于 75%。与pT1cN0肿瘤患者相比,pT1abN0肿瘤患者的预后更佳,10年BCSS为92%(95% CI,89%-94%)vs 86%(95% CI,82%-89%)。在整个队列中,与低于30%的sTIL水平相比,至少30%的sTIL水平与更好的BCSS相关(分别为96%和87%;危险比[HR],0.45;95% CI,0.26-0.77)。在pT1C肿瘤患者中,sTIL水平达到或超过50%的患者比sTIL水平低于50%的患者预后更好(HR,0.27;95% CI,0.10-0.74),sTIL水平达到或超过75%的患者10年BCSS为95%,而sTIL水平达到或超过75%的患者10年BCSS为98%:本研究结果显示,未接受新辅助或辅助化疗的I期TNBC和高水平sTILs患者的10年BCSS非常好。研究结果进一步支持了sTILs在该患者群体治疗优化的前瞻性临床试验中作为不可或缺的生物标志物的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Jama Oncology
Jama Oncology Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
37.50
自引率
1.80%
发文量
423
期刊介绍: At JAMA Oncology, our primary goal is to contribute to the advancement of oncology research and enhance patient care. As a leading journal in the field, we strive to publish influential original research, opinions, and reviews that push the boundaries of oncology science. Our mission is to serve as the definitive resource for scientists, clinicians, and trainees in oncology globally. Through our innovative and timely scientific and educational content, we aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of cancer pathogenesis and the latest treatment advancements to our readers. We are dedicated to effectively disseminating the findings of significant clinical research, major scientific breakthroughs, actionable discoveries, and state-of-the-art treatment pathways to the oncology community. Our ultimate objective is to facilitate the translation of new knowledge into tangible clinical benefits for individuals living with and surviving cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信