Estimating substance use disparities across intersectional social positions using machine learning: An application of group-lasso interaction network.

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Connor J McCabe, Jonathan L Helm, Max A Halvorson, Kieran J Blaikie, Christine M Lee, Isaac C Rhew
{"title":"Estimating substance use disparities across intersectional social positions using machine learning: An application of group-lasso interaction network.","authors":"Connor J McCabe, Jonathan L Helm, Max A Halvorson, Kieran J Blaikie, Christine M Lee, Isaac C Rhew","doi":"10.1037/adb0001020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>An aim of quantitative intersectional research is to model the joint impact of multiple social positions on health risk behaviors. Although moderated multiple regression is frequently used to pursue intersectional research hypotheses, such parametric approaches may produce unreliable effect estimates due to data sparsity and high dimensionality. Machine learning provides viable alternatives, offering greater flexibility in evaluating many candidate interactions amid sparse data conditions, yet remains rarely employed. This study introduces group-lasso interaction network (glinternet), a novel machine learning approach involving hierarchical regularization, to assess intersectional differences in substance use prevalence.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Utilizing variable selection and parameter stabilization functionality for main and interaction effects, glinternet was employed to examine two-way interactions between three primary social positions (gender, sexual orientation, and race) predicting heavy episodic drinking, cannabis use, and cigarette use prevalence. Analyses were conducted using the All of Us Research Program (<i>N</i> = 283,403), a national sample with high representation from populations historically underrepresented in biomedical research. Results were replicated using holdout cross-validation and compared against logistic regression estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Glinternet prevalence estimates were more stable across discovery and replication samples relative to logistic regression, particularly among sparsely represented groups. Prevalence estimates for cigarette and cannabis use were elevated among sexual minority and White cisgender women compared to heterosexual and non-White women, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Glinternet may improve upon traditional moderated multiple regression methods for pursuing intersectional hypotheses by improving model parsimony and parameter stability, providing novel means for quantifying health disparities among intersectional social positions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48325,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Addictive Behaviors","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of Addictive Behaviors","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0001020","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: An aim of quantitative intersectional research is to model the joint impact of multiple social positions on health risk behaviors. Although moderated multiple regression is frequently used to pursue intersectional research hypotheses, such parametric approaches may produce unreliable effect estimates due to data sparsity and high dimensionality. Machine learning provides viable alternatives, offering greater flexibility in evaluating many candidate interactions amid sparse data conditions, yet remains rarely employed. This study introduces group-lasso interaction network (glinternet), a novel machine learning approach involving hierarchical regularization, to assess intersectional differences in substance use prevalence.

Method: Utilizing variable selection and parameter stabilization functionality for main and interaction effects, glinternet was employed to examine two-way interactions between three primary social positions (gender, sexual orientation, and race) predicting heavy episodic drinking, cannabis use, and cigarette use prevalence. Analyses were conducted using the All of Us Research Program (N = 283,403), a national sample with high representation from populations historically underrepresented in biomedical research. Results were replicated using holdout cross-validation and compared against logistic regression estimates.

Results: Glinternet prevalence estimates were more stable across discovery and replication samples relative to logistic regression, particularly among sparsely represented groups. Prevalence estimates for cigarette and cannabis use were elevated among sexual minority and White cisgender women compared to heterosexual and non-White women, respectively.

Conclusions: Glinternet may improve upon traditional moderated multiple regression methods for pursuing intersectional hypotheses by improving model parsimony and parameter stability, providing novel means for quantifying health disparities among intersectional social positions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

利用机器学习估算跨社会地位的药物使用差异:群体-厕所互动网络的应用。
目的:定量交叉研究的目的之一是模拟多种社会地位对健康风险行为的共同影响。虽然调节多元回归常用于交叉研究假设,但由于数据稀少和维度较高,这种参数方法可能会产生不可靠的效应估计。机器学习提供了可行的替代方法,在稀少数据条件下评估许多候选交互作用时具有更大的灵活性,但仍然很少被采用。本研究介绍了一种涉及分层正则化的新型机器学习方法--群体-流索交互网络(grinternet),用于评估药物使用流行率的交叉差异:方法:利用主效应和交互效应的变量选择和参数稳定功能,使用 glinternet 来研究三种主要社会地位(性别、性取向和种族)之间的双向交互作用,以预测大量偶发性饮酒、大麻使用和香烟使用流行率。分析使用了 "我们所有人研究计划"(N = 283,403),该计划是一个全国性样本,其中有大量来自生物医学研究中历来代表性不足的人群。结果通过保留交叉验证进行了复制,并与逻辑回归估计值进行了比较:结果:相对于逻辑回归,Glinternet 流行率估计值在发现样本和复制样本中更为稳定,尤其是在代表性稀少的群体中。与异性恋女性和非白人女性相比,性少数群体和白人顺性别女性使用香烟和大麻的流行率估计值分别有所上升:结论:Glinternet 可以通过提高模型的简约性和参数的稳定性,改进传统的节制多元回归方法,从而为量化交叉社会地位之间的健康差异提供新的手段。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.80%
发文量
165
期刊介绍: Psychology of Addictive Behaviors publishes peer-reviewed original articles related to the psychological aspects of addictive behaviors. The journal includes articles on the following topics: - alcohol and alcoholism - drug use and abuse - eating disorders - smoking and nicotine addiction, and other excessive behaviors (e.g., gambling) Full-length research reports, literature reviews, brief reports, and comments are published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信