Randomized clinical trial on safety of the natriuretic peptide ularitide as treatment of refractory cirrhotic ascites.

IF 8.3 2区 材料科学 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces Pub Date : 2024-06-27 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1097/HC9.0000000000000481
Rasmus H Gantzel, Emilie E Møller, Niels K Aagaard, Hugh Watson, Peter Jepsen, Henning Grønbæk
{"title":"Randomized clinical trial on safety of the natriuretic peptide ularitide as treatment of refractory cirrhotic ascites.","authors":"Rasmus H Gantzel, Emilie E Møller, Niels K Aagaard, Hugh Watson, Peter Jepsen, Henning Grønbæk","doi":"10.1097/HC9.0000000000000481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sodium and water retention is a mainstay of the pathophysiology leading to ascites formation in patients with advanced cirrhosis. Refractory ascites denotes the most severe ascites status with limited treatment options and a poor prognosis. We investigated the efficacy and safety of the natriuretic peptide ularitide in patients with refractory cirrhotic ascites.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a randomized placebo-controlled trial investigating ularitide to manage refractory ascites. Until trial termination after interim analyses, we randomized 17 participants in a 2:1 ratio between ularitide (n=11) and placebo (n=6). While hospitalized, the participants received treatment for up to 48 hours. The primary efficacy endpoint was a change in renal water excretion, and secondary end points included changes in renal sodium excretion rate and body weight. The starting dose was 30 ng/kg/min, though later reduced to 20 for safety reasons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In contrast to the study hypothesis, the mean urine production decreased after 24 hours of ularitide treatment compared with the baseline level (22.8 vs. 47.5 mL/h, p=0.04) and decreased more in participants randomized to ularitide than placebo (24.7 vs. -6.2 mL/h, p=0.05). Ularitide did not increase the renal sodium excretion rate or reduce the weight gain. The incidence rate ratio of adverse reactions in ularitide versus placebo was 8.5 (95% CI: 2-35, p=0.003). Participants treated with ularitide developed serious blood pressure reductions, impacting their renal responsiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ularitide in doses of 20-30 ng/kg/min did not benefit urine production and renal sodium excretion rate in patients with refractory ascites. The participants randomized to ularitide overall developed more adverse reactions than placebo. EudraCT no. 2019-002268-28.</p>","PeriodicalId":5,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11213594/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HC9.0000000000000481","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sodium and water retention is a mainstay of the pathophysiology leading to ascites formation in patients with advanced cirrhosis. Refractory ascites denotes the most severe ascites status with limited treatment options and a poor prognosis. We investigated the efficacy and safety of the natriuretic peptide ularitide in patients with refractory cirrhotic ascites.

Methods: We conducted a randomized placebo-controlled trial investigating ularitide to manage refractory ascites. Until trial termination after interim analyses, we randomized 17 participants in a 2:1 ratio between ularitide (n=11) and placebo (n=6). While hospitalized, the participants received treatment for up to 48 hours. The primary efficacy endpoint was a change in renal water excretion, and secondary end points included changes in renal sodium excretion rate and body weight. The starting dose was 30 ng/kg/min, though later reduced to 20 for safety reasons.

Results: In contrast to the study hypothesis, the mean urine production decreased after 24 hours of ularitide treatment compared with the baseline level (22.8 vs. 47.5 mL/h, p=0.04) and decreased more in participants randomized to ularitide than placebo (24.7 vs. -6.2 mL/h, p=0.05). Ularitide did not increase the renal sodium excretion rate or reduce the weight gain. The incidence rate ratio of adverse reactions in ularitide versus placebo was 8.5 (95% CI: 2-35, p=0.003). Participants treated with ularitide developed serious blood pressure reductions, impacting their renal responsiveness.

Conclusions: Ularitide in doses of 20-30 ng/kg/min did not benefit urine production and renal sodium excretion rate in patients with refractory ascites. The participants randomized to ularitide overall developed more adverse reactions than placebo. EudraCT no. 2019-002268-28.

关于钠尿肽 ularitide 治疗难治性肝硬化腹水安全性的随机临床试验。
背景:钠和水潴留是导致晚期肝硬化患者腹水形成的主要病理生理因素。难治性腹水是最严重的腹水状态,治疗方案有限,预后较差。我们研究了钠尿肽乌拉利肽对难治性肝硬化腹水患者的疗效和安全性:我们进行了一项随机安慰剂对照试验,研究用乌拉利肽治疗难治性腹水。直到中期分析后试验终止,我们按照 2:1 的比例将 17 名参与者随机分配到乌拉利肽(11 人)和安慰剂(6 人)中。在住院期间,参与者接受了长达 48 小时的治疗。主要疗效终点是肾水排泄量的变化,次要终点包括肾钠排泄率和体重的变化。起始剂量为 30 纳克/千克/分钟,后来出于安全考虑降至 20 纳克/千克/分钟:结果:与研究假设相反,与基线水平相比,乌拉利肽治疗 24 小时后的平均尿量有所减少(22.8 对 47.5 毫升/小时,P=0.04),随机接受乌拉利肽治疗的参与者的尿量减少幅度大于安慰剂(24.7 对 -6.2 毫升/小时,P=0.05)。乌拉利肽没有增加肾钠排泄率或减少体重增加。乌拉利肽与安慰剂的不良反应发生率比为8.5(95% CI:2-35,P=0.003)。接受乌拉利肽治疗的参与者出现了严重的血压下降,影响了他们的肾脏反应能力:结论:20-30 纳克/公斤/分钟剂量的乌拉利肽对难治性腹水患者的尿量和肾脏钠排泄率没有益处。与安慰剂相比,随机接受乌拉利肽治疗的患者总体上出现了更多不良反应。EudraCT 编号:2019-002268-28。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
4978
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces is a leading interdisciplinary journal that brings together chemists, engineers, physicists, and biologists to explore the development and utilization of newly-discovered materials and interfacial processes for specific applications. Our journal has experienced remarkable growth since its establishment in 2009, both in terms of the number of articles published and the impact of the research showcased. We are proud to foster a truly global community, with the majority of published articles originating from outside the United States, reflecting the rapid growth of applied research worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信