A health technology assessment of COVID-19 vaccination for Nigerian decision-makers: Identifying stakeholders and pathways to support evidence uptake.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Benjamin S C Uzochukwu, Chinyere Okeke, Faisal Shuaib, Sergio Torres-Rueda, Anna Vassall, Mark Jit, Justice Nonvignon, Adaora C Uzochukwu, Francis Ruiz
{"title":"A health technology assessment of COVID-19 vaccination for Nigerian decision-makers: Identifying stakeholders and pathways to support evidence uptake.","authors":"Benjamin S C Uzochukwu, Chinyere Okeke, Faisal Shuaib, Sergio Torres-Rueda, Anna Vassall, Mark Jit, Justice Nonvignon, Adaora C Uzochukwu, Francis Ruiz","doi":"10.1186/s12961-024-01158-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nigeria commenced rollout of vaccination for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in March 2021 as part of the national public health response to the pandemic. Findings from appropriately contextualized cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA) as part of a wider process involving health technology assessment (HTA) approaches have been important in informing decision-making in this area. In this paper we outline the processes that were followed to identify COVID-19 vaccine stakeholders involved in the selection, approval, funding, procurement and rollout of vaccines in Nigeria, and describe the process routes we identified to support uptake of HTA-related information for evidence-informed policy in Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our approach to engaging with policy-makers and other stakeholders as part of an HTA of COVID vaccination in Nigeria consisted of three steps, namely: (i) informal discussions with key stakeholders; (ii) stakeholder mapping, analysis and engagement; and (iii) communication and dissemination strategies for the HTA-relevant evidence produced. The analysis of the stakeholder mapping uses the power/interest grid framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The informal discussion with key stakeholders generated six initial policy questions. Further discussions with policy-makers yielded three suitable policy questions for analysis: which COVID-19 vaccines should be bought; what is the optimal mode of delivery of these vaccines; and what are the cost and cost-effectiveness of vaccinating people highlighted in Nigeria's phase 2 vaccine rollout prioritized by the government, especially the inclusion of those aged between 18 and 49 years. The stakeholder mapping exercise highlighted the range of organizations and groups within Nigeria that could use the information from this HTA to guide decision-making. These stakeholders included both public/government, private and international organizations The dissemination plan developed included disseminating the full HTA results to key stakeholders; production of policy briefs; and presentation at different national and international conferences and peer-reviewed publications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HTA processes that involve stakeholder engagement will help ensure important policy questions are taken into account when designing any HTA including any underpinning evidence generation. Further guidance about stakeholder engagement throughout HTA is required, especially for those with low interest in vaccine procurement and use.</p>","PeriodicalId":12870,"journal":{"name":"Health Research Policy and Systems","volume":"22 1","pages":"73"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11210088/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Research Policy and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-024-01158-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nigeria commenced rollout of vaccination for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in March 2021 as part of the national public health response to the pandemic. Findings from appropriately contextualized cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA) as part of a wider process involving health technology assessment (HTA) approaches have been important in informing decision-making in this area. In this paper we outline the processes that were followed to identify COVID-19 vaccine stakeholders involved in the selection, approval, funding, procurement and rollout of vaccines in Nigeria, and describe the process routes we identified to support uptake of HTA-related information for evidence-informed policy in Nigeria.

Methods: Our approach to engaging with policy-makers and other stakeholders as part of an HTA of COVID vaccination in Nigeria consisted of three steps, namely: (i) informal discussions with key stakeholders; (ii) stakeholder mapping, analysis and engagement; and (iii) communication and dissemination strategies for the HTA-relevant evidence produced. The analysis of the stakeholder mapping uses the power/interest grid framework.

Results: The informal discussion with key stakeholders generated six initial policy questions. Further discussions with policy-makers yielded three suitable policy questions for analysis: which COVID-19 vaccines should be bought; what is the optimal mode of delivery of these vaccines; and what are the cost and cost-effectiveness of vaccinating people highlighted in Nigeria's phase 2 vaccine rollout prioritized by the government, especially the inclusion of those aged between 18 and 49 years. The stakeholder mapping exercise highlighted the range of organizations and groups within Nigeria that could use the information from this HTA to guide decision-making. These stakeholders included both public/government, private and international organizations The dissemination plan developed included disseminating the full HTA results to key stakeholders; production of policy briefs; and presentation at different national and international conferences and peer-reviewed publications.

Conclusions: HTA processes that involve stakeholder engagement will help ensure important policy questions are taken into account when designing any HTA including any underpinning evidence generation. Further guidance about stakeholder engagement throughout HTA is required, especially for those with low interest in vaccine procurement and use.

针对尼日利亚决策者的 COVID-19 疫苗接种卫生技术评估:确定利益相关者和支持证据吸收的途径。
背景:尼日利亚于 2021 年 3 月开始推广 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫苗接种,作为国家公共卫生应对大流行的一部分。作为涉及卫生技术评估 (HTA) 方法的更广泛流程的一部分,适当结合实际情况的成本效益分析 (CEA) 结果对该领域的决策具有重要意义。在本文中,我们概述了为确定参与尼日利亚疫苗选择、批准、资助、采购和推广的 COVID-19 疫苗利益相关者所遵循的流程,并描述了我们为支持尼日利亚吸收 HTA 相关信息以制定循证政策而确定的流程路线:作为尼日利亚 COVID 疫苗接种 HTA 的一部分,我们与政策制定者和其他利益相关者接触的方法包括三个步骤,即:(i) 与主要利益相关者进行非正式讨论;(ii) 利益相关者摸底、分析和接触;(iii) 针对所产生的 HTA 相关证据制定沟通和传播策略。对利益相关者图谱的分析采用了权力/利益网格框架:与主要利益相关者的非正式讨论产生了六个初步的政策问题。与政策制定者的进一步讨论产生了三个适合分析的政策问题:应该购买哪些 COVID-19 疫苗;这些疫苗的最佳接种模式是什么;在尼日利亚政府优先考虑的第二阶段疫苗推广中,为重点人群接种疫苗的成本和成本效益如何,尤其是将 18 至 49 岁的人群纳入其中。利益相关者摸底工作强调了尼日利亚国内可利用该 HTA 信息指导决策的组织和团体的范围。所制定的传播计划包括:向主要利益相关者传播 HTA 的全部结果;编写政策简报;在不同的国内和国际会议上进行介绍,以及发表同行评审出版物:涉及利益相关者参与的 HTA 流程将有助于确保在设计任何 HTA(包括任何基础证据的生成)时考虑到重要的政策问题。需要进一步指导利益相关者参与整个 HTA 过程,尤其是那些对疫苗采购和使用兴趣不大的利益相关者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Research Policy and Systems
Health Research Policy and Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Research Policy and Systems is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that aims to provide a platform for the global research community to share their views, findings, insights and successes. Health Research Policy and Systems considers manuscripts that investigate the role of evidence-based health policy and health research systems in ensuring the efficient utilization and application of knowledge to improve health and health equity, especially in developing countries. Research is the foundation for improvements in public health. The problem is that people involved in different areas of research, together with managers and administrators in charge of research entities, do not communicate sufficiently with each other.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信