Engagement of medication users in the development and implementation of digital medication adherence technologies: a multi-stakeholder study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Dalma Hosszú, Alexandra L Dima, Francisca Leiva Fernández, Marie Paule Schneider, Liset van Dijk, Krisztina Tóth, Mark Duman, Wendy Davis, Cristian Andriciuc, Rebecca Egan, Bernard Vrijens, Przemyslaw Kardas, Noemi Bitterman, Iva Mucalo, Cristina Mihaela Ghiciuc, Tamás Ágh
{"title":"Engagement of medication users in the development and implementation of digital medication adherence technologies: a multi-stakeholder study.","authors":"Dalma Hosszú, Alexandra L Dima, Francisca Leiva Fernández, Marie Paule Schneider, Liset van Dijk, Krisztina Tóth, Mark Duman, Wendy Davis, Cristian Andriciuc, Rebecca Egan, Bernard Vrijens, Przemyslaw Kardas, Noemi Bitterman, Iva Mucalo, Cristina Mihaela Ghiciuc, Tamás Ágh","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2024.2373184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to create a comprehensive framework for the development and implementation of digital medication adherence technologies (DMATech), focusing on critical stages where engagement of medication users (MU) is considered meaningful, i.e. adds significant value, as agreed upon by participating stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Through a literature review and expert consensus, a framework was outlined covering key DMATech development and implementation phases and steps. An in-person workshop with MU representatives and adherence experts, using the Nominal Group Technique, further refined these stages for MU engagement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DMATech framework included three phases: 'Innovation,' 'Research and Development,' and 'Launch and Implementation,' each encompassing multiple steps. The workshop, attended by five MU representatives and nine adherence experts, identified critical stages for MU input including context analysis, ideation, proof of concept, prototype creation, DMATech's iteration, critical evaluation, healthcare implementation, real-world assessment, and improvement. Nevertheless, there was a divergence of consensus regarding the importance of MUs engagement in regulatory, financial, and marketing aspects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides a holistic framework for DMATech development and implementation and underscores the necessity of MU engagement at various stages. Modes of MU engagement cannot be generalized; a case-by-case evaluation of engagement strategies is essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2024.2373184","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aims to create a comprehensive framework for the development and implementation of digital medication adherence technologies (DMATech), focusing on critical stages where engagement of medication users (MU) is considered meaningful, i.e. adds significant value, as agreed upon by participating stakeholders.

Methods: Through a literature review and expert consensus, a framework was outlined covering key DMATech development and implementation phases and steps. An in-person workshop with MU representatives and adherence experts, using the Nominal Group Technique, further refined these stages for MU engagement.

Results: The DMATech framework included three phases: 'Innovation,' 'Research and Development,' and 'Launch and Implementation,' each encompassing multiple steps. The workshop, attended by five MU representatives and nine adherence experts, identified critical stages for MU input including context analysis, ideation, proof of concept, prototype creation, DMATech's iteration, critical evaluation, healthcare implementation, real-world assessment, and improvement. Nevertheless, there was a divergence of consensus regarding the importance of MUs engagement in regulatory, financial, and marketing aspects.

Conclusions: This study provides a holistic framework for DMATech development and implementation and underscores the necessity of MU engagement at various stages. Modes of MU engagement cannot be generalized; a case-by-case evaluation of engagement strategies is essential.

让用药者参与数字用药依从性技术的开发和实施:一项多方利益相关者研究。
背景:本研究旨在为数字用药依从性技术(DMATech)的开发和实施创建一个综合框架,重点关注参与的利益相关者一致认为药物使用者(MU)的参与有意义(即增加重大价值)的关键阶段:方法:通过文献综述和专家共识,概述了一个涵盖 DMATech 关键开发和实施阶段及步骤的框架。与医疗联盟(MU)代表和坚持治疗专家一起,利用 "名义小组技术"(Nominal Group Technique)召开了一次现场研讨会,进一步完善了这些阶段,以便医疗联盟参与其中:DMATech 框架包括三个阶段:"创新"、"研发 "和 "启动与实施",每个阶段都包含多个步骤。五位医疗联盟代表和九位坚持治疗专家参加了此次研讨会,并确定了医疗联盟参与的关键阶段,包括背景分析、构思、概念验证、原型创建、DMATech 迭代、关键评估、医疗保健实施、真实世界评估和改进。然而,对于医疗单位在监管、财务和营销方面参与的重要性,存在不同的共识:本研究为 DMATech 的开发和实施提供了一个整体框架,并强调了医疗单位在各个阶段参与的必要性。医疗单位的参与模式不能一概而论,必须对参与策略进行个案评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (ISSN 1473-7167) provides expert reviews on cost-benefit and pharmacoeconomic issues relating to the clinical use of drugs and therapeutic approaches. Coverage includes pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life research, therapeutic outcomes, evidence-based medicine and cost-benefit research. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review. The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections: Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信