Impact of Early Depressive Burden on Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Clinical Spine Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-27 DOI:10.1097/BSD.0000000000001653
Jacob C Wolf, Fatima N Anwar, Andrea M Roca, Alexandra C Loya, Srinath S Medakkar, Aayush Kaul, Ishan Khosla, Timothy J Hartman, James W Nie, Keith R MacGregor, Omolabake O Oyetayo, Eileen Zheng, Vincent P Federico, Arash J Sayari, Gregory D Lopez, Kern Singh
{"title":"Impact of Early Depressive Burden on Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.","authors":"Jacob C Wolf, Fatima N Anwar, Andrea M Roca, Alexandra C Loya, Srinath S Medakkar, Aayush Kaul, Ishan Khosla, Timothy J Hartman, James W Nie, Keith R MacGregor, Omolabake O Oyetayo, Eileen Zheng, Vincent P Federico, Arash J Sayari, Gregory D Lopez, Kern Singh","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective review.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate mental health influence on minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) patients.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Poor mental health has been postulated to indicate inferior patient perceptions of surgical outcomes in spine literature. Few studies have assessed mental health as a dynamic metric throughout the perioperative period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-surgeon database was retrospectively searched for patients who underwent primary, elective MIS-TLIF for degenerative or isthmic spondylolisthesis. Summative depressive burden (SDB) was defined by the sum of preoperative and 6-week postoperative 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), with Lesser Burden (LB, SDB<10) and Greater Burden (GB, SDB≥10) cohorts. Patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) were compared preoperatively, at 6 weeks, and at final postoperative follow-up (11.4±10.9 mo), using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), Oswestry disability index (ODI), visual analog scale-back (VAS-B), VAS-leg (VAS-L), and PHQ-9. Improvements at 6-week (∆PROM-6W), final follow-up (∆PROM-FF), and minimum clinically important difference (MCID) achievement were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The GB cohort consisted of 44 of 105 patients. Demographic variations included older age, higher Charlson comorbidity index, increased hypertension prevalence, and private insurance in the LB cohort ( P ≤0.018). The LB cohort demonstrated better baseline and 6-week PROMIS-PF/ODI/VAS-L ( P ≤0.032) and better final PROMIS-PF/ODI/VAS-L/PHQ-9 ( P ≤0.031). Both cohorts improved in all PROMs at 6 weeks and final follow-up ( P ≤0.029), except for PROMIS-PF at 6 weeks in the GB cohort. ∆PROM-6W, ∆PROM-FF, and MCID achievement rate for PHQ-9 were greater in the GB cohort ( P ≤0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>On average, patients undergoing MIS-TLIF for degenerative or isthmic spondylolisthesis improved in all PROMs by final follow-up. Patients with GB suffered inferior perceptions of physical function, disability, and leg pain. MCID rates in mental health were higher for GB cohort. Surgeons are encouraged to adopt a compassionate understanding of depressive burden and educate the patient on possible consequential postoperative outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"51-57"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001653","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective review.

Objective: To evaluate mental health influence on minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) patients.

Summary of background data: Poor mental health has been postulated to indicate inferior patient perceptions of surgical outcomes in spine literature. Few studies have assessed mental health as a dynamic metric throughout the perioperative period.

Methods: A single-surgeon database was retrospectively searched for patients who underwent primary, elective MIS-TLIF for degenerative or isthmic spondylolisthesis. Summative depressive burden (SDB) was defined by the sum of preoperative and 6-week postoperative 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), with Lesser Burden (LB, SDB<10) and Greater Burden (GB, SDB≥10) cohorts. Patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) were compared preoperatively, at 6 weeks, and at final postoperative follow-up (11.4±10.9 mo), using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), Oswestry disability index (ODI), visual analog scale-back (VAS-B), VAS-leg (VAS-L), and PHQ-9. Improvements at 6-week (∆PROM-6W), final follow-up (∆PROM-FF), and minimum clinically important difference (MCID) achievement were compared.

Results: The GB cohort consisted of 44 of 105 patients. Demographic variations included older age, higher Charlson comorbidity index, increased hypertension prevalence, and private insurance in the LB cohort ( P ≤0.018). The LB cohort demonstrated better baseline and 6-week PROMIS-PF/ODI/VAS-L ( P ≤0.032) and better final PROMIS-PF/ODI/VAS-L/PHQ-9 ( P ≤0.031). Both cohorts improved in all PROMs at 6 weeks and final follow-up ( P ≤0.029), except for PROMIS-PF at 6 weeks in the GB cohort. ∆PROM-6W, ∆PROM-FF, and MCID achievement rate for PHQ-9 were greater in the GB cohort ( P ≤0.001).

Conclusion: On average, patients undergoing MIS-TLIF for degenerative or isthmic spondylolisthesis improved in all PROMs by final follow-up. Patients with GB suffered inferior perceptions of physical function, disability, and leg pain. MCID rates in mental health were higher for GB cohort. Surgeons are encouraged to adopt a compassionate understanding of depressive burden and educate the patient on possible consequential postoperative outcomes.

微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体融合术后早期抑郁负担对患者报告结果的影响
研究设计目的:评估心理健康对微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体融合术(MIS-TLIF)患者的影响:评估心理健康对微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(MIS-TLIF)患者的影响:在脊柱文献中,心理健康状况不佳被推测为患者对手术结果的感知较差。很少有研究将心理健康作为整个围手术期的动态指标进行评估:方法:对单个外科医生数据库中因退行性或峡部脊柱滑脱症而接受初级、选择性 MIS-TLIF 手术的患者进行回顾性检索。总的抑郁负担(SDB)由术前和术后 6 周的 9 项患者健康问卷(PHQ-9)之和定义,较轻负担(LB,SDBResults):在 105 名患者中,GB 组群有 44 名患者。人口统计学差异包括年龄较大、Charlson合并症指数较高、高血压患病率较高,以及LB队列中有私人保险(P≤0.018)。浐灞队列的基线和 6 周 PROMIS-PF/ODI/VAS-L 更好(P≤0.032),最终 PROMIS-PF/ODI/VAS-L/PHQ-9 更好(P≤0.031)。两组患者在6周和最终随访时的所有PROM均有所改善(P≤0.029),但GB组在6周时的PROMIS-PF除外。国标组的∆PROM-6W、∆PROM-FF和PHQ-9的MCID达标率更高(P≤0.001):结论:平均而言,因退行性或峡部脊柱滑脱而接受MIS-TLIF手术的患者在最终随访时所有PROM指标均有所改善。GB患者对身体功能、残疾和腿痛的感知较差。GB组患者在心理健康方面的MCID率较高。我们鼓励外科医生以同情的态度理解患者的抑郁负担,并让患者了解术后可能出现的后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Spine Surgery
Clinical Spine Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
236
期刊介绍: Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure. Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信