The use of prone position ventilation in Danish patients with COVID-19-induced severe acute respiratory distress syndrome treated with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A nationwide cohort study with focus on pulmonary effects.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-26 DOI:10.1111/aas.14481
Vibeke Lind Jørgensen, Janne Adelsten, Steffen Christensen, Dorthe Viemose Nielsen, Camilla Tofte Eschen, Hasse Møller Sørensen, Marc Sørensen, Søren Aalbæk Madsen, Jakob Gjedsted, Finn Møller Pedersen, Jonas Nielsen, Lars Grønlykke
{"title":"The use of prone position ventilation in Danish patients with COVID-19-induced severe acute respiratory distress syndrome treated with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A nationwide cohort study with focus on pulmonary effects.","authors":"Vibeke Lind Jørgensen, Janne Adelsten, Steffen Christensen, Dorthe Viemose Nielsen, Camilla Tofte Eschen, Hasse Møller Sørensen, Marc Sørensen, Søren Aalbæk Madsen, Jakob Gjedsted, Finn Møller Pedersen, Jonas Nielsen, Lars Grønlykke","doi":"10.1111/aas.14481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prone position ventilation (PPV) is recommended for patients with COVID-19 induced severe Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) and is used for patients supported with V-V ECMO as well. The purpose of this study was to describe the use of PPV in these patients focusing on physiological effects with the hypothesis that PPV could reduce oxygen need and improve dynamic compliance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a nationwide retrospective analysis of all COVID-19 patients in Denmark from March 2020 - December 2021 with severe ARDS and need of V-V ECMO support. Data on the number of patients treated with PPV, number of PPV sessions, timing, the time spent in prone position, pulmonary physiological response types with analysis of variables affecting the response are reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 68 patients 44 were treated with 220 PPV sessions and a positive clinical response was observed in 80% of patients but only in 45% of sessions. On a single session level, increased compliance was observed in 38% and increased oxygenation in only 15% of 220 sessions, with within-patient heterogeneity. Higher dynamic compliance at the beginning of a PPV session was associated with a lower delta change in dynamic compliance during PPV. The response to a PPV session could not be predicted by the response in the prior session. Dynamic compliance did not change during the ECMO course.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Eighty percent of patients responded positively during a PPV session, but this was not associated with overall pulmonary improvement. On a single patient level, responses were heterogenous and only 45% of sessions resulted in clinical improvement. Response in dynamic compliance was associated with starting values of compliance.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":"1223-1233"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14481","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prone position ventilation (PPV) is recommended for patients with COVID-19 induced severe Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) and is used for patients supported with V-V ECMO as well. The purpose of this study was to describe the use of PPV in these patients focusing on physiological effects with the hypothesis that PPV could reduce oxygen need and improve dynamic compliance.

Methods: This study was a nationwide retrospective analysis of all COVID-19 patients in Denmark from March 2020 - December 2021 with severe ARDS and need of V-V ECMO support. Data on the number of patients treated with PPV, number of PPV sessions, timing, the time spent in prone position, pulmonary physiological response types with analysis of variables affecting the response are reported.

Results: Out of 68 patients 44 were treated with 220 PPV sessions and a positive clinical response was observed in 80% of patients but only in 45% of sessions. On a single session level, increased compliance was observed in 38% and increased oxygenation in only 15% of 220 sessions, with within-patient heterogeneity. Higher dynamic compliance at the beginning of a PPV session was associated with a lower delta change in dynamic compliance during PPV. The response to a PPV session could not be predicted by the response in the prior session. Dynamic compliance did not change during the ECMO course.

Conclusion: Eighty percent of patients responded positively during a PPV session, but this was not associated with overall pulmonary improvement. On a single patient level, responses were heterogenous and only 45% of sessions resulted in clinical improvement. Response in dynamic compliance was associated with starting values of compliance.

丹麦 COVID-19 引起的严重急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者接受静脉体外膜氧合治疗时使用俯卧位通气:一项全国性队列研究,重点关注肺部影响。
背景:COVID-19诱导的严重成人呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者推荐使用俯卧位通气(PPV),使用V-V ECMO支持的患者也推荐使用俯卧位通气。本研究的目的是描述 PPV 在这些患者中的使用情况,重点关注其生理效应,假设 PPV 可以减少氧气需求并改善动态顺应性:本研究对 2020 年 3 月至 2021 年 12 月期间丹麦所有 COVID-19 患者进行了全国范围的回顾性分析,这些患者均患有严重 ARDS 并需要 V-V ECMO 支持。报告了接受 PPV 治疗的患者人数、PPV 治疗次数、时间、俯卧位时间、肺部生理反应类型以及影响反应的变量分析等数据:在 68 名患者中,44 人接受了 220 次 PPV 治疗,80% 的患者观察到了积极的临床反应,但只有 45% 的患者接受了治疗。就单次治疗而言,在 220 次治疗中,38% 的患者顺应性得到提高,只有 15%的患者氧合率得到提高,而且患者之间存在差异。PPV疗程开始时的动态顺应性较高,而PPV期间动态顺应性的δ值变化较低。PPV疗程的反应不能通过前一疗程的反应来预测。动态顺应性在 ECMO 过程中没有变化:结论:80% 的患者在 PPV 过程中反应积极,但这与整体肺功能改善无关。就单个患者而言,反应各不相同,只有 45% 的疗程能改善临床症状。动态顺应性的反应与顺应性的起始值有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信