A Cross-Sectional Study of Gender-Specific Influences of Orthopedic Subspecialty Selection.

The Iowa orthopaedic journal Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Katelyn T Koschmeder, Amelia C Hurley-Novatny, Alex A Marti, Kathryn M Sharp, Shannon E Linderman, Alex R Coffman, Catherine R Olinger
{"title":"A Cross-Sectional Study of Gender-Specific Influences of Orthopedic Subspecialty Selection.","authors":"Katelyn T Koschmeder, Amelia C Hurley-Novatny, Alex A Marti, Kathryn M Sharp, Shannon E Linderman, Alex R Coffman, Catherine R Olinger","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Per the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 6.5% of practicing orthopedic surgeons are female and a majority subspecialize in pediatrics, hand, and foot and ankle surgery. The study purpose is to evaluate influences of orthopedic subspecialty selection, specifically factors such as perceived strength, lifestyle, and mentorship influence on subspecialty decisions and to identify if gender plays a role in these perceptions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An IRB approved cross-sectional study was conducted via email distribution of a REDCap<sup>TM</sup> survey to U.S. licensed orthopedic surgeons. Data regarding demographics, professional degree, training and current practice location, and perceptions regarding orthopedic surgery was obtained using Likert rating scales. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics with two-tailed student's t-tests (α=0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey yielded 282 responses (182 females and 100 males). Overall, the distribution of residents (28%), fellows (6%), and attendings (66%) correlates well with the prevalence of each respective physician category in the field of orthopedic surgery. The study demonstrated no difference in subspecialty choice based on mentorship, work-life-balance, career advancement, subspecialty culture, salary potential, family planning, or schedule. However, a statistically significant difference exists regarding stereotypes, perceived strength required, and perception of discrimination from pursuing a specific orthopedic subspecialty. 27% of females and 10% of males reported discouragement from any subspecialty (p<0.05). Adult reconstructive and oncology were most frequently discouraged. Women reported not choosing a subspecialty because of perceived physical demands more often than men (p<0.001). Women reported an increased use of adaptive strategies in the operating room (p<0.001). Women were also more likely to report feeling discouraged from pursuing a subspecialty due to their gender (p<0.001). Both men and women reported mentorship as the most influential factor in subspecialty selection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Women and men reported different factors were important in their decision of subspecialty. Women were more likely to be discouraged from a subspecialty and experience discrimination based on their perceived strength compared to male peers. Residents, fellows, and attending surgeons valued mentorship as the most influential in their subspeciality choice. This study suggests intrinsic and extrinsic influences that may differentially affect male and female orthopedic surgeons when they choose a subspecialty. <b>Level of Evidence: III</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":94233,"journal":{"name":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","volume":"44 1","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11195877/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Per the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 6.5% of practicing orthopedic surgeons are female and a majority subspecialize in pediatrics, hand, and foot and ankle surgery. The study purpose is to evaluate influences of orthopedic subspecialty selection, specifically factors such as perceived strength, lifestyle, and mentorship influence on subspecialty decisions and to identify if gender plays a role in these perceptions.

Methods: An IRB approved cross-sectional study was conducted via email distribution of a REDCapTM survey to U.S. licensed orthopedic surgeons. Data regarding demographics, professional degree, training and current practice location, and perceptions regarding orthopedic surgery was obtained using Likert rating scales. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics with two-tailed student's t-tests (α=0.05).

Results: The survey yielded 282 responses (182 females and 100 males). Overall, the distribution of residents (28%), fellows (6%), and attendings (66%) correlates well with the prevalence of each respective physician category in the field of orthopedic surgery. The study demonstrated no difference in subspecialty choice based on mentorship, work-life-balance, career advancement, subspecialty culture, salary potential, family planning, or schedule. However, a statistically significant difference exists regarding stereotypes, perceived strength required, and perception of discrimination from pursuing a specific orthopedic subspecialty. 27% of females and 10% of males reported discouragement from any subspecialty (p<0.05). Adult reconstructive and oncology were most frequently discouraged. Women reported not choosing a subspecialty because of perceived physical demands more often than men (p<0.001). Women reported an increased use of adaptive strategies in the operating room (p<0.001). Women were also more likely to report feeling discouraged from pursuing a subspecialty due to their gender (p<0.001). Both men and women reported mentorship as the most influential factor in subspecialty selection.

Conclusion: Women and men reported different factors were important in their decision of subspecialty. Women were more likely to be discouraged from a subspecialty and experience discrimination based on their perceived strength compared to male peers. Residents, fellows, and attending surgeons valued mentorship as the most influential in their subspeciality choice. This study suggests intrinsic and extrinsic influences that may differentially affect male and female orthopedic surgeons when they choose a subspecialty. Level of Evidence: III.

关于骨科亚专科选择中性别特定影响因素的横断面研究。
背景:根据美国矫形外科医师学会的统计,6.5%的执业矫形外科医师为女性,其中大部分人从事儿科、手部、足踝外科等亚专业。研究目的是评估骨科亚专科选择的影响因素,特别是感知强度、生活方式和导师对亚专科决定的影响等因素,并确定性别是否在这些感知中发挥作用:通过向美国持证骨科外科医生发送 REDCapTM 调查问卷的电子邮件,进行了一项经 IRB 批准的横断面研究。采用李克特评分量表获得了有关人口统计学、专业学位、培训和当前执业地点以及对骨科手术看法的数据。数据分析采用描述性统计和双尾学生 t 检验(α=0.05):调查共收到 282 份回复(女性 182 份,男性 100 份)。总体而言,住院医师(28%)、研究员(6%)和主治医师(66%)的分布情况与骨科手术领域各医师类别的流行率密切相关。研究表明,在导师指导、工作与生活平衡、职业发展、亚专科文化、薪酬潜力、计划生育或时间安排等方面,亚专科选择没有差异。然而,在陈规定型观念、所需实力感知和追求特定骨科亚专科的歧视感知方面,存在着统计学意义上的显著差异。27%的女性和10%的男性表示对任何亚专科望而却步(p结论:女性和男性报告称,不同的因素对他们选择亚专科很重要。与男性同龄人相比,女性更有可能对某个亚专科望而却步,也更有可能因为她们认为自己的实力而受到歧视。住院医师、研究员和主治医师认为导师的指导对他们选择亚专科的影响最大。这项研究表明,内在和外在的影响因素可能会在骨科医生选择亚专科时对男性和女性产生不同的影响。证据等级:III.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信