Pain Management for Periacetabular Osteotomy: A Systematic Review.

The Iowa orthopaedic journal Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Kyle P O'Connor, John C Davidson, Jeffrey J Nepple, John C Clohisy, Michael C Willey
{"title":"Pain Management for Periacetabular Osteotomy: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Kyle P O'Connor, John C Davidson, Jeffrey J Nepple, John C Clohisy, Michael C Willey","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early post-operative pain control is essential to facilitate rapid recovery after orthopaedic surgery. Despite periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) being the gold standard treatment of prearthritic hip dysplasia, there is limited evidence assessing efficacy of early post-operative pain management strategies. Recent literature has focused on non-opioid supplemental treatments such as nerve blocks or local wound infiltration. The purpose of this systematic review was to assess efficacy of these interventions to reduce pain, facilitate mobilization, reduce length of stay after PAO surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was created under the guidance of PRISMA from databases that included PubMed, OVID Medline, Embase, SCOPUS, Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials, and clinicaltrials.gov from their creation dates to 12/21/23. These studies were screen based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of six studies were included in this analysis from independent institutions. Three investigated nerve blocks (fascia iliaca, pericapsular, transversus abdominis), one investigated local wound infiltration with ropivacaine, one investigated high-dose dexamethasone, and the last investigated removal of the epidural catheter on postoperative (POD) 1 compared to POD 2. There were heterogeneous outcomes that were measured from these studies. In general, nerve blocks decreased opioid use, pain, and length of hospital stay. The local wound infiltration decreased pain on POD 3 and 4. Removing the epidural catheter on POD1 compared to POD 2 decreased pain and length of stay. High-dose dexamethasone use decreased opioid use on POD 1, otherwise, there was no difference in pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In summary, supplemental pain management strategies peri-operatively for PAO surgery can decrease pain, opioid use, and length of hospital stay, though there are few studies assessing these interventions. Limiting opioid use after surgery reduces known negative consequences of the medication and facilitates rapid recovery. Clinical trials are needed that assess efficacy of supplemental pain management strategies after PAO surgery. <b>Level of Evidence: II</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":94233,"journal":{"name":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","volume":"44 1","pages":"125-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11195880/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early post-operative pain control is essential to facilitate rapid recovery after orthopaedic surgery. Despite periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) being the gold standard treatment of prearthritic hip dysplasia, there is limited evidence assessing efficacy of early post-operative pain management strategies. Recent literature has focused on non-opioid supplemental treatments such as nerve blocks or local wound infiltration. The purpose of this systematic review was to assess efficacy of these interventions to reduce pain, facilitate mobilization, reduce length of stay after PAO surgery.

Methods: A systematic review was created under the guidance of PRISMA from databases that included PubMed, OVID Medline, Embase, SCOPUS, Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials, and clinicaltrials.gov from their creation dates to 12/21/23. These studies were screen based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Results: A total of six studies were included in this analysis from independent institutions. Three investigated nerve blocks (fascia iliaca, pericapsular, transversus abdominis), one investigated local wound infiltration with ropivacaine, one investigated high-dose dexamethasone, and the last investigated removal of the epidural catheter on postoperative (POD) 1 compared to POD 2. There were heterogeneous outcomes that were measured from these studies. In general, nerve blocks decreased opioid use, pain, and length of hospital stay. The local wound infiltration decreased pain on POD 3 and 4. Removing the epidural catheter on POD1 compared to POD 2 decreased pain and length of stay. High-dose dexamethasone use decreased opioid use on POD 1, otherwise, there was no difference in pain.

Conclusion: In summary, supplemental pain management strategies peri-operatively for PAO surgery can decrease pain, opioid use, and length of hospital stay, though there are few studies assessing these interventions. Limiting opioid use after surgery reduces known negative consequences of the medication and facilitates rapid recovery. Clinical trials are needed that assess efficacy of supplemental pain management strategies after PAO surgery. Level of Evidence: II.

髋臼周围截骨术的疼痛治疗:系统回顾
背景:术后早期疼痛控制对于促进骨科手术后的快速康复至关重要。尽管髋关节周围截骨术(PAO)是治疗关节炎前髋关节发育不良的金标准疗法,但评估术后早期疼痛控制策略疗效的证据却很有限。最近的文献主要关注非阿片类药物的辅助治疗,如神经阻滞或局部伤口浸润。本系统性综述旨在评估这些干预措施在 PAO 术后减轻疼痛、促进活动、缩短住院时间方面的疗效:在 PRISMA 的指导下,从 PubMed、OVID Medline、Embase、SCOPUS、Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials 和 clinicaltrials.gov 等数据库中创建了一篇系统性综述。这些研究是根据预先确定的纳入和排除标准进行筛选的:共有六项来自独立机构的研究被纳入本次分析。其中三项研究了神经阻滞(髂筋膜、筋膜周围、腹横肌),一项研究了罗哌卡因局部伤口浸润,一项研究了大剂量地塞米松,最后一项研究了术后(POD)1与POD 2硬膜外导管拔除的比较。这些研究得出的结果不尽相同。总的来说,神经阻滞减少了阿片类药物的使用、疼痛和住院时间。局部伤口浸润可减少 POD 3 和 4 的疼痛。与 POD 2 相比,在 POD 1 拔除硬膜外导管可减少疼痛和住院时间。大剂量地塞米松的使用减少了 POD 1 的阿片类药物用量,除此之外,疼痛方面没有差异:总之,PAO 手术围手术期的辅助止痛策略可减少疼痛、阿片类药物的使用和住院时间,但评估这些干预措施的研究很少。术后限制阿片类药物的使用可减少药物的已知不良后果,并促进快速康复。需要进行临床试验,评估 PAO 术后辅助疼痛管理策略的疗效。证据等级:II.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信