Proactive patient safety: enhancing hospital readiness through simulation-based clinical systems testing and healthcare failure mode and effect analysis.

IF 2.8 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Tarek Hazwani, Heba Hamam, Angela Caswell, Azza Madkhaly, Saif Al Saif, Zahra Al Hassan, Reem Al Sweilem, Asma Arabi
{"title":"Proactive patient safety: enhancing hospital readiness through simulation-based clinical systems testing and healthcare failure mode and effect analysis.","authors":"Tarek Hazwani, Heba Hamam, Angela Caswell, Azza Madkhaly, Saif Al Saif, Zahra Al Hassan, Reem Al Sweilem, Asma Arabi","doi":"10.1186/s41077-024-00298-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recognizing and identifying latent safety threats (LSTs) before patient care commences is crucial, aiding leaders in ensuring hospital readiness and extending its impact beyond patient safety alone. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a combination of Simulation-based Clinical Systems Testing (SbCST) with Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (HFMEA) with regard to mitigating LSTs within a newly constructed hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three phases of the combined SbCST and HFMEA approach were implemented across all hospital settings. The scenarios tested system functionalities, team responses, and resource availability. The threats thus identified were categorized into system-related issues, human issues, and resource issues, after which they were prioritized and addressed using mitigation strategies. Reassessment confirmed the effectiveness of these strategies before hospital commissioning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>More than 76% of the LSTs were mitigated through the combined approach. System-related issues, such as nonfunctional communication devices and faulty elevators, were addressed by leadership. Human issues such as miscommunication and nonadherence to hospital policy led to improvements in interprofessional communication and teamwork. Resource issues, including missing equipment and risks of oxygen explosion, were addressed through procurement, maintenance, and staff training for equipment preparation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SbCST and HFMEA were highly effective with regard to proactively identifying and mitigating LSTs across all aspects of hospital preparedness. This systematic and comprehensive approach offers a valuable tool for enhancing patient safety in new healthcare facilities, thereby potentially setting a new standard for proactive hazard identification and risk management in the context of healthcare construction and commissioning.</p>","PeriodicalId":72108,"journal":{"name":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","volume":"9 1","pages":"26"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11202391/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-024-00298-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recognizing and identifying latent safety threats (LSTs) before patient care commences is crucial, aiding leaders in ensuring hospital readiness and extending its impact beyond patient safety alone. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a combination of Simulation-based Clinical Systems Testing (SbCST) with Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (HFMEA) with regard to mitigating LSTs within a newly constructed hospital.

Methods: Three phases of the combined SbCST and HFMEA approach were implemented across all hospital settings. The scenarios tested system functionalities, team responses, and resource availability. The threats thus identified were categorized into system-related issues, human issues, and resource issues, after which they were prioritized and addressed using mitigation strategies. Reassessment confirmed the effectiveness of these strategies before hospital commissioning.

Results: More than 76% of the LSTs were mitigated through the combined approach. System-related issues, such as nonfunctional communication devices and faulty elevators, were addressed by leadership. Human issues such as miscommunication and nonadherence to hospital policy led to improvements in interprofessional communication and teamwork. Resource issues, including missing equipment and risks of oxygen explosion, were addressed through procurement, maintenance, and staff training for equipment preparation.

Conclusion: The SbCST and HFMEA were highly effective with regard to proactively identifying and mitigating LSTs across all aspects of hospital preparedness. This systematic and comprehensive approach offers a valuable tool for enhancing patient safety in new healthcare facilities, thereby potentially setting a new standard for proactive hazard identification and risk management in the context of healthcare construction and commissioning.

积极主动的患者安全:通过基于模拟的临床系统测试和医疗失效模式及影响分析,加强医院的准备工作。
背景:在患者护理开始之前识别和确定潜在的安全威胁(LST)至关重要,这有助于领导者确保医院准备就绪,并将其影响扩大到患者安全之外。本研究评估了基于仿真的临床系统测试(SbCST)与医疗失效模式及影响分析(HFMEA)相结合的方法在减轻新建医院 LST 方面的效果:在所有医院环境中实施了三个阶段的 SbCST 和 HFMEA 组合方法。这些情景测试了系统功能、团队响应和资源可用性。由此确定的威胁被分为系统相关问题、人为问题和资源问题,然后对这些问题进行优先排序,并采用缓解策略加以解决。在医院投入使用前,重新评估确认了这些策略的有效性:超过 76% 的 LST 通过综合方法得到了缓解。与系统相关的问题,如通讯设备失灵和电梯故障,由领导层负责解决。沟通不畅和不遵守医院政策等人为问题则改善了专业间的沟通和团队合作。资源问题,包括设备缺失和氧气爆炸风险,则通过采购、维护和对员工进行设备准备培训来解决:SbCST 和 HFMEA 在医院准备工作的各个方面主动识别和减少 LST 方面都非常有效。这种系统而全面的方法为提高新建医疗设施中的患者安全提供了宝贵的工具,从而有可能为医疗建设和调试中的主动危险识别和风险管理设定新的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信