[Return to Work after Cancer - a Systematic Review of Predictors in Germany].

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-25 DOI:10.1055/a-2300-3524
Clara Breidenbach, Nicole Ernstmann, Sophie Schellack, Marie Degenhardt, Paula Heidkamp, Lina Heier, Kati Hiltrop, Oliver Rick, Johannes Soff, Christoph Kowalski
{"title":"[Return to Work after Cancer - a Systematic Review of Predictors in Germany].","authors":"Clara Breidenbach, Nicole Ernstmann, Sophie Schellack, Marie Degenhardt, Paula Heidkamp, Lina Heier, Kati Hiltrop, Oliver Rick, Johannes Soff, Christoph Kowalski","doi":"10.1055/a-2300-3524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>More than one third of cancer survivors are of working age. Return to work (RTW) with and after cancer treatment is therefore an important issue for this group - but this is often accompanied with many challenges. The aim of this systematic review was to identify predictors of RTW after cancer from the literature specifically for Germany and to place these factors chronologically in the oncological course of treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was performed using PubMed in June 2022. Included were all papers original published in German or English between 2000 and 2022 and referring to a German sample, regardless of study design.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From a total of 8,381 hits in the meta-database, 30 publications were finally considered in the synthesis of results. Higher age, lower education, lower socioeconomic status, higher disease stage, more progressive disease course, more severe side effects of treatment, (more severe) fatigue, higher psychological distress, worse health status, occupational status as a blue collar worker and manual labor, unemployment prior to diagnosis, more negative perceptions of the work(place) environment, and lower intention to work and lower work ability/ subjective prognosis of employability were associated with lower likelihood of RTW after cancer in the literature. Treatment type and use of rehabilitation were also found to be associated with RTW.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Sociodemographic, disease-related, psychosocial, and work-related predictors of RTW after cancer in Germany were identified. The results may help to develop targeted support measures that can be applied in specific phases of treatment. The comparability of the literature on predictors for RTW is limited due to a high heterogeneity in the operationalization of RTW and methodological approaches. There is need for further standardization in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":54504,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2300-3524","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: More than one third of cancer survivors are of working age. Return to work (RTW) with and after cancer treatment is therefore an important issue for this group - but this is often accompanied with many challenges. The aim of this systematic review was to identify predictors of RTW after cancer from the literature specifically for Germany and to place these factors chronologically in the oncological course of treatment.

Methods: A systematic search was performed using PubMed in June 2022. Included were all papers original published in German or English between 2000 and 2022 and referring to a German sample, regardless of study design.

Results: From a total of 8,381 hits in the meta-database, 30 publications were finally considered in the synthesis of results. Higher age, lower education, lower socioeconomic status, higher disease stage, more progressive disease course, more severe side effects of treatment, (more severe) fatigue, higher psychological distress, worse health status, occupational status as a blue collar worker and manual labor, unemployment prior to diagnosis, more negative perceptions of the work(place) environment, and lower intention to work and lower work ability/ subjective prognosis of employability were associated with lower likelihood of RTW after cancer in the literature. Treatment type and use of rehabilitation were also found to be associated with RTW.

Discussion: Sociodemographic, disease-related, psychosocial, and work-related predictors of RTW after cancer in Germany were identified. The results may help to develop targeted support measures that can be applied in specific phases of treatment. The comparability of the literature on predictors for RTW is limited due to a high heterogeneity in the operationalization of RTW and methodological approaches. There is need for further standardization in this area.

[癌症后重返工作岗位--德国预测因素系统回顾]。
介绍:三分之一以上的癌症幸存者处于工作年龄。因此,癌症治疗后重返工作岗位(RTW)是这一群体面临的重要问题,但这往往伴随着许多挑战。本系统性综述旨在从德国的文献中找出癌症治疗后重返工作岗位的预测因素,并将这些因素按时间顺序排列在肿瘤治疗过程中:方法:2022 年 6 月使用 PubMed 进行了系统性检索。方法:我们在 2022 年 6 月使用 PubMed 进行了一次系统性检索,纳入了 2000 年至 2022 年间以德语或英语发表的所有原始论文,这些论文均涉及德国样本,且不考虑研究设计:结果:在元数据库中总共有 8381 次点击,最终有 30 篇论文被纳入结果综述。在文献中,年龄越大、教育程度越低、社会经济地位越低、疾病分期越高、病程越进展、治疗副作用越严重、疲劳(越严重)、心理压力越大、健康状况越差、职业身份为蓝领工人和体力劳动者、确诊前失业、对工作(场所)环境的负面看法越多、工作意愿越低、工作能力越低/就业能力的主观预后越低,这些因素都与癌症患者术后复工的可能性较低有关。治疗类型和康复的使用也与复工有关:讨论:研究发现了德国癌症患者术后复工的社会人口、疾病相关、社会心理和工作相关预测因素。讨论:研究发现了德国癌症患者的社会人口学、疾病相关、社会心理学和工作相关预测因素,这些结果可能有助于制定可应用于特定治疗阶段的有针对性的支持措施。由于复工的操作方法和方法存在很大的异质性,因此有关复工预测因素的文献的可比性非常有限。该领域需要进一步标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Die Zeitschrift Die Rehabilitation richtet sich an Mitarbeiterinnen und Mitarbeiter in Einrichtungen, Forschungsinstitutionen und Trägern der Rehabilitation. Sie berichtet über die medizinischen, gesetzlichen, politischen und gesellschaftlichen Grundlagen und Rahmenbedingungen der Rehabilitation und über internationale Entwicklungen auf diesem Gebiet. Schwerpunkte sind dabei Beiträge zu Rehabilitationspraxis (medizinische, berufliche und soziale Rehabilitation, Qualitätsmanagement, neue Konzepte und Versorgungsmodelle zur Anwendung der ICF, Bewegungstherapie etc.), Rehabilitationsforschung (praxisrelevante Ergebnisse, Methoden und Assessments, Leitlinienentwicklung, sozialmedizinische Fragen), Public Health, Sozialmedizin Gesundheits-System-Forschung sowie die daraus resultierenden Probleme.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信