Towards Personalized TSH Reference Ranges: A Genetic and Population-Based Approach in Three Independent Cohorts.

IF 5.8 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Thyroid Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-15 DOI:10.1089/thy.2024.0045
Aleksander Kuś, Rosalie B T M Sterenborg, Eirin B Haug, Tessel E Galesloot, W Edward Visser, Johannes W A Smit, Tomasz Bednarczuk, Robin P Peeters, Bjørn O Åsvold, Alexander Teumer, Marco Medici
{"title":"Towards Personalized TSH Reference Ranges: A Genetic and Population-Based Approach in Three Independent Cohorts.","authors":"Aleksander Kuś, Rosalie B T M Sterenborg, Eirin B Haug, Tessel E Galesloot, W Edward Visser, Johannes W A Smit, Tomasz Bednarczuk, Robin P Peeters, Bjørn O Åsvold, Alexander Teumer, Marco Medici","doi":"10.1089/thy.2024.0045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Serum thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) measurement is the diagnostic cornerstone for primary thyroid dysfunction. There is high inter-individual but limited intra-individual variation in TSH concentrations, largely due to genetic factors. The currently used wide population-based reference intervals may lead to inappropriate management decisions. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A polygenic score (PGS) including 59 genetic variants was used to calculate genetically determined TSH reference ranges in a thyroid disease-free cohort (<i>n</i> = 6,834). Its effect on reclassification of diagnoses was investigated when compared to using population-based reference ranges. Next, results were validated in a second independent population-based thyroid disease-free cohort (<i>n</i> = 3,800). Potential clinical implications were assessed in a third independent population-based cohort including individuals without thyroid disease (<i>n</i> = 26,321) as well as individuals on levothyroxine (LT4) treatment (<i>n</i> = 1,132). <b><i>Results:</i></b> PGS was a much stronger predictor of individual TSH concentrations than FT4 (total variance in TSH concentrations explained 9.2-11.1% vs. 2.4-2.7%, respectively) or any other nongenetic factor (total variance in TSH concentrations explained 0.2-1.8%). Genetically determined TSH reference ranges differed significantly between PGS quartiles in all cohorts, while the differences in FT4 concentrations were absent or only minor. Up to 24.7-30.1% of individuals, previously classified as having subclinical hypo- and hyperthyroidism when using population-based TSH reference ranges, were reclassified as euthyroid when genetically determined TSH reference ranges were applied. Individuals in the higher PGS quartiles had a higher probability of being prescribed LT4 treatment compared to individuals from the lower PGS quartiles (3.3% in Q1 vs. 5.2% in Q4, <i>P<sub>for trend</sub></i> =1.7 × 10<sup>-8</sup>). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Individual genetic profiles have the potential to personalize TSH reference ranges, with large effects on reclassification of diagnosis and LT4 prescriptions. As the currently used PGS can only predict approximately 10% of inter-individual variation in TSH concentrations, it should be further improved when more genetic variants determining TSH concentrations are identified in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23016,"journal":{"name":"Thyroid","volume":" ","pages":"969-979"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thyroid","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2024.0045","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Serum thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) measurement is the diagnostic cornerstone for primary thyroid dysfunction. There is high inter-individual but limited intra-individual variation in TSH concentrations, largely due to genetic factors. The currently used wide population-based reference intervals may lead to inappropriate management decisions. Methods: A polygenic score (PGS) including 59 genetic variants was used to calculate genetically determined TSH reference ranges in a thyroid disease-free cohort (n = 6,834). Its effect on reclassification of diagnoses was investigated when compared to using population-based reference ranges. Next, results were validated in a second independent population-based thyroid disease-free cohort (n = 3,800). Potential clinical implications were assessed in a third independent population-based cohort including individuals without thyroid disease (n = 26,321) as well as individuals on levothyroxine (LT4) treatment (n = 1,132). Results: PGS was a much stronger predictor of individual TSH concentrations than FT4 (total variance in TSH concentrations explained 9.2-11.1% vs. 2.4-2.7%, respectively) or any other nongenetic factor (total variance in TSH concentrations explained 0.2-1.8%). Genetically determined TSH reference ranges differed significantly between PGS quartiles in all cohorts, while the differences in FT4 concentrations were absent or only minor. Up to 24.7-30.1% of individuals, previously classified as having subclinical hypo- and hyperthyroidism when using population-based TSH reference ranges, were reclassified as euthyroid when genetically determined TSH reference ranges were applied. Individuals in the higher PGS quartiles had a higher probability of being prescribed LT4 treatment compared to individuals from the lower PGS quartiles (3.3% in Q1 vs. 5.2% in Q4, Pfor trend =1.7 × 10-8). Conclusions: Individual genetic profiles have the potential to personalize TSH reference ranges, with large effects on reclassification of diagnosis and LT4 prescriptions. As the currently used PGS can only predict approximately 10% of inter-individual variation in TSH concentrations, it should be further improved when more genetic variants determining TSH concentrations are identified in future studies.

实现个性化 TSH 参考范围:在三个独立队列中采用基于基因和人群的方法。
背景:血清促甲状腺激素(TSH)测量是诊断原发性甲状腺功能障碍的基石。主要由于遗传因素,促甲状腺激素浓度的个体间差异很大,但个体内差异有限。目前使用的基于人群的广泛参考区间可能会导致不恰当的管理决策:方法:在一个无甲状腺疾病的队列(N=6834)中,使用包括 59 个遗传变异的多基因评分(PGS)来计算由基因决定的 TSH 参考范围。与使用基于人群的参考范围相比,研究了其对诊断重新分类的影响。接着,在第二个独立的无甲状腺疾病人群队列(人数=3800)中对结果进行了验证。第三个独立人群队列包括无甲状腺疾病者(26,321 人)和接受左甲状腺素(LT4)治疗者(1,132 人),对其潜在的临床影响进行了评估:PGS对个体TSH浓度的预测作用远远强于FT4(TSH浓度的总差异解释率分别为9.2%-11.1% vs. 2.4%-2.7%)或任何其他非遗传因素(TSH浓度的总差异解释率为0.2%-1.8%)。在所有队列中,由基因决定的 TSH 参考范围在 PGS 四分位数之间存在显著差异,而 FT4 浓度则不存在差异或差异很小。在使用基于人群的 TSH 参考范围时,之前被归类为亚临床甲状腺功能减退症和甲状腺功能亢进症的患者中,有高达 24.7-30.1% 的人在使用基因决定的 TSH 参考范围时被重新归类为甲状腺功能亢进症。与PGS四分位数较低的个体相比,PGS四分位数较高的个体接受LT4治疗的概率更高(Q1为3.3%,Q4为5.2%,趋势P=1.7x10-8):个人基因图谱具有个性化 TSH 参考范围的潜力,对诊断和 LT4 处方的重新分类有很大影响。由于目前使用的 PGS 只能预测约 10% 的 TSH 浓度个体间差异,因此在未来的研究中发现更多决定 TSH 浓度的基因变异后,应进一步改进 PGS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thyroid
Thyroid 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
195
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: This authoritative journal program, including the monthly flagship journal Thyroid, Clinical Thyroidology® (monthly), and VideoEndocrinology™ (quarterly), delivers in-depth coverage on topics from clinical application and primary care, to the latest advances in diagnostic imaging and surgical techniques and technologies, designed to optimize patient care and outcomes. Thyroid is the leading, peer-reviewed resource for original articles, patient-focused reports, and translational research on thyroid cancer and all thyroid related diseases. The Journal delivers the latest findings on topics from primary care to clinical application, and is the exclusive source for the authoritative and updated American Thyroid Association (ATA) Guidelines for Managing Thyroid Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信