Anesthesia for Endovascular Therapy for Stroke.

IF 3.2 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Arianna Gaspari, Giulia Vaccari, Federica Arturi, Gabriele Melegari, Stefano Baroni
{"title":"Anesthesia for Endovascular Therapy for Stroke.","authors":"Arianna Gaspari, Giulia Vaccari, Federica Arturi, Gabriele Melegari, Stefano Baroni","doi":"10.3390/neurolint16030050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In patients with acute ischemic stroke, the standard of care is to perform intra-arterial endovascular thrombectomy in addition to intravenous thrombolysis. In this study, we investigated the different anesthetic techniques chosen for this procedure and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing endovascular procedures were divided into three groups. The first group consisted of patients who received general anesthesia, the second group underwent the procedure under conscious sedation and local anesthesia at the catheter insertion site, and lastly the third group included patients who received only local anesthesia at the catheter insertion site, without sedation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the endovascular procedure, we did not notice significant differences in vital parameters, in particular the mean blood pressure (MAP) between patients treated with different types of anesthesia. Also, the duration of the revascularization did not show significant differences between the three groups. The main point is the absence of differences in terms of functional and clinical outcomes, using various scores as reference, such as the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at 7 days, NIHSS and Modified Rankin Scale (MRS) at time of discharge, and MRS after 3 months. These scores did not show significant differences in groups treated with different types of anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The rate of success of the revascularization procedure is almost overlapping between patients treated with conscious sedation and general anesthesia. In addition, we did not notice significant differences between groups in terms of functional and clinical outcomes. Considering the possible usefulness of applying conscious sedation, at OCSAE of Baggiovara, an internal protocol for conscious sedation was introduced to standardize the treatment in patients undergoing endovascular procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":19130,"journal":{"name":"Neurology International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11206672/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/neurolint16030050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In patients with acute ischemic stroke, the standard of care is to perform intra-arterial endovascular thrombectomy in addition to intravenous thrombolysis. In this study, we investigated the different anesthetic techniques chosen for this procedure and clinical outcomes.

Methods: Patients undergoing endovascular procedures were divided into three groups. The first group consisted of patients who received general anesthesia, the second group underwent the procedure under conscious sedation and local anesthesia at the catheter insertion site, and lastly the third group included patients who received only local anesthesia at the catheter insertion site, without sedation.

Results: During the endovascular procedure, we did not notice significant differences in vital parameters, in particular the mean blood pressure (MAP) between patients treated with different types of anesthesia. Also, the duration of the revascularization did not show significant differences between the three groups. The main point is the absence of differences in terms of functional and clinical outcomes, using various scores as reference, such as the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at 7 days, NIHSS and Modified Rankin Scale (MRS) at time of discharge, and MRS after 3 months. These scores did not show significant differences in groups treated with different types of anesthesia.

Conclusions: The rate of success of the revascularization procedure is almost overlapping between patients treated with conscious sedation and general anesthesia. In addition, we did not notice significant differences between groups in terms of functional and clinical outcomes. Considering the possible usefulness of applying conscious sedation, at OCSAE of Baggiovara, an internal protocol for conscious sedation was introduced to standardize the treatment in patients undergoing endovascular procedures.

脑卒中血管内治疗的麻醉。
背景:对于急性缺血性卒中患者,除静脉溶栓外,标准的治疗方法是进行动脉内血管内血栓切除术。在这项研究中,我们调查了为这种手术选择的不同麻醉技术和临床结果:方法:接受血管内手术的患者分为三组。第一组是接受全身麻醉的患者,第二组是在有意识镇静和导管插入部位局部麻醉的情况下接受手术的患者,最后一组是仅在导管插入部位接受局部麻醉且不使用镇静剂的患者:在血管内手术过程中,我们没有发现采用不同麻醉方式的患者在生命参数,特别是平均血压(MAP)方面存在明显差异。此外,血管再通的持续时间在三组之间也没有明显差异。最重要的一点是,三组患者在功能和临床结果方面没有差异,以各种评分作为参考,如7天后的美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分、出院时的NIHSS和改良Rankin量表(MRS)评分以及3个月后的MRS评分。这些评分在采用不同麻醉方式治疗的组别中没有明显差异:结论:使用意识镇静和全身麻醉的患者血管再通手术的成功率几乎相同。此外,在功能和临床结果方面,我们也没有发现各组之间存在显著差异。考虑到使用有意识镇静可能会有帮助,巴乔瓦拉的OCSAE引入了有意识镇静的内部规程,以便对接受血管内手术的患者进行标准化治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurology International
Neurology International CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
69
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信