Opportunistic Ultrasound Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

IF 0.6 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Annals of vascular diseases Pub Date : 2024-06-25 Epub Date: 2024-04-10 DOI:10.3400/avd.oa.23-00110
Yasuharu Funamizu, Hitoshi Goto, Ayaka Oda, Takashi Miki, Yoshifumi Saijo
{"title":"Opportunistic Ultrasound Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.","authors":"Yasuharu Funamizu, Hitoshi Goto, Ayaka Oda, Takashi Miki, Yoshifumi Saijo","doi":"10.3400/avd.oa.23-00110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b>: In patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), early detection and optimal elective treatment before rupture are desirable. In the absence of an established public screening system, opportunistic screening during ultrasound examination for another purpose might be efficacious. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of opportunistic screening for AAA. <b>Methods</b>: This prospective multicenter observational study enrolled patients who were scheduled to undergo ultrasound for reasons other than AAA. After the ultrasound for the original purpose, evaluation of the abdominal aorta was added. If the abdominal aorta was clear enough for measurement, its diameter and shape were recorded. Furthermore, information on comorbidities was collected for each patient. <b>Results</b>: A total of 10325 patients (echocardiography: 6150; abdominal ultrasound: 4162) from 16 institutions were enrolled. The abdominal aorta was well visualized in 92.9% of patients who underwent echocardiography. Among 9791 patients, AAA was diagnosed in 122 (1.3%) (107 fusiform and 15 saccular), with a diameter range of 30-63 mm. The diagnostic rate increased with age. On multivariate analysis, older age, male sex, coronary artery disease, peripheral arterial disease, and smoking habituation were the risk factors for AAA. <b>Conclusion</b>: Opportunistic screening for AAA was efficacious.</p>","PeriodicalId":7995,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular diseases","volume":"17 2","pages":"157-163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11196171/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.23-00110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), early detection and optimal elective treatment before rupture are desirable. In the absence of an established public screening system, opportunistic screening during ultrasound examination for another purpose might be efficacious. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of opportunistic screening for AAA. Methods: This prospective multicenter observational study enrolled patients who were scheduled to undergo ultrasound for reasons other than AAA. After the ultrasound for the original purpose, evaluation of the abdominal aorta was added. If the abdominal aorta was clear enough for measurement, its diameter and shape were recorded. Furthermore, information on comorbidities was collected for each patient. Results: A total of 10325 patients (echocardiography: 6150; abdominal ultrasound: 4162) from 16 institutions were enrolled. The abdominal aorta was well visualized in 92.9% of patients who underwent echocardiography. Among 9791 patients, AAA was diagnosed in 122 (1.3%) (107 fusiform and 15 saccular), with a diameter range of 30-63 mm. The diagnostic rate increased with age. On multivariate analysis, older age, male sex, coronary artery disease, peripheral arterial disease, and smoking habituation were the risk factors for AAA. Conclusion: Opportunistic screening for AAA was efficacious.

腹主动脉瘤的机会性超声波筛查。
目的:对于腹主动脉瘤(AAA)患者来说,最好能在动脉瘤破裂前及早发现并进行最佳的选择性治疗。在没有建立公共筛查系统的情况下,出于其他目的在超声波检查时进行机会性筛查可能会有效。本研究旨在评估机会性 AAA 筛查的有效性。方法:这项前瞻性多中心观察研究招募了因 AAA 以外的原因而计划接受超声检查的患者。在为原定目的进行超声检查后,再对腹主动脉进行评估。如果腹主动脉足够清晰,可以进行测量,则记录其直径和形状。此外,还收集了每位患者的合并症信息。结果共有来自 16 家机构的 10325 名患者(超声心动图:6150 人;腹部超声:4162 人)参与了研究。在接受超声心动图检查的患者中,92.9%的患者腹主动脉清晰可见。在 9791 名患者中,有 122 人(1.3%)被诊断为 AAA(107 人呈纺锤形,15 人呈囊状),直径范围为 30-63 毫米。诊断率随年龄增长而增加。经多变量分析,年龄较大、男性、冠状动脉疾病、外周动脉疾病和吸烟习惯是 AAA 的危险因素。结论是对 AAA 进行机会性筛查是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of vascular diseases
Annals of vascular diseases PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信