The Role of Telemedicine in Strabismus Assessment: A Narrative Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Telemedicine and e-Health Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-25 DOI:10.1089/tmj.2024.0115
Dominic S H Wong, Abdulmalik Alsaif, Lloyd Bender
{"title":"The Role of Telemedicine in Strabismus Assessment: A Narrative Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Dominic S H Wong, Abdulmalik Alsaif, Lloyd Bender","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2024.0115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Strabismus is a common ocular condition requiring precise quantification of gaze deviation and qualification of strabismus category. Telemedicine refers to the use of technology to remotely diagnose and treat medical conditions. This narrative review aimed to assess the efficacy of a variety of telemedicine modalities for the assessment of strabismus. A secondary objective was to quantify overall accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of automated methods using meta-analysis of available data. <b>Methods:</b> A literature search was conducted using the Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library data libraries. Keywords, including \"strabismus,\" \"phoria,\" \"telemed*,\" and \"telehealth,\" were used to locate relevant studies, with Medical Subject Headings terms, free text, and synonyms. No year restrictions were applied. Studies not in English were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. <b>Results:</b> Thirty-four studies were included. All outcomes relating to accuracy and reliability of telemedicine versus a reference standard were extracted, as well as qualitative observations. High sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and agreement were consistently shown across studies. Meta-analysis of two subsets featuring automated methods, for which relevant data were available, revealed a pooled accuracy of 0.877 (0.806-0.949), sensitivity of 0.856 (0.805-0.907), and specificity of 0.900 (0.845-0.954). Subcategories \"remote standard assessment,\" \"digital image analysis,\" \"wearable devices,\" \"mobile health (mHealth),\" and \"artificial intelligence\" were independently examined. <b>Conclusions:</b> The majority of systems achieved parity with standard physician assessment, with the added benefit of eliminating subjectivity. Meta-analysis results suggest potential introduction of remote automated assessment where conventional assessment is unavailable, although accuracy of current technologies remains limited compared to in-person examination. Telemedicine modalities described offer convenience for patients, shorter examination times, and the potential to go beyond in-person assessments. The evidence gathered in this review supports the beginning of telemedicine integration into the world of strabismus diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":54434,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine and e-Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine and e-Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2024.0115","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Strabismus is a common ocular condition requiring precise quantification of gaze deviation and qualification of strabismus category. Telemedicine refers to the use of technology to remotely diagnose and treat medical conditions. This narrative review aimed to assess the efficacy of a variety of telemedicine modalities for the assessment of strabismus. A secondary objective was to quantify overall accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of automated methods using meta-analysis of available data. Methods: A literature search was conducted using the Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library data libraries. Keywords, including "strabismus," "phoria," "telemed*," and "telehealth," were used to locate relevant studies, with Medical Subject Headings terms, free text, and synonyms. No year restrictions were applied. Studies not in English were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Results: Thirty-four studies were included. All outcomes relating to accuracy and reliability of telemedicine versus a reference standard were extracted, as well as qualitative observations. High sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and agreement were consistently shown across studies. Meta-analysis of two subsets featuring automated methods, for which relevant data were available, revealed a pooled accuracy of 0.877 (0.806-0.949), sensitivity of 0.856 (0.805-0.907), and specificity of 0.900 (0.845-0.954). Subcategories "remote standard assessment," "digital image analysis," "wearable devices," "mobile health (mHealth)," and "artificial intelligence" were independently examined. Conclusions: The majority of systems achieved parity with standard physician assessment, with the added benefit of eliminating subjectivity. Meta-analysis results suggest potential introduction of remote automated assessment where conventional assessment is unavailable, although accuracy of current technologies remains limited compared to in-person examination. Telemedicine modalities described offer convenience for patients, shorter examination times, and the potential to go beyond in-person assessments. The evidence gathered in this review supports the beginning of telemedicine integration into the world of strabismus diagnosis.

远程医疗在斜视评估中的作用:叙事回顾与元分析》。
目的:斜视是一种常见的眼部疾病,需要精确量化凝视偏差并确定斜视类别。远程医疗是指利用技术远程诊断和治疗医疗状况。本综述旨在评估各种远程医疗模式对斜视评估的功效。次要目的是通过对现有数据进行荟萃分析,量化自动方法的总体准确性、灵敏度和特异性。研究方法使用 Ovid MEDLINE、Embase 和 Cochrane Library 数据库进行文献检索。关键词包括 "斜视"、"phoria"、"telemed*"和 "telehealth",通过医学主题词、自由文本和同义词查找相关研究。没有年份限制。非英语研究被排除在外。使用 QUADAS-2 工具评估偏倚风险。结果:共纳入 34 项研究。提取了所有与远程医疗与参考标准的准确性和可靠性相关的结果以及定性观察结果。各项研究均显示出较高的灵敏度、特异性、准确性和一致性。对有相关数据的两个以自动方法为特色的子集进行的 Meta 分析表明,汇总的准确性为 0.877(0.806-0.949),灵敏度为 0.856(0.805-0.907),特异性为 0.900(0.845-0.954)。对 "远程标准评估"、"数字图像分析"、"可穿戴设备"、"移动医疗(mHealth)"和 "人工智能 "等子类别进行了独立检查。得出结论:大多数系统都达到了与标准医生评估相当的水平,而且还消除了主观性。Meta 分析结果表明,在无法进行传统评估的情况下,有可能采用远程自动评估,尽管与亲自检查相比,当前技术的准确性仍然有限。所述远程医疗模式为患者提供了便利,缩短了检查时间,并有可能超越亲自评估。本综述收集的证据支持远程医疗开始融入斜视诊断领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Telemedicine and e-Health
Telemedicine and e-Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
6.40%
发文量
270
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Telemedicine and e-Health is the leading peer-reviewed journal for cutting-edge telemedicine applications for achieving optimal patient care and outcomes. It places special emphasis on the impact of telemedicine on the quality, cost effectiveness, and access to healthcare. Telemedicine applications play an increasingly important role in health care. They offer indispensable tools for home healthcare, remote patient monitoring, and disease management, not only for rural health and battlefield care, but also for nursing home, assisted living facilities, and maritime and aviation settings. Telemedicine and e-Health offers timely coverage of the advances in technology that offer practitioners, medical centers, and hospitals new and innovative options for managing patient care, electronic records, and medical billing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信