Understanding ethnic inequities associated with tobacco use in Aotearoa New Zealand: a quantitative analysis.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Niveditha Gurram, Felix Carroll, Christine Ngā Hau Elers, Ririwai Fox, Sara Tepaeru Minster, Erena Wikaire, Lynsey Brown
{"title":"Understanding ethnic inequities associated with tobacco use in Aotearoa New Zealand: a quantitative analysis.","authors":"Niveditha Gurram, Felix Carroll, Christine Ngā Hau Elers, Ririwai Fox, Sara Tepaeru Minster, Erena Wikaire, Lynsey Brown","doi":"10.1093/heapro/daae060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the inclusion of both individual interventions and population-based measures in the Aotearoa New Zealand (Aotearoa NZ) Tobacco Control Programme, the gap between Māori, Pacific peoples and European/Asian/Other (EAO) populations in tobacco use has not decreased significantly. Tobacco control interventions that focus on individual behaviour change have produced little impact towards reducing tobacco smoking inequities for Māori and Pacific peoples in Aotearoa NZ. Using data from the New Zealand Health Survey (NZHS), this research investigates the impact of the wider determinants of health and individual-level factors on inequities in tobacco use between Māori, Pacific peoples and EAO. A conceptual framework was developed to support the theoretical positioning of this research and to inform data categorization, framing, discourse, analyses and interpretation. We conducted hierarchical regression to examine the effect of factors from each domain on ethnic inequities in tobacco use. We found that socioeconomic factors accounted for a significant amount of the disparity in adults currently smoking between Māori and Pacific peoples and EAO. Our results suggest that socioeconomic factors may be a more effective target of intervention than individual behaviours for reducing tobacco-related inequities. Addressing the broader determinants of health through comprehensive cross-agency cooperation to reduce ethnic inequities in tobacco use in Aotearoa NZ is likely to be more effective than individual behaviour change approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":54256,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion International","volume":"39 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daae060","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the inclusion of both individual interventions and population-based measures in the Aotearoa New Zealand (Aotearoa NZ) Tobacco Control Programme, the gap between Māori, Pacific peoples and European/Asian/Other (EAO) populations in tobacco use has not decreased significantly. Tobacco control interventions that focus on individual behaviour change have produced little impact towards reducing tobacco smoking inequities for Māori and Pacific peoples in Aotearoa NZ. Using data from the New Zealand Health Survey (NZHS), this research investigates the impact of the wider determinants of health and individual-level factors on inequities in tobacco use between Māori, Pacific peoples and EAO. A conceptual framework was developed to support the theoretical positioning of this research and to inform data categorization, framing, discourse, analyses and interpretation. We conducted hierarchical regression to examine the effect of factors from each domain on ethnic inequities in tobacco use. We found that socioeconomic factors accounted for a significant amount of the disparity in adults currently smoking between Māori and Pacific peoples and EAO. Our results suggest that socioeconomic factors may be a more effective target of intervention than individual behaviours for reducing tobacco-related inequities. Addressing the broader determinants of health through comprehensive cross-agency cooperation to reduce ethnic inequities in tobacco use in Aotearoa NZ is likely to be more effective than individual behaviour change approaches.

了解新西兰奥特亚罗瓦地区与烟草使用相关的种族不平等现象:定量分析。
尽管在新西兰奥特亚罗瓦烟草控制计划中纳入了个人干预措施和基于人群的措施,但毛利人、太平洋岛屿族裔和欧洲/亚洲/其他族裔在烟草使用方面的差距并未明显缩小。以改变个人行为为重点的烟草控制干预措施对减少新西兰奥特亚罗瓦地区毛利人和太平洋岛屿族裔吸烟不平等的影响甚微。本研究利用新西兰健康调查(NZHS)的数据,调查了更广泛的健康决定因素和个人层面的因素对毛利人、太平洋岛屿族裔和EAO之间烟草使用不平等的影响。我们制定了一个概念框架,以支持本研究的理论定位,并为数据分类、框架、论述、分析和解释提供依据。我们进行了分层回归,以检验每个领域的因素对烟草使用种族不平等的影响。我们发现,社会经济因素在很大程度上造成了毛利人和太平洋岛屿族裔与东非和南部非洲族裔之间成人吸烟率的差异。我们的研究结果表明,在减少与烟草相关的不平等现象方面,社会经济因素可能是比个人行为更有效的干预目标。通过全面的跨机构合作来解决更广泛的健康决定因素,以减少新西兰奥特亚罗瓦地区烟草使用方面的种族不平等现象,可能比改变个人行为的方法更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Promotion International
Health Promotion International Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: Health Promotion International contains refereed original articles, reviews, and debate articles on major themes and innovations in the health promotion field. In line with the remits of the series of global conferences on health promotion the journal expressly invites contributions from sectors beyond health. These may include education, employment, government, the media, industry, environmental agencies, and community networks. As the thought journal of the international health promotion movement we seek in particular theoretical, methodological and activist advances to the field. Thus, the journal provides a unique focal point for articles of high quality that describe not only theories and concepts, research projects and policy formulation, but also planned and spontaneous activities, organizational change, as well as social and environmental development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信