[Effects of nursing visits on primary nursing : An evaluation study in an intensive care unit].

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Dirk Johnen, Lars Krüger, Thomas Mannebach, Francesco Squiccimarro, Gero Langer, Elke Hotze
{"title":"[Effects of nursing visits on primary nursing : An evaluation study in an intensive care unit].","authors":"Dirk Johnen, Lars Krüger, Thomas Mannebach, Francesco Squiccimarro, Gero Langer, Elke Hotze","doi":"10.1007/s00063-024-01163-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>After a pilot phase in 2017, nursing visits (PV) were implemented in an intensive care unit (ICU) at a university hospital. So far, published findings on the impact of PV on the primary nursing organisation system (process-responsible nursing [PP]) could not be identified.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Primary aim was to investigate the effects of PV on PP from the nurses perspective. Secondary aims included comparison with the results of the pilot phase (t<sub>0</sub>) to determine further effects, general conditions of the PP and the overall evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quantitative evaluation study using a standardised questionnaire was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey was conducted in September to October 2023 (t<sub>1</sub>) with a response rate of 74.6% (n = 47). On a scale of 1-6 (strongly agree; strongly disagree), 100.0% of the process-responsible nurses (PP; n = 8) and 77.0% of the nurses without process responsibility (P; n = 30) rated the PV at levels 1-3 (p = 0.328) as contributing to the evaluation of care planning for patients with process responsibility. PV provided support for the implementation of PP (PP: 100.0%, n = 8; P: 79.5%, n = 31; p = 0.318) and had a statistically significant effect (r = 0.97, p = 0.035) on improving the quality of care and care planning for patients with procedural responsibility. The nurses indicated with levels 1-3 that the patients were more consciously brought into the focus of nursing care through the PV (t<sub>1</sub>: 74.4%, n = 35; t0: 86.4%, n = 38; p = 0.953). The PV should take place weekly and was rated with a median of 2 (IQR t<sub>1</sub>: 1-3; t<sub>0</sub>:1-2).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PV support the implementation of PP and patient-centred care in the ICU.</p>","PeriodicalId":49019,"journal":{"name":"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11461771/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-024-01163-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: After a pilot phase in 2017, nursing visits (PV) were implemented in an intensive care unit (ICU) at a university hospital. So far, published findings on the impact of PV on the primary nursing organisation system (process-responsible nursing [PP]) could not be identified.

Aim: Primary aim was to investigate the effects of PV on PP from the nurses perspective. Secondary aims included comparison with the results of the pilot phase (t0) to determine further effects, general conditions of the PP and the overall evaluation.

Methods: A quantitative evaluation study using a standardised questionnaire was used.

Results: The survey was conducted in September to October 2023 (t1) with a response rate of 74.6% (n = 47). On a scale of 1-6 (strongly agree; strongly disagree), 100.0% of the process-responsible nurses (PP; n = 8) and 77.0% of the nurses without process responsibility (P; n = 30) rated the PV at levels 1-3 (p = 0.328) as contributing to the evaluation of care planning for patients with process responsibility. PV provided support for the implementation of PP (PP: 100.0%, n = 8; P: 79.5%, n = 31; p = 0.318) and had a statistically significant effect (r = 0.97, p = 0.035) on improving the quality of care and care planning for patients with procedural responsibility. The nurses indicated with levels 1-3 that the patients were more consciously brought into the focus of nursing care through the PV (t1: 74.4%, n = 35; t0: 86.4%, n = 38; p = 0.953). The PV should take place weekly and was rated with a median of 2 (IQR t1: 1-3; t0:1-2).

Conclusion: PV support the implementation of PP and patient-centred care in the ICU.

[护理访视对基础护理的影响:重症监护病房的评估研究]。
背景:经过2017年的试点阶段后,一家大学医院的重症监护病房(ICU)开始实施护理访视(PV)。迄今为止,尚未发现有关护理访视对主要护理组织系统(流程责任制护理[PP])影响的公开研究结果。目的:主要目的是从护士的角度研究护理访视对PP的影响。次要目标包括与试点阶段(t0)的结果进行比较,以确定进一步的效果、PP 的一般条件和总体评价:方法:采用标准化问卷进行定量评估研究:调查于 2023 年 9 月至 10 月(t1)进行,答复率为 74.6%(n = 47)。以 1-6 级(非常同意;非常不同意)为标准,100.0% 的有流程责任护士(PP;n = 8)和 77.0% 的无流程责任护士(P;n = 30)将 PV 评定为 1-3 级(p = 0.328),认为其有助于对有流程责任患者的护理计划进行评估。PV为PP的实施提供了支持(PP:100.0%,n = 8;P:79.5%,n = 31;p = 0.318),并对改善程序责任患者的护理质量和护理计划有显著影响(r = 0.97,p = 0.035)。1-3级护士表示,通过PV,患者更自觉地成为护理重点(t1:74.4%,n=35;t0:86.4%,n=38;p=0.953)。PV应每周进行一次,评分中位数为2(IQR t1:1-3;t0:1-2):PV支持在重症监护病房实施PP和以患者为中心的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medizinische Klinik – Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin is an internationally respected interdisciplinary journal. It is intended for physicians, nurses, respiratory and physical therapists active in intensive care and accident/emergency units, but also for internists, anesthesiologists, surgeons, neurologists, and pediatricians with special interest in intensive care medicine. Comprehensive reviews describe the most recent advances in the field of internal medicine with special focus on intensive care problems. Freely submitted original articles present important studies in this discipline and promote scientific exchange, while articles in the category Photo essay feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. In the rubric journal club well-respected experts comment on outstanding international publications. Review articles under the rubric "Continuing Medical Education" present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice. The rubrics "Nursing practice" and "Physical therapy" round out the information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信