Mechanical Improvement of Gas Monitoring System in Monoplace Hyperbaric Chamber to Advance the Safety and Efficacy.

IF 1.3 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research Pub Date : 2024-06-20 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/MDER.S465022
Hee Young Lee, Yoonsuk Lee, Hyun Kim, Jin Hui Paik
{"title":"Mechanical Improvement of Gas Monitoring System in Monoplace Hyperbaric Chamber to Advance the Safety and Efficacy.","authors":"Hee Young Lee, Yoonsuk Lee, Hyun Kim, Jin Hui Paik","doi":"10.2147/MDER.S465022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A Monoplace hyperbaric chamber delivers oxygen to the patient's tissues through breathing. Gas monitoring inside the chamber is important because oxygen (O<sub>2</sub>) is consumed, and carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) is increased because treatment is performed in a closed volume. This study aimed to advance the safety and efficacy of the monoplace hyperbaric chamber (MHC) through mechanical improvement in a gas monitoring system (GMS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>First, as the oxygen supply method was changed to the direction of the patient's face, it was compared the values of O<sub>2</sub>, CO<sub>2</sub>, humidity, and temperature were measured in the MHC and the GMS when operating at 2.0 atmosphere absolute (ATA) and 3.0 ATA. Second, to evaluate the effects of variables across measuring time, it was analyzed in a 3-way repeated measure ANOVA (10 min.×20 min.×30 min.). Lastly, the values before and after the optimization of the MHC were compared by applying a cooler to prevent temperature rise inside the MHC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2.0 ATA, the average humidity was higher in the MHC than in the GMS (p<0.001). Also, the average temperature was lower in the MHC than in the GMS (p<0.001). In 3.0 ATA, the average CO<sub>2</sub> and humidity were higher in the MHC than in the GMS, respectively (p<0.001, p=0.004). The 3-way repeated measures ANOVA revealed a significant difference in most main and interacted factors (p<0.05). O<sub>2</sub> and temperature, comparing before and after MHC optimization, revealed a significant difference (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Few studies have verified safety and effectiveness by evaluating the pressure, oxygen concentration, etc. of a monoplace hyperbaric chamber. Further research is expected to verify the effectiveness of providing comfort to patients receiving hyperbaric oxygen treatment and increase the treatment effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":47140,"journal":{"name":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"217-227"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11195672/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S465022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: A Monoplace hyperbaric chamber delivers oxygen to the patient's tissues through breathing. Gas monitoring inside the chamber is important because oxygen (O2) is consumed, and carbon dioxide (CO2) is increased because treatment is performed in a closed volume. This study aimed to advance the safety and efficacy of the monoplace hyperbaric chamber (MHC) through mechanical improvement in a gas monitoring system (GMS).

Methods: First, as the oxygen supply method was changed to the direction of the patient's face, it was compared the values of O2, CO2, humidity, and temperature were measured in the MHC and the GMS when operating at 2.0 atmosphere absolute (ATA) and 3.0 ATA. Second, to evaluate the effects of variables across measuring time, it was analyzed in a 3-way repeated measure ANOVA (10 min.×20 min.×30 min.). Lastly, the values before and after the optimization of the MHC were compared by applying a cooler to prevent temperature rise inside the MHC.

Results: In 2.0 ATA, the average humidity was higher in the MHC than in the GMS (p<0.001). Also, the average temperature was lower in the MHC than in the GMS (p<0.001). In 3.0 ATA, the average CO2 and humidity were higher in the MHC than in the GMS, respectively (p<0.001, p=0.004). The 3-way repeated measures ANOVA revealed a significant difference in most main and interacted factors (p<0.05). O2 and temperature, comparing before and after MHC optimization, revealed a significant difference (p<0.05).

Conclusion: Few studies have verified safety and effectiveness by evaluating the pressure, oxygen concentration, etc. of a monoplace hyperbaric chamber. Further research is expected to verify the effectiveness of providing comfort to patients receiving hyperbaric oxygen treatment and increase the treatment effect.

对单层高压氧舱气体监测系统进行机械改进,以提高其安全性和有效性。
简介Monoplace高压氧舱通过呼吸向患者组织输送氧气。舱内的气体监测非常重要,因为氧气(O2)会被消耗,而二氧化碳(CO2)会增加,因为治疗是在一个封闭的空间内进行的。本研究旨在通过对气体监测系统(GMS)进行机械改进,提高单腔高压氧舱(MHC)的安全性和有效性:方法:首先,由于供氧方式改为面向患者面部,因此比较了高压氧舱和气体监测系统在绝对大气压(ATA)为 2.0 和 3.0 时的氧气、二氧化碳、湿度和温度测量值。其次,为了评估各变量对不同测量时间的影响,采用了 3 向重复测量方差分析(10 分钟×20 分钟×30 分钟)。最后,通过使用冷却器防止 MHC 内部温度升高,比较了 MHC 优化前后的数值:结果:在 2.0 ATA 中,MHC 中的平均湿度高于 GMS 中的平均湿度(p2 和湿度分别高于 GMS 中的平均湿度和温度):很少有研究通过评估单地高压氧舱的压力、氧气浓度等来验证其安全性和有效性。进一步的研究有望验证为接受高压氧治疗的患者提供舒适感和提高治疗效果的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信